User talk:Helaedit

June 2022
Hello, I'm Dan arndt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Govigama have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Do not continue to add unsourced opinions - if you believe that the information is accurate then you need to cite references to establish the material is accurate and not your personal opinion. Dan arndt (talk) 23:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Govigama shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dan arndt (talk) 23:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Govigama. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 22:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Govigama, you may be blocked from editing. Dan arndt (talk) 23:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Govigama
Do not continue to add unsourced material to the article on Govigama. If you believe the information to be correct and accurate you need to provide independent reliable references that support that information otherwise it is just your personal opinion and will continue to be deleted. Dan arndt (talk) 00:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm Dan arndt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Govigama have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Your edits will continue to be reverted if you add them without any supporting references citing reliable secondary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 01:20, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, I'm Dan arndt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Govigama have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Dan arndt (talk) 21:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)