User talk:Hektor/Archive 13

Orphaned non-free image File:Monica car logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Monica car logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Michelin nyc 2006.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Michelin nyc 2006.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Christian Giersing (talk) 06:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo 2011 su candidature shenzhen.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Logo 2011 su candidature shenzhen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  06:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Davros
A small change, but I changed the category from "Fictional scientists" to "Fictional mad scientists". Let's face it, Davros is about as sane as a sack of rabid ferrets... Half Shadow  09:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, I just wanted an excuse to use the term "Sane as a sack of rabid ferrets", but there you go. Half Shadow  21:43, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

ITN
--Kslotte (talk) 12:19, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

--Kslotte (talk) 12:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dorothy Doughty


A tag has been placed on Dorothy Doughty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Burhan Ahmed (talk • contribs) 17:09, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Jacques Bourboulon
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jacques Bourboulon, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.artandpopularculture.com/Jacques_Bourboulon.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:22, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Jacques Bourboulon
Hello, I am the admin that deleted Jacques Bourboulon and the message that you left on the talk page is correct, I should have contacted the creator, mea culpa. I read the statement that he photographed nude teenagers (paraphrased) could not find a reference to confirm it and immediately thought G10. In hind site, a rewording of the article, similar to yours, and a notification to contributing editors would have been much more appropriate. You have my apologies and I hope the next time our paths cross it is under more pleasant circumstances. J04n(talk page) 12:28, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jacques Bourboulon


The article Jacques Bourboulon has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  20:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ATV-JohannesKepler.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:ATV-JohannesKepler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hugahoody (talk) 17:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Current spaceflight template
Would you care to explain your reverts, and ideally participate in the discussion at Template talk:Current spaceflight if you disagree with the template's guidelines? --Conti|✉ 09:14, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The template should not remain in place on spacecraft or spaceflights which are undergoing routine operations. They should only be used around the times of major mission events (eg. immediately after launch, during docking/undocking, during EVAs, end of mission, orbit changes, etc), or if something unexpected or anomalous happens (eg. the spacecraft develops a problem or fails completely). -- G W … 13:27, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Bristol Cars
As a previous contributor, you might want to have a look at Bristol Cars. Another user, with a long history of contentious edits, has deleted nearly the entire page and replaced it with broken up sections. See Talk:Bristol_Cars for what is going on. Best,  ⊂&#124; Mr.choppers &#124;⊃   (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Torchwood Miracle Day Title.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Torchwood Miracle Day Title.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► without portfolio ─╢ 10:32, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Torchwood Miracle Day Title.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Torchwood Miracle Day Title.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

About Tristane Banon
Buona sera, Ettore! Sono Shirt58 in Australia. Ciao, come stai?

Apologies for the salutation in Italian; my French is non-existant. I've taken the liberty to add to Talk:Tristane Banon. And about L'Affaire Strauss-Kahn... well, I'm seeing big, big red flags there, with no relation at all to their socialism.

Your thoughts about this? --Shirt58 (talk) 11:11, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * She went to French television (cable TV) to tell the story in 2008. Then it's the word of one individual, I agree. Hektor (talk) 11:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Citroen metropolis.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Citroen metropolis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:53, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Danièle Sallenave


The article Danièle Sallenave has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 14:34, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Naviplane n500
bjr , Pensez vous qu'il soit possible de placer le lien facebook ci apres http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.228564727154310.67298.228564230487693

Dans external links de la page naviplane_n500 anglaise ?

C'est un ancien de la sedam qui place photo et commentaires inedits au sujet du n500 sur face de bouc.

Merci de votre avis! Bien à vous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.181.54.14 (talk) 15:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Je ne suis pas assez savant sur les regles wikipedia pour vous repondre. Hektor (talk) 13:28, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pyeongchang2018.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:Pyeongchang2018.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Sochi 2014
Enough with this, if you do not have a valid reference citing that IOC contacted WF, and that "s", "o", "c", "h", "I", "2", "0", "1", "4" (the most original piece in this work), and the PD-old Olympic rings, are an original work, you will be reported to respective noticeboards. You are owning an image that is less original than this work. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  06:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Again WF pseudo-lawyer give solid evidence the work passes the de minimis threshold of originality, asserting its copyrightability, or that the designed agent is responable of that decition. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!  See terms and conditions.  07:40, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Atlantis
Once again : this amounts to fan cruft. Of course this has probably been discussed internally at NASA, but NASA has never and will never communicate on such a mission, which will never happen.

Maybe we can stop abusing NASASpaceflight.com now? Colds7ream (talk) 16:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * This site is not a reliable source. I stand by my comment. Hektor (talk) 19:18, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Tristane Banon
Hi Hektor,

I saw your recent edit in Tristane Banon and was happy to allow it to stand, but a more experienced editor than me, who I am happy to defer to, deleted it. I do think on reflection the reference to Anne Mansouret should definitely have gone on BLP grounds. I shouldn't have allowed that. As for the meeting between lawyers, that's really 'newsy'. If something definite comes of it then perhaps that's the time to include. Since the article began as a translation of the French article, perhaps a good working test for including content (at least it would provide a justification), would be that it appears there. At any rate there's a section on the Talk page if you want to argue your case. Thank you. FightingMac (talk) 08:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mandala Tayde


The article Mandala Tayde has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Thompson.matthew (talk) 15:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of William Meynard


A tag has been placed on William Meynard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ~ Red Rover  (Talk to me!) contribs  11:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at William Meynard
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from William Meynard, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with William Meynard. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's . Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 11:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at William Meynard, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 11:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Reported to AIV
Hi Hektor, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported the issue of you removing speedy deletion templates to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 11:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nanjing Youth Olympics 2014.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Nanjing Youth Olympics 2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:39, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Prometheus spacecraft logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Prometheus spacecraft logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Sochi 2014 - Logo.svg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sochi 2014 - Logo.svg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  06:22, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Francoise_maitresse.jpg
I have tagged File:Francoise_maitresse.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 13:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Liberty launch vehicle.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Liberty launch vehicle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

TT-talkback
╟─ Treasury Tag ► UK EYES ONLY ─╢ 08:08, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Estelle Desanges - French Kiss.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Estelle Desanges - French Kiss.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:37, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:French Kiss 2.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:French Kiss 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi
I can't see this video, I think it's because my IP is outside the mainland, is it anything like this video ? Penyulap  talk 14:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Hektor (talk) 15:34, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I've responded on the talkpage. Penyulap   talk 16:11, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

ITN
Thank you, Grey Hood   Talk  08:43, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Vache à boire.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vache à boire.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:39, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aleksey Ovchinin


The article Aleksey Ovchinin has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A cosmonaut who hasn't yet gone into space (according to his record at Spacefacts). Fails notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Claret Ash  12:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for deprodding this. I hadn't yet come across that policy. We live and we learn.  Claret Ash  12:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Anyway he should fly soon. Hektor (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)