User talk:HelenoBR

AfD nomination of Antoni Lesniowski
Antoni Lesniowski, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Antoni Lesniowski satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Antoni Lesniowski and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Antoni Lesniowski during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Hammer1980 ·talk 17:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Behind the curve


A tag has been placed on Behind the curve, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Breawycker (talk to me!) 21:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC) And then the article is now online, as written by someone else. It seems that someone wanted to claim ownership over this specific article creation. So be it. The important thing is that the article is now online. HelenoBR (talk) 03:48, 5 February 2020 (UTC)