User talk:Heliosxeros/Archive 2

13:18:00, 8 March 2018 review of submission by Lgattass
I would like clarification as to which references did not meet wikipedias's standards. Please let me know and I'll address the specific concerns Thank you LGattass Lgattass (talk) 13:18, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

What you make sick dear
What you make sick dear — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupamkapil (talk • contribs) 13:55, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Please suggest the correct method
Hi Heliosxeros,

Thanks for Review this page. I know there was some issue in sources. But i have dome some changes. Please review again and suggest me..

Regards, Anupam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupamkapil (talk • contribs) 14:06, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello Heliosxeros

I am trying to write and article about Thomas O'Hara (Fine Artist), Thomas O'Hara as given me to write this article about him due is recent recognition of his visual artist practice. you stated that I have over used "The Telegraph & Argus" however this what is currently available to the public at this time about is personal life, how do we go about it ? {Talkback|Heliosxeros} prefix:User talk:Heliosxeros/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by To250076 (talk • contribs) 18:24, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Query follow-up
Dear Heliosxeros,

Greetings, thank you for your feedback. You noted that my submission was composed like an essay as opposed to an encyclopedic article. I'd like to be able to adjust accordingly.

If you are willing, would you be able to either provide a good example via a Wikipedia article or perhaps additional clarifications specific to my submission.

My sincere thanks in advance for considering this request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertPFrenchII (talk • contribs) 05:49, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

05:27:18, 10 March 2018 review of submission by Pajokie
Please provide further explanation for not accepting Addison Caldwell page and what changes need to be made. Thanks Pajokie (talk) 05:27, 10 March 2018 (UTC)pajokie

Reason for non acceptance was Per WP:NOTMEMORIAL. 4. Memorials. Subjects of encyclopedia articles must satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements.

The text is the inscription on a historic sign and statue for a person that meets the notability standards. It is relevant and worthy of inclusion. Thanks Pajokie (talk) 06:07, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Pajokie

Outhentic draft
Dear Heliosxeros, Thank you for your message but it's the same like the messages from another two users that had been reviewed my article. I can't really understand what more do you want me to do, I deleted almost the whole information and sources in the article and you still don't like what I did. I obviously can't understand what reliable sources mean. When I add some source you delete it imediately or just don't like it. Please explain to me what exactly do you want me to do and don't left to me the same message. Cheers, Rayna --Rayna Vasileva (talk) 07:52, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

22:32:23, 10 March 2018 review of submission by Scoutttttttt
Scoutttttttt (talk) 22:33, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

01:33:35, 12 March 2018 review of submission by Monica roberts
I'm not understanding the problem with the article i submitted. All seem to be in order as far as information and content and i cited my references using visual editor. I'm not sure what your'e asking of me in terms of "footnotes". Are you asking me to re-enter my citations manually in source editing? Monica roberts (talk) 01:33, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Not understanding what your'e asking??...
I'm not understanding the problem with the article i submitted. All seem to be in order as far as information and content and i cited my references using visual editor. I'm not sure what your'e asking of me in terms of "footnotes". Are you asking me to re-enter my citations manually in source editing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monica roberts (talk • contribs) 01:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Request on 04:19:21, 12 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Johnrusselagonoy
Johnrusselagonoy (talk) 04:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Message?

Wan Abdul Muiz Wan Abdul Aziz
Dear, Heliosxeros. This is regarding,the page that i put up on Wan Abdul Muiz Wan Abdul Aziz. how can i improve the page as He is a national sports person in tennis as he has represented the Malaysia's National Team and also played in ATP 250 Kuala Lumpur.

Thanks and Regards. Rachel Feyenoord (talk) 17:13, 12 March 2018 (UTC) Rachel Feyenoord

12:33:52, 13 March 2018 review of submission by InforgMM
I have added inline citations and footnotes to this article, please re-review it! InforgMM (talk) 12:33, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

12:38:18, 13 March 2018 review of submission by InforgMM
Dear Heliosxeros, please re-review the article "Monika Mécs" because I have added inline citations and footnotes to it!!

Thank you!

InforgMM (talk) 12:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

15:28:16, 13 March 2018 review of submission by Molslater
Molslater (talk) 15:28, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Heliosxeros, Thank you for coming back to my iMindMap submission. I am practising writing an article by writing about a software tool I use. I have based what I've written on scholar articles and books I have found. Were there any lines in particular that read more like an advert than an encyclopedia. I am a learner so any help you can give will be greatly appreciated. Many thanks! Molslater (talk) 15:28, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Are you reviewing or just declining drafts submissions?
Sorry but i think you did not check my that page Draft:Dumpukht- Aatish-e-ishq i added inline citations and added many corrections, what can i do further? Sorry but please check once more its my request because i am also editor like you and you just declining drafts please check once again KarthikSKS (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Sorry i think its my fault because another user also declined that page KarthikSKS (talk) 13:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Request on 17:11:00, 13 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by PJCCI
Hello,

The Communications director left and we are missing some information about wikipedia maintenance. I am the Communication coordinator for the company and I am trying to complete some information (we had pages in french and I am trying to add the equivalent to english) I personnally don't own the rights of the content but The company for which I am doing it obviously does.

We would also add information about other infrastructures that we manage and I want to make sure I can add the content without any problems. I can make sure not to add content on shich the company doesn't own the rights but I must be able to add content for the company.

PJCCI (talk) 17:11, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

19:30:06, 13 March 2018 review of submission by ElaMalkovsky
Thank you so much for taking the time to review my contribution on Sol Algranti. I am eager to revise it to meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. If you could help me identify the specific sections that are missing footnotes, that would be immensely helpful. Many thanks again, (ElaMalkovsky (talk) 19:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)) ElaMalkovsky (talk) 19:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

10:38:22, 14 March 2018 review of submission by Ktbos
One of the reasons I'm creating the page is that numerous pages had already cited this particular band and I've added more that do now. All told, I think there are 4 or 5 different Wikipedia pages that have a red link for this band. Creating this page will provide a connection for all of those pages. That, to me, is significant in and of itself.

I will do some more digging now for other info and update the draft with whatever I find. Thanks.

Ktbos (talk) 10:38, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Article Submission
Dear Heliosxeros,

Thank you for reviewing my article "InterNations". I was wondering if you could give me further or more specifric guidance before I re-submit another draft for review?

Best, BooRadleysPsych (talk) 11:56, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

12:11:52, 14 March 2018 review of submission by Densha727
I don't feel that this article is about a single news event. For reference, there is an extensive entry in Japanese-language wikipedia on Michiko Kanba:

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%A8%BA%E7%BE%8E%E6%99%BA%E5%AD%90

Densha727 (talk) 12:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Declined draft
In declining Draft:Ancient Mortgages in New York, you left the comment "This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information." I would say that this is a less than helpful comment. WP:NOT is a rather large guideline, and documents a lot of different things that Wikipedia is not. Your comment leaves the author with little guidance on how to improve their article to meet standards. Indeed, as a seasoned Wikipedia editor, I have no idea on what grounds you found the article objectionable. I think a little more clarity will help draft authors greatly. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:24, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Leaving useful comments when declining drafts
Hi Heliosxeros. Thanks for all your reviewing work. You will have seen I have replied to someone over at WP:AFCHD who was left unclear about the reason why you declined their draft. You were probably right to decline it, but I do think your comment was particularly unhelpful. Here you can quickly see the drafts you've reviewed. It would be great if you could increase the proportion of reviews where you leave some guidance to the editor that makes it clear how they should improve the draft. Also, looking back at the questions from authors of declined drafts on your talk page, are you having difficulty keeping up with responding to them? There are some 36 comments awaiting your reply from the last 12 days. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:15, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * From now onwards, I will leave guidance and advice together with the reviews. For the 36 comments on my talkpage, I did replied them not on my own talkpage but on the author's talkpage. Anyway, thanks for highlighting the error of my ways. EROS message 07:33, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Please review my page again
Hi Heliosxeros,

I request you, can you please check my page again. I have update the sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Desimartini

- Anupam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupamkapil (talk • contribs) 05:06, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

