User talk:Helianthi

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Helianthi! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Vanessa Wagner -

Commenting on moves
Hello!

I saw you've commented on the move of the Armenian Genocide denial article. Can you please tell me where you founf the link to it? Or maybe it was just a random reading where you entered to the talk-page and commented? Aregakn (talk) 20:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Please give me a talk-back on my page, when answered. Aregakn (talk) 20:44, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Quantum electrodynamics
Hi,

I think I have addressed your points about prose so your answer there is not clear for me. I have rewritten properly the sentences you questioned. Please, let me know if better rephrasing is needed with respect to what I have already done to answer your comments. Further consider that English is not my mother language and so it is well possible that GA status for this article could be only achieved with some other editor better suited for this aim. Thanks beforehand.--Pra1998 (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for your very helpful review of this article. It is a true significant goal reached.--Pra1998 (talk) 19:31, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Pärt
The Cantos is far from GA status, so I've helpfully rvt'd your nom. Non need to thank me [gosh!]. If your are aiming towards that, gimme a bell after some sweat and reading and adding. Ceoil (talk) 00:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Failing Buck Danny GA review
I left some comments at Talk:Buck Danny/GA1 why the article is not suitable for GA. If you have any questions, feel free to leave them there, however, this article needs considerable work. I would suggest reading several articles at Portal:Featured content and seeing how they are structured, and see if you can emulate that structure for this article, Sadads (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Circ3.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Service planning (train)


The article Service planning (train) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced, not independently notable, title appears to be a neologism. (Graph described is type of time distance diagram)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Train2104 (t • c) 13:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Pony Express
Pony Express has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Epicgenius (talk) 15:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of LAN-free backup


The article LAN-free backup has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)