User talk:Helixweb

santa rita jail rules
whats edit warring ? Sickero (talk) 09:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Sickero, edit warring is what you and 74.228.158.68 were doing, reverting each other's edits repeatedly without discussing on the talk page or working towards consensus. If you guys both do that, the article suffers and consensus is never reached. In regards to the santa rita rules, if you have a source for it, I would definitely recommend putting it in, but I would summarize it, instead of just pasting the whole thing into the article. Thanks and please let me know if you have any other questions.Helixweb (talk) 18:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I understand, i didn't know it had a name. Sickero (talk) 11:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Assistance
Thanks for the quick overview. Regards, Rudget . 11:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xlibris (2nd nomination)
The page on Xlibris has been totally rewritten. You might want to reconsider your !vote here, especially given that I've withdrawn. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up, the article looks better.Helixweb (talk) 19:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Email
Did you email me about the Maria auxiliadora article? Tan  |   39  05:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * No, not me, sorry. Didn't even know you could email editors off-wikipedia?Helixweb (talk) 03:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * In the toolbox box on the left panel of your wikipedia browser window, when looking at a user page or a user talk page, there should be link for 'E-mail this user' if that user has e-mail enabled. Narson (talk) 12:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks.Helixweb (talk) 06:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Ronan O'Rahilly and Condom edits (objections)
Dear Helixweb, I have responded to your objections on my My Talk page. I would greatly appreciate if you would consider them and respond.

Aimulti (talk) 09:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the response, but I believe the consensus is that most of what you have contributed is faulty information sourced from old or inaccurate or unsubstantial sources. I do like your edits on Soho, however. Helixweb (talk) 06:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:124.149.83.104


A tag has been placed on User talk:124.149.83.104, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Swarm   X 21:57, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)