06:47:36, 15 March 2018 review of submission by Cynthiaajunwa
Hi. I'm just wondering why this was flagged because of copyright issues. Any points that were not completely rephrased was done so because the point were facts. There are only so many ways that you can rephrase facts of an event that happened. Every time that I rephrased something I cited it and gave credit to the source that I received the information from. I'm just wondering what I can do to be able to have my page submitted. I sincerely cannot think of any other way to re-word historical dates, events, and circumstanced while adding no analysis and remaining neutral as you should on Wikipedia. I assumed that rephrasing was allowed as long as I credited where it came from, and I did that all throughout the page. I would love some feedback, or for you to reconsider the submission decline. Thank You! Cynthiaajunwa (talk) 06:47, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

09:26:09, 15 March 2018 review of submission by Vivek Ray
Hi, can you help me to find how my draft violated the copyright rules? There are around 5 to 6 sentences only and I cannot determine how it violated it as I have written it in my own words. Thanks you. Vivek Ray (talk) 09:26, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your rejection messageon my talkpage: its a flase flag
Your rejection of my article [perhaps based on the false results by your review tool]: You rejected one of my draft article. Whichever tool you are using, is providing false results. Please read your message and my reply on my talkpage. I have also copy pasted my reply on the article talk page. Re-review. 202.156.182.84 (talk) 17:50, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Go slow during your learning curve and avoid trigger-happy urges: By looking at your talk page, seems you have managed to generate several complaint against yourself in a very short time by using your review-rejection tool. I assume in goodfaith that you are new and still learning the rope. you have my understanding, encouragement and compassion during your learning curve. Please be extremely careful before rejecting. Perhaps spend more time learning about how wikipedia works before putting yourself in the reviewer's role. Read, understand, spend time on the article, etc before rejecting anyone's work. Keep up the learning. But, go slow, go easy on others and yourself. Take extreme care to ensure no one is antagonised. Good luck. 202.156.182.84 (talk) 17:35, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Article Submission
Dear Heliosxeros,

Thank you for your advice. I will make the changes as soon as possible. I had sent another draft in for submission before you had told me the necessary changes to make so I will need to edit that draft again.

Thanks again, BooRadleysPsych (talk) 08:04, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Od-klein (talk) 12:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC) Review of Submission
Greetings Heliosxeros, Thank you very much for your feedback. However, I'm left confused as I've added much needed citation. Could you please review and point out the issue? Much appreciated.

09:57:30, 18 March 2018 review of submission by Johnoberg
Hi there. I've made the recommended changes (making it from a more neutral point of view) and fixed the development team description. Could you please review it again and release for publication? Johnoberg (talk) 09:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Carlosmoreira69
Hi Heliosxeros and thanks for your work assessing drafts. I noticed a problem though: You declined the above draft as a copyright violation. However, there's no copyvio on the page that I can detect, just a quotation from The Daily Beast. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:43, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Similarly, Draft:Hotel de Paris (Georgetown, Colorado) contained no copyvio at the time you tagged it. here is the copyvio report. While the overlap is at 21.3%, all I see is place names and things like that. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:12, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Here's another: Draft:John Bush (Filmmaker). The only copying is quotations from reviews. I'll let you know if I find any others. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for highlighting my errors, I now do realise that the overlap percentage doesn't necessarily means copyvio. There were a few submissions in the past where I did this confusion. EROS message 02:20, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

04:41:50, 19 March 2018 review of submission by Julia mji
Hello, I would like to ask why my article for Popovy Sisters was not approved and what should be changed/fixed ? Julia mji (talk) 04:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

05:58:51, 19 March 2018 review of submission by Julia mji
Hello, I fixed few things in the article, would you mind looking into it one more time. Julia mji (talk) 05:58, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Help with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Michael_Stall
Hi - not sure why you declined my article. I did cite references to this author - unfortunately, the author writes under a pseudonym so it's hard to find quality sources - though I have cited previous publications he is published in (e.g. sci-fi journal). Just Because ! (talk) 09:49, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Request on 09:59:08, 19 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Computer Risk Management
Thanks for reviewing my page, I was wondering which part of my page wasn't properly copyrighted? Also - would you be able to send me the text from my page via email? I spent a lot of time creating the page, and so don't want the text to be lost.

Thank you,

(Computer Risk Management (talk) 09:59, 19 March 2018 (UTC))

Computer Risk Management (talk) 09:59, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

AfC Women in Focus Society
Hi Heliosxeros, thank you for your review of my article. I've added many new sources to the article, but please keep in mind that what is a credible, reliable source in the field of Canadian art history may be unfamiliar to you. --13ab37 (talk) 15:45, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

de.NBI
Dear Heliosxeros,

thank you for the review of my draft article about de.NBI. You think that the article sounds like a catalog. Can you give me an example why it sounds like that? Other improvement ideas are welcome, because I know the article is not perfect and it is difficult to describe a quite new initiative in Germany and Europe, because references are missing.

Thanks in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomAtdeNBIoffice (talk • contribs) 15:46, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

22:03:48, 19 March 2018 review of submission by C maza
There is an article of a similar organization called Vertafore saying almost the exact same thing "Vertafore employs over 1,300 people in 11 offices across the country, and was the fifth largest cloud computing company in the Seattle area in 2014, behind Microsoft, HP, Google, and Amazon, with $400 million in revenue." yet they are allowed to have their article published. I'm just wondering what the difference seems to be and why my article is being considered as advertisement while their's is not? C maza (talk) 22:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

01:34:58, 20 March 2018 review of submission by ElaMalkovsky
Eros, thank you so much for your quick feedback. I dug deeper and was able to revise the submission on Sol Algranti with additional citations in all sections, including "Personal life." Please let me know if there is anything I can do to further improve this article in order to meet Wikipedia standards, or if I can help in any way with other Wikipedia submissions (particularly on business related biographies). Warm regards, ElaMalkovsky (talk) 01:34, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

11:23:15, 20 March 2018 review of submission by InforgMM
We have re-edited the citations, Please check again!

thank you!

InforgMM (talk) 11:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Can you please review my page again
Hi Heliosxeros, Thank you so much for review my page on 15 Mar 2018 and suggest me for the correct sources. I am new here, so I want to learn more. I have search new reliable sources for my page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Desimartini I hope that this time i have use the correct sources. Kindly review and check.

Waiting for your kind response.

Thanks, Anupam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupamkapil (talk • contribs) 13:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft Rejection
You've rejected the draft of Grami's Circus Show (can't wikilink it until I learn how to do it properly with drafts) saying the references don't show notability, but I think that being a Netflix show and winning at least two awards is enough to be notable. Can you suggest something that I can add to show the notability? TryKid (talk) 18:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Membran draft article
Hi, Thanks for taking the time to review my submission for Membran Entertainment Group. I am curious why certain companies that are less significant that Membran Entertainment are accepted. For example, 604 Records has an article containing much less information and only two references (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/604_Records). Rob — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcalvin5 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Request on 19:22:21, 22 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Dfrancesconi
Smart Hydro is my first article that I am writing on Wikipedia. I'm not quite familiar with all the intricacies behind Wikipedia article writing. Smart Hydro is an initiative (IEC and IEEE) to standardize artificial intelligence within the hydro power generation industry. I removed the notions that were apparently advertising. The latest comment was that it read like a textbook, which is partly the goal. I can't seem to find the recipe to convert into an acceptable Wikipedia article. The smart hydro related information is quite nonexistent since it is a new field of work. Thanks in advance for your input.

Dfrancesconi (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Endre Bårvåg Nesse and User talk:Rygjafylki
Please be careful - the page you declined AFC was CLEARLY and WITHOUT A DOUBT an attack page, and should have immediately been speedy deletion tagged. Assuming the photo of the subject was correct, I assume it was created to bully the subject person. While there were illusions of an actual article, the language and words used clearly was meant to attack the subject person.--Cahk (talk) 22:20, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lay's Endorsement


Hello, Heliosxeros. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lay's Endorsement".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  11:36, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

13:50:20, 26 March 2018 review of submission by KSRadhakrishnan
KSRadhakrishnan (talk) 13:50, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

02:54:33, 27 March 2018 review of submission by Spenserblank
Hello, I am wondering if you could provide more details as to how to include copyright text on to Wikipedia? As I stated in the draft, I am being paid on behalf of the client to help publish this new topic on Wikipedia. They would like to have the same information that is on their website, https://openroadscommunity.com/. If there is a way to include copyright information, please let me know. Or, please let me know what we need to do in order to get this published correctly. Thanks!

