User talk:Helenmonicacarter

Mathern Palace
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Re. your edits to Mathern Palace, we don't removed sourced material without good reason. Obviously, if it is incorrect, then it could go, but the line re. the recent advertisement for sale isn't. The Argus article is accurate, and the house appeared for sale on Rightmove etc. KJP1 (talk) 07:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * As before, please don’t remove sourced material. KJP1 (talk) 20:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I thought it might help if I tried to explain a little more about how Wikipedia works.
 * Reliable sources - Our starting point is the use of Reliable Sources (RS). This means we don’t write what we know/believe but we reflect what the sources say. So, in the case of Mathern Palace, I write that it was put up for sale in 2019 because that is what the South Wales Argus, a reliable source, says.
 * Verifiability - we use citations to reliable sources to enable readers to verify (check) what we write. So, when I write the palace was up for sale in 2019, readers can click on the cite and check that for themselves. If you remove the cites, as you did, readers can’t check what’s been written.
 * Conflict of interest - If editors have a connection to the subject they are writing about, they are strongly advised not to edit the article themselves, but to comment on the article Talkpage and ask others to action their comments. They are also required to declare their interest. As an aside, your chosen username, and your editing only a single topic makes you pretty readily identifiable online. You may want to think about changing your username.

I hope this helps. I’d be very happy to advise if there’s anything in the Mathern Palace article you’d like changed/think is incorrect. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 07:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)