User talk:Heisenberg5658/Nancy Skolos

In order to improve the article that I have chosen about the American Graphic Designer Nancy Skolos I will have to add more facts than the ones that already exist on the article. If you look at the article it is very basic and only has very little facts about her actual life. It more just states her accomplishments with her husband. I plan to take a deep delve into google and see if I can find any relevant information about her life that's not only her accomplishments. For instance, I want information about her childhood and what drove her to be a graphic designer. I mostly just have to find examples of writing that are not biased towards her. These most likely are in scholarly articles that have been written about her by a unbiased source. While most of the time these are hard to find I believe with enough search I will be able to find them. I also need to find a photo of her that is Public Domain but for now I cannot find any that satisfy the Wikipedia terms and conditions. As previously stated I believe that the article that is posted about her now is just very vague and is in need of more satisfactory information. I will do my very best to put the most relevant information that is interesting and actually shows people the kind of person she is outside of just random facts. Looking back I realize that the most important thing for Wikipedia is making sure that everything is cited and not using people words exactly as it is written except when it I cite it. For the most part this is the most important thing for me because I do not want to be known as someone who cheats and takes the easy way out by taking other peoples words and making it my own. That is called plagrism and in some cases can be binded by law. In order to make everything fit with the guidelines of Wikipedia I will either cite information. I promise that by the time I am done with article that I would have given it justice and it will be completed to the best of my abilities and hopefully others will like it as well. Heisenberg5658 (talk) 06:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Heisenberg5658
 * This is a start for a workplan, though you don't speak very concretely about what you are planning to do. The exception is the discussion of images; I appreciate that you understand the complexity of copyright and how it controls what you can/cannot do. Please be more succinct, and concrete. Please do the same with the annotated link list! Please see this fellow student's work for a good example. --Theredproject (talk) 03:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing any progress since my last comment. Where is your annotated bibliography, and 1000 words added to the article? Feel free to email me if you have questions.


 * Next step is to peer review one of your classmate’s articles. Like your own, these will be on their sandbox pages. You should be able to see who is assigned each article on the Assigned Articles tab, so click on their username to find their sandbox. Remember, you had a training on this, which you can rely on. Feel free to email me if you have questions. --Theredproject (talk) 23:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)