Spenserblank (talk) 02:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

14:26:25, 27 March 2018 review of submission by GentianB
Hi Heliosxeros! Thank you for taking time to review my article. Would it be possible to tell me how I can improve my draft so it fits the Wikipedia criteria? I apologize if I ask a stupid question, but I am new to this and it seems a bit complicated to me. Thank you for taking time. Kind regards

GentianB (talk) 14:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:A. A. Cook, Architect
Hello Heliosxeros. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:A. A. Cook, Architect, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A-criteria cannot be applied to articles outside Mainspace. Thank you. SoWhy 14:28, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Rejection of page based on copyright violation - Printerland article
Thanks for reviewing my page, I was wondering which part of my page wasn't properly copyrighted? Every piece of information on my page has been sourced, so I'm not sure why its been rejected. Please reply as soon as possible, this is now an urgent matter.

(Computer Risk Management (talk) 15:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC))

About rejected submission: Sergey Balenok
Hello Heliosxeros,

Thank you for reviewing my draft submission. Your review clearly stated that this article has been rejected for the reason that the references that have been included did not adequately show the subject's notability. I still believe that the subject is indeed notable, and would like to try and correct this aspect in the subsequent submission or submissions. Please review my reasons below, as well as intended corrections.

The primary requirement for establishing notability is stated as providing references to the information about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. I believe that I have provided at least one such secondary source, the reference the article about the subject in his country's recently published encyclopedia. Perhaps my mistake was to include the reference to this publication only in its native language, Belorussian, which is not widely known or used outside that country. For the updated submission, I will include the translation of the reference into English.

Another type of information that perhaps helps establish the subject's notability is the long list of exhibitions of subject's artwork, showing a level of international recognition. This includes both solo exhibitions in the top venues in his own country, Belarus, and both solo and group shows in multiple countries, including Russia, China, Poland, Lithuania, Sweden, Hungary, and Switzerland. The list of external references includes primary sources to the publications that reference contemporary, local publication that establish the subject's participation in these shows. For the updated submission, I will try to highlight those references better.

It is my firm belief that Sergey Balenok is a notable artist who merits a reference in Wikipedia. I intend to continue working on the article to try and meet Wikipedia's high standards.

Any and all advice you choose to provide will be greatly appreciated.

Best regards,

ES — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErnestoSaffo (talk • contribs) 15:42, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion and drafts
Please stop inappropriately tagging drafts with main-space criteria. Notability and test criteria specifically do not apply to draft space. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Request on 18:21:11, 27 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Poptop43
I am a 74 year old 99% retired physician (pathologist). The Broward County school massacre happened. I had a tip that the PROMISE Program (I'd never heard of it) might have unitendedly kept some of the shooter prior activities out of the governmental background check system. I found it hard to find specific info & checked Wikipedia. For the first time, I desired to start a wikipedia page when I found nothing in Wikipedia about the program. Due to a family emergency where-in the DSS Child Protective Services has placed 2 of our teenaged grandchildren with us 2 weeks ago, I just do not have the focus to do a complete page & had haoped that starting the page could trigger a few other Wikipedia editors to contibute here and there and that the page would flesh out. As much as I hate to, I must admit that I just do not (under these stressful circumstances) have enough steam in my engine to draft a complete page.

Poptop43 (talk) 18:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

13:37:50, 28 March 2018 review of submission by Carlosmoreira69
Carlos Moreira 13:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

INQUIRY ON PEARL OF AFRICA (PAE) SUBMISSION.
Hello, I hope you are well. I would like to kindly request you to tell me into depth the reason for your decline on the article I wrote about the NGO in Uganda, Africa, pearlofafricaenvironment.org I would humbly like to know so in order to sufficiently improve my article. I have recently improved it after your feedback so I hereby request you to look at it and inform me of any changes that you believe ought to be made.

Thank you and any help rendered to me will highly be appreciated. I will be awaiting your response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Linah Nanziri (talk • contribs) 14:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Lethal White (novel) Submission Inquiry
I have replied to your notification on my Talk page. Can you read it and respond? -- IbexNu (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Request on 13:52:24, 29 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Linah Nanziri
Greetings and thank you for the prompt and helpful response. I have read those recommended pages before but I nevertheless highly appreciate your effort in sharing them with me so as to remind me of some aspects that I had not paid close attention to. I have completely adjusted the puffery language and neutralized all statements made in the article, as you said. I also altered the language used in the Summary of Campaigns section in order to neutralise it. You recommended that it ought to be deleted, however, it is the core basis of the NGOs activities, which are also evinced in the reference list, hence its relevance to the article.

I hereby request you to read the adjustments and feasibly publish my article, thank you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Linah_Nanziri Linah Nanziri (talk) 13:52, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

12:34:59, 30 March 2018 review of submission by W.J. Gies
Hello, and thank you for your review. We understand the need for outside articles and will address that immediately. May I ask how our submission is more like an advertisement than the International College of Dentists? Their first sentence is factually inaccurate (they have had to change their website to remove the claim that they are the oldest honorary dental society), and they also only speak of the positive things the organization has done, as have we. Could you please provide a specific example of what makes ours an advertisement, or is it more that we need other sources?

We are new to this and we appreciate your help.

W.J. Gies (talk) 12:34, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

01:46:21, 31 March 2018 review of submission by Ddennis.cpa
I am new at this and am trying to understand why this reads as an advertisement. This is a regulatory body. Can you please advise how I should change this. Thank you.

Ddennis.cpa (talk) 01:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

10:05:17, 1 April 2018 review of submission by Carlosmoreira69
Carlos Moreira 10:05, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

21:15:54, 1 April 2018 review of submission by Kokeyama
I’m confused, IMDB, the industry database for films, is not a reliable source? The majority of films listed on Wikipedia have IMDB links. If IMDb is not suitable, what movie databases are? Kokeyama (talk) 21:15, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

The Garden revision.
Hello Heliosxeros,

I recently saw a message you put up on the article that I was creating called The Garden. You mentioned that IMDB was not a credible source so I removed all sources for IMDB from the page. I also cut down the plot line as you said it was too long.

Have a nice day, Oxxymoron — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oxxymoron (talk • contribs) 20:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Jack Muller / Danie Uys Park
Good day Heliosxeros

I have re-written certain aspects to be more formal, and any possible peacock terms have been removed

Thank you

User:Barry Ne —Preceding undated comment added 04:47, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

05:40:36, 5 April 2018 review of submission by Shanda911
Please check, I had completed the article sentences. and I'm waiting from last 28 days for re-review. Please have a look on a Draft "Mahakaal Mahakaali Temple". Shanda911 (talk) 05:40, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

07:26:16, 5 April 2018 review of submission by 2.110.71.97
Dear Heliosxeros. I am wondering why my wikipedia page got declined. Since the first draft I have added every reliable source I could find, that describes the company House of Real and not only the work they do. Nonetheless, productions companies are often defined by exactly the work they do. I have looked up other production companies to compare the number and type of sources, and it doesn't seem to me, that this page has less than average.

Would you consider reviewing it again?

All the best, Anna 2.110.71.97 (talk) 07:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I saw that your talkpage isn't created yet so I'll reply you here. At the time I reviewed your article, the sources were not enough. PS, the sources back then were poor. Hence, I declined your article. EROS message 11:36, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

de.NBI page was completly reworked!
Dear Helioxeros,

thank you for help. I completely reworked the page. Can you please again review the article?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:De.NBI_-_German_Network_for_Bioinformatics_Infrastructure

Thanks in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomAtdeNBIoffice (talk • contribs) 08:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

11:34:02, 6 April 2018 review of submission by InforgMM
Dear Reviewer, we have changed the references section, and rewritten it! Please check it again. Thank you and all the best.

InforgMM (talk) 11:34, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

14:28:50, 6 April 2018 review of submission by Uhuruguru
I am not too sure what exactly needs to be added. What additional documentation as verification can be submitted.

