User talk:Heijacob

. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:46, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Remember to sign your posts by hitting four ~ at the end, or hitting the Sign button, whenever posting on a Talk page.


 * I would mainly just link to the type of well involved, as long as it's semi-clear what sort of well it is, or maybe a slight rephrase (like I mentioned, "subsea oil well" vice "subsea well" for context). As you note, it's best to avoid re-summarising info covered in the wikilinks themselves, as redundant data is just more stuff that has to be guarded/updated/maintained, and the wikilinks make full details so accessible. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:40, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Thank you for your quick reply. The image is freely available at Statoils web page, please see the link in my article. I contacted Statoil with a formal request and asked if it was possible for me to use the picture on Wikipedia, and the reply (mail) from Statoil was that it was ok as long as I credited the image to Statoil. Do you think I can get the picture approved if I go through the OTRS? Heijacob (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the late reply. I was expecting the response on my page (hence the notice)
 * The website is clearly marked as copyright Statoil, so the image is not free. You can find a lot of information here as to how you should request copyright permission. MrKIA11 (talk) 19:21, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

On de-orphaning Riserless Light Well Intervention
Greetings, the page will probably be auto-tagged as "orphan" by a 'bot since presumably few pages link to it. In order to better-link your page into others, I suggest you find some related pages and add RLWI as a "See also" at the end, and/or find a few of the specific pages about sea-drilling and add maybe just a sentence or so in the appopriate section about drilling options and briefly explain RLWI and link to your article. The better linked-in to other petroleum/drilling articles you are, the more views the page will get. MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:27, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply MatthewVanitas. Do you still believe it is too technical, or has it improved since your last review? I will try to link it into other pages. Heijacob (talk) 15:41, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't remove the technical data, but it really needs to have a dumbed-down intro that puts it into context. As a non-oiler, I have to do a lot of squinting to even guess what it is about. Can you briefly try, here on this page, to give me a one-sentence 8th-grade level explanation of what RLWI is, and then I can try to summarise that for the intro? Again, you don't need to change the whole article, just find a really accessible way to lead off. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I will try to think of something, this is a good excersise for me as well as I take this for granted. I appreciate your support. Heijacob (talk) 16:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)