Uhuruguru (talk) 14:28, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

15:57:46, 6 April 2018 review of submission by Jericho55
Hello, I have added several more reputable sources such as NPR, The New York Times, and a journalistic tour of the Ponyride facility by MythBusters' Adam Savage. Please let me know if this helps get the article closer to being accepted.

Jericho55 (talk) 15:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

The Lutheran Church Building in Strand Street,Cape Town
Hi Heliosxeros

Thanks for the advice

I have added news paper and magazine references

Regards

User:Barry Ne —Preceding undated comment added 16:26, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

16:59:54, 6 April 2018 review of submission by Vertalis
Vertalis (talk) 16:59, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

I have added 4 more sources. Was there anything wrong with the existing ones?

Request on 02:16:20, 7 April 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Linah Nanziri
Greetings! It is completely understandable that you were unable to reply, supposedly because you were enjoying your Easter holidays (hopefully). I would also like to deeply appreciate your prompt response, nonetheless. I do understand your plausible concern in regards to including information of the charity's recent activities, however, this is likely to contrast the Wikipedia guidelines, as you stated earlier, which involves the inclusion of promotional information. This is quintessentially due to the fact that all the information stated in the article is staunchly evidenced by articles from notable and reliable media companies such as BBC, The Telegraph, Daily Monitor, among others. Additional information on the charity's recent activities can be found online, however, they are blogs, which are considered unreliable as per Wikipedia guidelines. I henceforth presume that adding any information which is not backed by reliable sources would appear quite promotional. However, more articles from notable sources are yet to be included online since the charity has had recent coverage. Once the additional information is published, the editing process on this article will commence and undergo review as well. I, hereby, proffer my request to you to publish the article since I am certain that I have met all Wikipedia requirements and standards.

Thank you.

Linah Nanziri (talk) 02:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi. Source you put in are better now. I see your dilemma with the blogs. In time, I am sure that media coverage will be given on the organisation and it is then that you can expand it further. Your draft will be reviewed by other reviewers soon. In the mean time, you are welcomed to contribute to Wikipedia on topics of your interest. Cheers and happy editing. EROS message 02:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

09:37:32, 7 April 2018 review of submission by Emonkhan
Hello there, I would like to ask few questions regarding your rejection of the article Nazmee Jannat. You pointed out that the mere mention will not be accepted as noteworthy for a figure, however, I provided news link of 9 prominent online newsportal of Bangladesh. In every of the news, the subject got proper highlight and the main topic of discussion. Unfortunately all the news are in Bengali, is it like this that you could not read it out properly as it is in foreign language and I should leave reference those are written in English? Thank you! Emonkhan (talk) 09:37, 7 April 2018 (UTC) Emonkhan (talk) 09:37, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Regarding the rejection of article Nazmee Jannat
Hello there,

Recently you have rejected the page Nazmee Jannat and mentioned the reason which is interesting. You said all the mentions in those references are not important, or mere mention. However all the references provided there are links from Bangladesh's prominent newsportal and the subject is the main point of discussion. I wonder, is it that you could not read an article written on foreign language properly? Should I add references those are written in English? Like link of English dailies? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emonkhan (talk • contribs) 09:41, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Steven Carson Booth
Steven Carson Booth Hi! I am the author of this page and am himself. You rejected the submission due to not enough reliable sources. I deleted the LinkedIn reference but have several other verifiable references including IMDB and other sources from the web. Can you remove your rejection or tell me how many additional sources are required if LinkedIn is insufficient? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hospibio (talk • contribs) 11:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * It is not encouraged to write your own autobiography as there maybe conflict of interest. Read: Identifying reliable sources. Basically, cite third party sources: mainstream publication, magazines, newspapers and books. Your sources must be independent from the subject and topic. Eg. homepages or official pages. Avoid user-generated content like twitter, fb or youtube. Moreover, IMDB is not considered a reliable source on Wiki as the former only provides listing. EROS message 13:34, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Neil Scott article
Hi there, Thanks so much for reviewing my article - I have added further citations to Neil's work on TV, his drama production details and rugby interview with the independent.

I am up to 6 separate citations - is there aomething else I am missing? Many thanks in advance - i hugely appreciate your support with this.

Kerry Wise. 7/4/18 KWise007 (talk) 14:32, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

AfC Reviewing
I felt it necessary to inform you that you apparently forgot to check User:Darkwolfz/sandbox for copyright violations. The entire article, save for the infobox and external link section, was copied from the about page of the subject's website. Happy editing!  Vermont &#124; reply here  11:08, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, i don't quite understand why you have declined my Vision Bus wiki page. Everything in there is factually correct and the relevant sources have been used. I feel like because you don't understand the topic, that you think it automatically has to be deleted. And quite frankly this is frustrating. I hope you take some time to accept the thread, Thanks. Manc123534

Submission declined: South African Mineral Reporting Codes
Thank you for reviewing my article. I have many third-party sources in my article, so I am struggling to understand what more can be done to improve it so that it may be accepted for submission. Please could you be more specific on which sections I need to change. Many thanks JLL87 (talk) 07:10, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

07:39:11, 9 April 2018 review of submission by Achecko
Dear Heliosxeros, Thank you for your feedback. Could please you advice which portions of the text should be rewritten? I put several references to reliable source on my article. Achecko (talk) 07:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

18:01:37, 9 April 2018 review of submission by Bobbydesmond
Hello Heliosxeros, I have added a large number of citations from independent, reliable news sources (including another article from Rolling Stone and numerous pieces from national and regional publications such as Time magazine, The Guardian, Slate Magazine, Current, Fox News, The Inquisitr, The Telegraph, International Business Times, Parade, CNET, Nieman Lab, Publisher's Weekly, Delaware Online, Mass Live, EContent Magazine, the National Post, The Washingtonian, the New Hampshire Union Leader, the Exeter Patch, Seacoast Online, Wicked Local, the Waltham Patch, Studio 10 News, the Kansas City Star, and more) in response to your comment that I needed more reliable sources. Please advice if this is sufficient or if I should be looking for something else in particular. Thanks! Bobbydesmond (talk) 18:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

19:04:35, 9 April 2018 review of submission by Linah Nanziri
Hello once again, I have not yet got a response from you, however, I would like to inform you that 2 new reliable sources have been added to the submission for the NGO. Any assistance rendered to me will highly be appreciated. Linah Nanziri (talk) 19:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Is there any possibility to check my article about Event marketing soon? It was corrected and my team has been waiting anxiuously for some news. Kind regards, Eventory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eventory (talk • contribs) 07:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

11:40:24, 10 April 2018 review of submission by Linah Nanziri
Greetings and thank you for the prompt response. Due to your unaltered concern regarding the 'promotional language,' I have decided to remove some information that would presumably appear promotional to one's eye. such as 'Water purification' to 'water', 'gender equality' to 'gender', 'waste management' to 'waste', 'pollution abatement,' to 'pollution' etcetera. I also changed the title from 'Summary of Campaigns' to 'Summary of Tasks' In spite the fact that most renowned NGO's on Wikipedia list the campaigns as I initially did. Nevertheless, I hereby request you to finally publish my article as I believe I meet all Wikipedia guidelines currently. Thank you.

I hereby request you to read the adjustments and feasibly publish my article, thank you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Linah_Nanziri Linah Nanziri (talk) 11:40, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Request on 17:01:38, 10 April 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Ponjit1234
edited the article and deleted the redundant references Ponjit1234 (talk) 17:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC) Ponjit1234 (talk) 17:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Karena Evans... explain this one to me.
How is Karena Evans not notable? 🤔 Billboard (magazine), CBC, Complex, Vogue (magazine), Teen Vogue, Vogue España, Yahoo, GQ and even the infamous Daily Mail are examples of sources that have articles on her, not interviews. Are those not "significant" enough coverage? If it isn't winning the highest honor of her field in her country should complement that.... Articles get by with two sources these days smh.Trillfendi (talk) 17:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Flag
Hi, Heliosxeros. I've noticed that you are an AfC reviewer but don't yet have the New Page Reviewer flag. Can you please head over to PERM and request it?

As part of a larger plan to increase cooperation between New Page Patrol and Articles for creation, we are trying to get as many of the active AfC reviewers as possible under the NPR user flag (per this discussion). Unlike the AfC request list, the NPR flag carries no obligation to review new articles, so I'm not asking you to help out at New Page Patrol if you don't want to, just to request the flag. Of course, if it is something you would be interested in, you can have a look at the NPP tutorial. Please mention that you are an active AfC reviewer in your application. Cheers and thanks for helping out at AfC, —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  06:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

11:13, 11 April 2018 review of submission (FloTHERM) by Kristinalaw
Hi Heliosxeros

Thank you for your feedback so far, I’m curious as to the specific details that led this page to be rejected.

The basis for this entry was on the same ground as existing like-for-like tools already on Wikipedia, namely SimScale, Ansys Fluent, CONSELF among others. I also modeled the page format off of Simcenter Amesim.

I really appreciate feedback and suggestions, is there any advice you can offer or adjustments I should make? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kristinalaw (talk • contribs) 10:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

13:04:42, 10 April 2018 review of submission by Linah Nanziri
No, I am not being paid to write this article, so that is not relevant. I am part of the cause and my team recommended we put it on Wikipedia as it has been written about by notable media companies e.g. BBC, The Telegraph, Daily Monitor among others. Kindly, publish the page since I believe I meet all requirements. Thank you. Linah Nanziri (talk) 13:04, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * as part of the 'cause' you are not supposed to edit or create this article on behalf of your cause. Please see the COI notice on your talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hello Heliosxeros. Your account has been added to the " " user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia; if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk. The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:49, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
 * Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
 * Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

09:51:14, 12 April 2018 review of submission by 2003:C0:8F04:9293:CDD2:1D6D:EDC8:6C48
The article is in draft status. Therefore it should be edited by other users in such a way that the content is presented objectively. Compared to other articles, a similar structure was chosen.


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArangoDB
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MarkLogic
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo4j
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cockroach_Labs

... and many more

I think a rejection is exaggerated. The described database technology is new and should get an entry in Wikipedia as such.

2003:C0:8F04:9293:CDD2:1D6D:EDC8:6C48 (talk) 09:51, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of St. Chika
This page should not be speedily deleted because... This artiste has been extensively covered by the press for his hit single Higher for which he was nominated for the Exousia Gospel Music Awards. He was nominated for four categories at the EGMA, an impressive feat --Sonoafricano (talk) 12:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

The singer has enjoyed favourable airplay from several radio stations across the country. He has been critically acclaimed by music pundits to be the next sensation in the Nigerian music industry--Sonoafricano (talk) 12:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Prod
While I agree with you re: this, unfortunately prods can be contested by anyone for any reason at all (save for maybe users in violation of block/ban). CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  12:50, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

16:09:15, 12 April 2018 review of submission by Llihac88
Llihac88 (talk) 16:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I would like to resubmit the draft for Rise of Industry but you rejected the initial submission because it was not adequately supported by reliable sources. I've read the page of what constitutes reliable sources but i'm still confused. I referenced an article from Kotaku, which is one of the leading publications/websites in the video game industry - is this not classed as reliable or are you saying that the article needs MORE reliable sources. Thank you in advance. Llihac88 (talk) 16:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

SKINmed
I don't understand what is missing, as I modeled this after the write-ups for other medical journals.

LarrydermLarryderm (talk) 17:33, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

17:40:22, 13 April 2018 review of submission by Anna.haywood
Hello Heliosxeros, Thanks for your feedback. My sources include two of the top research libraries in Canada, the largest English Daily paper in Montreal, government sources and a national magazine. I understand the government one does not prove notability, simply being a register of the charity, but I am curious why the other influential sources are not legitimate? Thank you, any advice is very appreciated. Anna.haywood (talk) 17:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

I Have submitted 18 Articles on Wikipedia for my Submission those are 100% on the Topic of the Film, Please read the Articles Properly before take any Action.
Due to respect I just want to know the reason of decline, I have submitted approx 18 news articles on the film topic included one "TIMES OF India" Article which is more prestigious article source in India, and you have rejected my articles, i can show you such a existing article on Wikipedia which don't have a single news article please check -1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kichu_Na_Bola_Kotha, 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rana_Mazumder, Even i can show you this kind of Wikipedia Articles more then this, Now Let me know what to do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritarko2015 (talk • contribs) 09:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

09:34:05, 14 April 2018 review of submission by Ritarko2015
I have submitted more then 15th News articles on the Topic, included one "The Times of India" article which is very prestigious News source from India, still i don't know why my submission continuously deleted, Please take a RE-REVIEW of my submission. Thanks & regards Ritarko2015 09:34, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Official Website & News Article of - Lust a cinema 2018
Please have a look 1. https://www.lustacinema.com/ 2. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bengali/movies/news/city-filmmaker-sudeep-ranjan-sarkars-film-to-premiere-at-cannes/articleshow/63625038.cms 3. http://www.financialsamachar.com/nez-moving-pixels-upcoming-film-lust-combines-poetry-and-painting/ 3. http://hnexpress.in/blog/2018/02/22/lust-is-not-a-only-movie/ 4. https://www.jiyobangla.com/news/lust-the-unison-of-aphrodisia-poetry 5. ttp://radiobanglanet.com/new-independent-film-sudeep-ranjan-sarkar/ 6. http://khasskhobor.com/lust-to-make-aware/ 7. http://hollybollytolly.com/2018/02/17/lust/ 8. http://www.tollykata.com/articles/movie-news/sudeep-ranjan-sarkars-lust-is-a-romance-between-poetry-and-painting 9. http://abptakmaa.com/2018/02/16/sudeep-sarkar-makes-movies-that-talks-of-human-journey-beyond-borders 10. https://bolly-tolly-news.blogspot.in/2018/02/srss-latest-venture-lust-is-most.html 11. http://www.tollykata.com/articles/movie-news/sudeep-ranjan-sarkars-lust-is-a-romance-between-poetry-and-painting 12. http://sholoanabangaliana.in/2018/02/09/sudeep-ranjan-sarkars-upcoming-film-lust-combines-poetry-and-painting/ 13. http://khonjkhobor.in/AllBinodonPosts/lust/ 14. http://ibgnews.com/world-poetic-cinema-waiting-lust-movie-director-srs/ 15. http://www.enigmatixweb.com/preview-of-movie-lust-an-innitiative-of-srs/ 16. http://www.thetimesofbengal.com/the-world-of-poetic-cinema-will-get-another-gem-lust-very-soon-an-awesome-creation-of-srs/ 17. FACEBOOK - https://www.facebook.com/lustacinema2018/ 18. TWITTER - https://twitter.com/lustacinema 19. INSTAGRAM - https://www.instagram.com/lustacinema 20. IMDB - https://m.imdb.com/title/tt8237252/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritarko2015 (talk • contribs) 09:43, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Thanks for your replay, with the base of "The Times of India" and some other value source can you please update my submission, i am sending you another two articles, which is located at Kolkata, West Bengal, India please have a look, Thanks 1. https://m.dailyhunt.in/news/india/bangla/mahanagar+bengali-epaper-benmaha/aasache+last+kaby+o+chitr+meshano+chalacchitr-newsid-85429347?ss=pd&s=a 2. http://bengali.mahanagar24x7.com/lust-the-new-film-directde-bye-sudeep-ranjan-sarkarer/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritarko2015 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

i am not attached Facebook, Twitter as a Article just want to show you this film source is authentic and real, i have submitted articles more then 15th including Times of India, Just for Query can you please have a look on this articles 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kichu_Na_Bola_Kotha, 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rana_Mazumder - which don't have a single article even. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritarko2015 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Pyramid over Moscow
Hello. You declined this Draft:Pyramid over Moscow recently and I just wanted to ask you to elaborate a bit what is wrong with the article? Thanks in advance.Aleksandr Reznichenko (talk) 06:38, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

03:25:57, 17 April 2018 review of submission by Skruis
Hi,

First I would like to thank you for reviewing my article. It is my first article and I would like to make sure it is a good one. Can you provide me some guidance on how I might improve the article? I read about being an essay and wasn't sure where to start editing.

Many thanks, Scott

Skruis (talk) 03:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Request on 03:32:42, 17 April 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Skruis
Hi,

I would like input on editing this article. It is my first article. I went through the tutorials, but am sure there is more to learn. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Skruis#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation%3A_World_Scientists%27_Warning_to_Humanity%3A_A_Second_Notice_%28April_13%29

Many Thanks, Scott

Skruis (talk) 03:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Request on 14:01:03, 17 April 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Kmehta9
Hi - I do not understand how much further coverage this film needs. We have been published in Hello Pakistan magazine and Women's Own magazine. There are numerous reviews, multiple awards, and ten film festivals. We are using this documentary to help a student get into college here. What more do you need from me to have this page go live?

Kmehta9 (talk) 14:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)Kruti Mehta

Kmehta9 (talk) 14:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Jason Anderson (motorcyclist)
The subject of this page is about to become the 2018 Supercross champion. He is 39 points ahead of his nearest competitor. Even if he fails to win the championship he is notable for this seasons performance. Supercross.com and the article there is a reliable source. Just because the article is brief does not make the story any less noteworthy. -- Cdw ♥'s ♪ ♫ ( talk ) 20:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Please review the draft article before I resubmit it. -- Cdw ♥'s ♪ ♫ ( talk ) 20:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

03:24:37, 16 April 2018 review of submission by 70.184.87.220
I just want to understand why the page was turned down. I am in the band and want to know what i can do to get the page finished and approved. 70.184.87.220 (talk) 03:24, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you very much for your message, it has helped me enormously. I just wanted to clarify that the lack of sources isn't a mistake on my side - the topic which I am writing about is quite new and not many people have issued their opinions so far. Especially, there aren't many English sources. The most important publications were made in Polish or Danish, both of which are mentioned in the sources section. Any advice on what to do in that sort of situation? Eventory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eventory (talk • contribs) 09:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Eventory, generally what editors normally do is they will cite the foreign sources as well. Wikipedia does accept foreign sources. Articles on korean drama do cite korean sources. They are welcome provided they satisfy the basic requirements for a reliable source. EROS message 10:31, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

12:43:05, 18 April 2018 review of submission by 2600:8803:7A00:976A:9CA9:F5F7:B671:6066
Why do we have to wait almost 4 months that is not too soon. Because they haven't played their spring game yet. 2600:8803:7A00:976A:9CA9:F5F7:B671:6066 (talk) 12:43, 18 April 2018 (UTC)


 * 2600:8803:7A00:976A:9CA9:F5F7:B671:6066, well then, when the game has been played, only will the article be complete. only then will be better for u to submit. EROS message

16:18:03, 18 April 2018 review of submission by Hananmuzaffar786
Hananmuzaffar786 (talk) 16:18, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

13:19:13, 19 April 2018 review of submission by Tomp-uk
Hello, I am very keen to make this an acceptable entry. Could you be more specific about where the submission lacks inline citations? I have not yet made any changes. I am aware that the early life and education section lacks references. However, there is nothing published either in books, journals or online that can substantiate this information. I put it in as "interesting background". Should it be removed? Then the section on early work again does not have references online. There are paper version of the relevant papers. Do I simply add those as references even though no one can find them online? The other sections are, I believe, adequately referenced. I am adding a number of references to papers in journals. thanks for your help. Best regards Tom Tomp-uk (talk) 13:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Request on 14:12:17, 19 April 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Kmehta9
Okay thank you I'll ask the help desk. No I'm not paid or writing on behalf of someone. We are trying to gain recognition as the documentary itself is a personal statement to college for the boy starring in it.

Kmehta9 (talk) 14:12, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Kruti Mehta

Kmehta9 (talk) 14:12, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

14:37:23, 20 April 2018 review of submission by BronecOn
Good afternoon, I wanted to ask about what problems there are with my article on Notional defined contribution systems.

I wanted to write on this topic, because I came across it during work on my bachelor thesis and have found no page on wikipedia explaining it. I don't see what the problem with my sources is, as Axel Börsch-Supan, Richard F Disney and Robert Holzmann are all well-regarded authorities on the topic of pensions without any personal interest in it.

So I assume that there is problem in the structure of the article. I may for example include more about history of NDC systems or different parameters across countries which implemented them, but the positives and negatives are important part of the article since NDC systems are often suggested as alternative to classical PAYG pension systems.

Thank you for any advice. I am open to making any number of changes, but I want to first find out where the problem is.

BronecOn (talk) 14:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Correcting Draft - CTXT
Hi Heliosxeros, Thank you for your comments on my draft. I removed the unverifiable sources/information from the article, except for things like quotes from the website. Are those ok to keep, or should I remove them as well?

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artichofa (talk • contribs) 09:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Up to you to keep it. I saw source #5. Its the webpage of the company. Its advised not to include webpages.

I understand, but I think in this case it makes sense as I'm using the website as a primary source. I removed the unnecessary references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artichofa (talk • contribs) 09:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

10:40:21, 23 April 2018 review of submission by InforgMM
Dear Heliosxeros! We have changed the the article "Monika Mécs", please check it again, Thank you! InforgMM (talk) 10:40, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

19:57:25, 23 April 2018 review of submission by 2605:E000:7C48:2400:2111:E6C2:3AED:9824
Hello. I'm requesting a re-review simply for the sake that all information included here is reliable, and is verified within the article by reliable and varied sources. Please explain as to why this was declined, and thank you for your time. 2605:E000:7C48:2400:2111:E6C2:3AED:9824 (talk) 19:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * There is no depth in your writing and there is not depth in the company too. The company must be mature enough to be notable and your writing must establish it too. As of yet, the company is not mature enough. Read WP:NCOMPANY. Moreover, your sources are crucial to giving a claim of significance to your article's notability. WP:RS for reliable sources. EROS message 04:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Review of Draft:Strata Systems Inc.
Hello Heliosxeros,

For the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Strata_Systems_Inc. Strata Systems Inc. draft], can you point out to me the sections that sounded like an advertisement? Is it multiple sections or citations that are the problem? I would greatly appreciate some advice on how to make this article better. Thank you! Adapt16 (talk) 15:54, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello Heliosxeros! Thank you for responding to my request for advice, it was extremely helpful. I will work on the draft and use your examples as reference to improve the page. Thank you again! Adapt16 (talk) 14:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

17:58:52, 24 April 2018 review of submission by Wileyfh
Heliosxeros,

Thanks for your comments. I tried to write this article from a neutral point of view and not as an advertisement. It factually describes the IBM 4768 without making any advertising claims. The article is very similar to published Wikipedia articles about previous IBM HSMs. Please see these articles as reference: IBM 4758, IBM 4764, IBM_4765, IBM_4767.

I've added several additional independent references to the article.

Please let me know what additional steps I need to take. Thanks! Wileyfh (talk) 17:58, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

18:00:32, 24 April 2018 review of submission by Warren363
Dear Editor,

Thanks for your feedback. I am hoping you could give me some additional pointers on how to clean up the Genovation Cars page. I used several of the other car companies on Wikipedia like Rimac as an example and cut out all the items that went beyond just the facts. I don't work for Genovation, but I'm a huge fan of their mission to create electric supercars! Any advice would be much appreciated. thanks... Warren363 (talk) 18:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC) Warren363 (talk) 18:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Dear Heliosxeros,

I have been trying to edit Monika Mecse's page in English quite a few times  by now, to achieve the citation that is acceptable for you. If this is not acceptable yet, could you please help and cite it in the way that it needs to be. I would really appreciate your help!!

Kind Regards

09:31:46, 27 April 2018 review of submission by 86.59.195.178
Dear Heliosxeros, we made the inline citations!

Please check it!

thank you, and all the best! 86.59.195.178 (talk) 09:31, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

10:58:39, 28 April 2018 review of submission by Surendranath Nayak
Surendranath Nayak (talk) 10:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

What type of modification I have to do? Kindly give me instructions.

Brian McCauley submission
Hi, Thank you for reviewing my article submission for Brian McCauley. I would like to know which sources I have used are unreliable and which do not fit the guidelines. After reading the wiki guideline page it appears they fit the guidelines for sources.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by I Toast My Toast (talk • contribs) 17:18, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

18:44:46, 28 April 2018 review of submission by Riptide360
Riptide360 (talk) 18:44, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

re: Draft:Hope_Services Heliosxeros - I could use your help. Can you flag/delete the parts of Hope Services that sound like an advertisement? The best places to work award can be nuked. What else? I have no relationship to this developmental disability non-profit other than spending more hours than I've wanted to create what started out as a stub for a local non profit that I was surprised to not find in Wikipedia. In researching it I discovered they are a fairly large service that handles most of San Francisco Bay Area's state funding for these services. Much appreciated. Riptide360 (talk) 18:44, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Request on 14:28:11, 29 April 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Surendranath Nayak
Surendranath Nayak (talk) 14:28, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

I have made the changes in the draft of Odisha Bigyan Academy as per your instructions. Hope it will be publishable now. If anything else is to be done, kindly let me know.

Request on 15:05:45, 30 April 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Hightondaniel
I feel that 'Superprof' has unfairly been deemed un-notable. The sources included are reputable radio stations, tv channels and business magazines here in france. In these articles, tv and radio reportings Superprof was not only mentioned but often the main subject of discussion. This not only shows a certain degree of "fame" or "importance," but at the very least it shows that it has "attracted notice".

Hightondaniel (talk) 15:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft comment
In commenting on Draft:Phil de Picciotto, you wrote "Some parts not inclined." What does that mean? WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:32, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Greetings, WikiDan61 . The phrase "Some parts not inclined" that I wrote was to tell the editor that some points are not inclined with citation. It was to my understanding that BLPs need incline citation. While the draft has a few parts that were not inclined. Hence, I wrote that phrase, "Some parts not inclined". Eg, last paragraph of Career, most parts of Advocacy and Personal Life. If there is anywhere that I should be pinpointed, do enlighten me. EROS message 10:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Articles in general should have inline (not inclined) citations. Your choice of wording was incorrect and therefore somewhat confusing. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:44, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Gosh, this is embarrassing. I think I have been using the wrong word all this while. Thanks. EROS message 06:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Voluntary_Organization_for_Professional_Evaluation
Dear Heliosxeros:

I understand that you have declined my submission for Draft:Voluntary_Organization_for_Professional_Evaluation on the account that "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability." I don't understand that. The same criticism was made of the previous version of this page and I invested in beefing up the Use of the Term section, highlighting some 18 different scholarly references (journals, books, UN reports, etc.) that discuss VOPEs in one way or another. In program evaluation, VOPEs are a critical building block of the professional ecosystem; that's what I am attempting to show.

May I respectfully request your reconsideration or a more precise indication of where the submission is lacking?

Thanks in advance.

Benoît Gauthier benoit@evaluationcanada.ca — Preceding unsigned comment added by B.gauthier.quebec (talk • contribs) 00:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

May 3, 2018

Dear Heliosxeros:

Thanks for your response to my message on Draft:Voluntary_Organization_for_Professional_Evaluation. As I don't see how I can "reply" to that message, I am adding feedback on this page.

In your reply, you restated the criteria of notability, verifiability and independence. I don't see how the sources I cited do not qualify. They are
 * Learned (academic) peer-reviewed journals: American Journal of Evaluation, Evaluation, Evaluation and Program Planning, Evaluation Capacity Development Journal, Zeitschrift fur Evaluation, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation;
 * Books or book chapters published by reputable sources: Sage, Information Age Publishing, Springer, UNICEF.

Some of them deal with the topic of VOPEs at length, other more briefly. All are independent in that VOPEs are not one organization: they are a category of not for profit organization.

So, I repeat my request. Please explain how and why the sources offered in this article are deemed not providing notability, verifiability and independence.

B.gauthier.quebec

May 4, 2018

Hi. On my Talk page, you wrote "You stated that you sourced journals and sources like Sage, Information Age Publishing, Springer, UNICEF. Journals are a good source as reference. However, for websites like UNICEF, that will be primary sources. It is best to have a diverse range of references, not only primary sources. Cite third party sources: mainstream publications, newspapers, magazines or books. Stay away from homepages and official websites."

The reference I made to UNICEF was UNICEF as a publisher. UNICEF published a book entirely on the topic that I am trying to justify as notable. It does not come more notable than that, does it? In this context, Sage, Information Age Publishing, Springer, and UNICEF are book publishers who decided that a subject like VOPEs was important enough to devote books or parts of books on it.

You also wrote "Moreover, by any chance, are you writing on behalf of the organisation or for someone in the organisation. Or, are you being paid by the organisation or an elsewhere party to write this draft? If so, it is advised to declare your paid editing." This article is not about an organization; it is about a type of non-profit organizations. I am not paid by anyone to prepare this article.

Will you reconsider the notability, verifiability and independence of my sources?

B.gauthier.quebec —Preceding undated comment added 10:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

More on May 4, 2018

I have added more sources, but not of the popular kind like newspapers that you are requesting. Voluntary Organizations for Professional Organizations are not a hot topic for Joe Public. They are a specialized type of not-for-profit organizations like Not-for-profit arts organization or Artist cooperative; there are no newspaper references on these pages.

You don't find references to newspapers on many (I would venture most) Wikipedia pages. See for example, New York State Route 343, Cross in the Mountains, Quantity that are less specialized than my draft page on VOPEs but still lack newspaper references.

So, in summary, I don't understand why references in newspapers would give credence to the existence of a specialized term. Which authority can I take this debate to now?

B.gauthier.quebec —Preceding undated comment added 13:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

23:24:32, 5 May 2018 review of submission by Ara12eno
Hi, thanks for your feedback! Could you please specify which section(s) is too much essay-like? And I will try to correct it. (We're a group creating this article as a part of a school-project). Best regards, Ara12eno Ara12eno (talk) 23:24, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Review of Video Star page
"Cite third party sources: mainstream publications, newspapers, magazines or books." ... "Many sources like allkpop are not allowed." I did and have, up to three independent and mainstream news websites and sources - not more, because it wasn't unnecessary.

"No user-generated sources, Wikipedia Korea included" I can remove that reference, but judging from this being the reason why it was rejected, it seems perhaps you might have only seen and clicked on my first reference source, before rejecting?

How else should I improve? Assuming you have indeed looked at all 4 of the sources referenced. How are the other 3 sources unacceptable?Jasminelep (talk) 15:06, 6 May 2018 (UTC) Response: "So what you said clicked on my first reference source, before rejecting will be you at the end of confusion." I had understood that wiki korea was a bad reference and have thus removed it after reading your review, it was not a confusion. My confusion was your statement requesting for third party sources - which were #3 and #4 (I realized after that #2 could be half-considered a source from the website itself, so I changed that to dongha sports - which was basically just quoting the source, but it is third party) Sources #3 and #4 remained the same as before. But I appreciate the correction for 1 and 2. Meanwhile, while Running Man is a good example for layout, it isn't a good comparison as the two shows are far apart both in reach - from public channel/cable channel, international/less-so, and longer history. Many of the content on that page are also questionable as they are opinion written such as character relationships. For my article I based it off of the wiki page of "Radio Star (TV series)", as well as a few other shows from the same broadcast channel. I do have plans on further improving both this & definitely the episode list in the future, but I believed that at the moment this was sufficient for a basic layout/page at point of creation. The show itself also does not have that long of a history and much controversy/specials to talk about, more to be elaborated on episode list rather.

submission at Articles for creation: Biomechanical Stimulation (BMS)
Hi Heliosxeros,

Thanks for reviewing the article so quickly, I'm a newbie at this and its harder than it looks, will take your advice and summarize the salient points to make it read from a more neutral view point before resubmitting. Thanks Dr Mildran (talk) 22:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Review Orange Corners
Dear Heliosxeros,

Thanks for your quick review on the new page. It's my first Wikipedia article, so I could use some more information on how to improve it. The comment I got was that it was written too much like an advertisement. I have tried to cleanse it as much as possible from prejudice information and focus mainly on the history and organizational structure, however I thought that the goal of the organisation was noteworthy. I found that there was little information on the organisation, though it's a Dutch governmental programme that operates internationally. I figured there was some need of information on this programme, since it is mentioned increasingly in Dutch and African newsarticles. Everything in the article is factual and I added different sources (different newspapers in different countries, Dutch governmental papers and scientific research on the subjects background). I therefore don't completely understand the comment I received. It is definitely not meant to be an advertisement. (Esthrikov (talk) 08:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC))

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Testia,_an_Airbus_company
Hello dear Heliosxeros,

Thanks a lot for your previous review of my article. Would you mind having a second look?

I have made several changes, and I beleive after all those versions we are getting closer now :).

Cheers and thanks in advance!

Teddy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Testia,_an_Airbus_company — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teddy.canadas (talk • contribs) 10:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Khan long hin
Hi. Sorry for not directly dropping you a message earlier, but I've manually accepted the AfC submission for Draft:Khan long hin, which you previously declined. (I used undo so that it would trigger a notification to let you know, but in hindsight it probably wasn't the best idea and could have easily been taken the wrong way, so apologies for that.) As others have noted, you can take it to AfD if you disagree, but I think the subject is clearly notable. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:08, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

06:23:46, 9 May 2018 review of submission by Vkumawat21
hi about one night out all information source is linked. also imdb linked. please review carefully. Vimal Kumawat 06:23, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Miss United Continents U.S.
Hello Heliosxeros. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Miss United Continents U.S., a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''if Miss United Continent is notable, sub-events are significant enough to pass A7. I suggest you take all those articles to AFD instead.''' Thank you. SoWhy 08:58, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Alone cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Alone cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lay (entertainer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wang Xun and Wang Bo ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Lay_%28entertainer%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Lay_%28entertainer%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

08:06:50, 14 May 2018 review of submission by 46.130.251.58
46.130.251.58 (talk) 08:06, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, can you tell me what was a reason for decline?
 * Greetings. You will need to inline your references used to the sentences and points. That is the reason for my declination. And, add in more reliable sources to support the notability of your article. EROS message 12:57, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Request on 15:50:13, 22 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Irfan.noori
Thanks for all guidence. Kindly have a look now.

Irfan.noori (talk) 15:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Copyvio checks
Heya, just wanted to drop you a note about copyvios checking. I just came across Draft:Attack of Life: The Bang Tango Movie, which you declined and tagged as copyvio, but the only "offending" text I could find were some longquotes which had sources for them. While not ideal to include, these don't violate our copyright rules and are acceptable. In other words, if something is in quotes and there's a reference, it's usually not a violation (unless it's a huge quote). Cheers, Primefac (talk) 12:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I also just noticed that you declined this draft back in March! Sorry if someone already mentioned this to you... Primefac (talk) 12:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:
 * WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags
 * Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:
 * A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons
 * There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy
 * Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English News Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.
 * Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
 * The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Der Unsichtbare
Hello Heliosxeros and thank you for reviewing my draft of the German film “Der Unsichtbare” a month ago, which you rejected for lack of notability. Since then, I have looked at the Wiki criteria for film notability and added references which tick a couple more boxes, i.e. that it was shown at a film festival and had a significant impact on the career of one of its leading actors (albeit due to its faillure!)  The article also references a couple of independent reputable reviews (Althen and die Zeit) and the awards the film won. So I think the article now shows the film’s notability and so have resubmitted it for publication but defer to your judgment. Incidentally the film already has a published article on Wikipedia.de. Regards DuncanR2

Hi There,

I tried reaching out to you a few weeks ago (30 Apr) but did not get a response.

I feel that 'Draft:Superprof' has unfairly been deemed un-notable. The sources included are reputable Francophone radio stations, tv channels, and business magazines. In these articles, tv and radio reportings Superprof was not only mentioned, but often the main subject of discussion. This not only shows a certain degree of "fame" or "importance," but at the very least it shows that it has "attracted notice".

Your return and comments would be much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hightondaniel (talk • contribs) 13:32, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive! Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
 * Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: NPPbarnstar SE.png. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: RR3217-0014 100 rubles USSR 1989 Gold avers.png, Swiss-Commemorative-Coin-1991-CHF-250-reverse.png, Coin of Kazakhstan 500Thinker averse.png, US-$1000-SC-1878-FR-346a-PROOF.jpg.
 * Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Hope Services
Thanks for reviewing and revising the draft Hope Services. Unfortunately it wasn't enough to pass muster under review and the article has now been deleted. Thanks for your efforts anyways. Riptide360 (talk) 22:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Reasons for your rejection of the Moy Tung article's sources and their coverage
Hello Heliosxeros,

It seems the sources I cited meet Wikipedia's criteria; wondering about your POV. I also posted these comments on the Talk page for the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Moy_Tung

I said in the Edit Summary re: my last submission: "I deleted some text/paragraphs. Moy Tung and his school have a significant place in the Ving Tsun lineage & martial arts history. He's been teaching Moy Yat Kung Fu for over 30 years + has 3 generations of students teaching under him. In addition to his school's website, I've cited 5 mainstream media reports on Moy Tung, a Moy Yat book and now I've also cited Moy Yat's own website" On the Wikipedia Notability page is says: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability The sources I cited are all mainstream and reliable, and the articles are focused on Moy Tung and what he and/or his branch are doing. These sources are the Richmond Times-Dispatch (origin 1850); styleweekly.com (est. 1982); two articles from rvamag.com (est. 2005) and an interview in wingchunillustrated.com (est. 2011) with Aaron Vyvial, a student of Moy Tung's who talks about him. WC Illustrated is the premier magazine devoted to wing chun kung fu, one of the world's most popular martial arts. If Moy Tung's student is a sifu significant enough for an interview, that implies his teacher, the source of his kung fu, is even more significant. In addition, Moy Yat considered his student Moy Tung significant to tell two stories involving him in his book, A Legend of Kung Fu Masters (1989). In addition, Moy Tung and a number of his students are in the branch list on Moy Yat's website, Moyyat.com. Moy Yat was one of the top disciples of Yip Man (Ip Man), a Chinese cultural hero and world-famous martial artist about whom at least 6 theatre-release films were made, in addition to being the only teacher Bruce Lee acknowledged. Moy Yat has his own page on wikipedia, and is famous in his own right for martial arts, acupuncture, writing and art in a number of mediums. That one of his close personal students has been teaching for 30 years and now has more than 20 branches in his lineage, in 3 generations, seems notable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Moy_Tung — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gorkelobb (talk • contribs) 21:28, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Resubmission
I have fixed the "Alaric Naude" page as per your instructions. Sorry because I am new to this could you please check that the changes are correct. I will add more information as I find it. Have a Great day QTPai (talk) 07:53, 13 July 2018 (UTC)QTPai

Rejected Article Draft: Cooperative Mechanisms under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement
Dear Heliosxeros, first of all thanks for your feedback. Based on your recommendations, I have now adapted the article and resubmissioned it. I've diversified sources to maintain a more neutral position. In the section "Implementation" I did my best to streamline it. At the moment, I do not see the possibility to formulate even more factually (than I have done in my latest changes), as the Article 6 rule book of the Paris Agreement is currently in the development/discussion and demands a more discursive style in my opinion. In other words, a too much factual style would limit the meaningfulness. I hope that the article can now meet your requirements. Otherwise I am grateful for further tips. Many greetings gornim9v — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gornim9v (talk • contribs) 18:00, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:George Mahan Jr.
Hello Heliosxeros. I added some more content and citations. There is quite a big of coverage in the JSTOR artocle, NRHP documents, and the book about rural schools. He designed numerous notable buildings. So I think notability is pretty well established now. Thanks for your consideration. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:53, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Request on 10:56:00, 20 July 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by GrahamBates
Hi thanks for reviewing my page StudentCrowd.

I was just wondering if links from University Wikipedia pages count as notable references? We currently have 4 mentions from university wikipedia pages. Thanks

George Bates 10:56, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * So sorry, Wikipedia cannot source itself. Per WP:RS, give newspapers, magazines, journals, articles of third party and official origin. EROS message 11:00, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Request to review
I have reedited the previous content and removed lots lines which sound promotional. I have a request please review my previous changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonmaximus (talk • contribs) 07:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC)