User talk:HelloWorld-editor

June 2020
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 05:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rakib Al Hasan (writer)


A tag has been placed on Rakib Al Hasan (writer), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 04:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Review
Hi, sorry have been offline today so didn't see the article. You could ask Vinegarymass911 for more details about why your article was deleted and there is also WP:Deletion review, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Sticking annual readership charts on other people's talk pages, as you have done over and over again, is disruptive. In general, a substantial proportion of your edits (not just this) have been inappropriate. Please slow down, read all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and consider focusing your attention on improving articles instead of disrupting people's talk pages. --Yamla (talk) 11:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * STOP! This is your last chance. Your edits have continued to be disruptive. --Yamla (talk) 11:55, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

I think we should start a movement to leave Wikipedia soon. I live in Bangladesh. I am currently studying for a Bachelor of Business Administration. I've been on Wikipedia for a few months now. To be honest, my thinking changed when it came to writing on Wikipedia. I never understood the issues. But today I was bored to do that. I'm very tired. I am really disappointed to see such outrage of people. The admins here are behaving like a kind of racist. I see a lot of bad articles that I don't think are worthy of being on Wikipedia. And Wikipedia has some policies that only admins use for their own purposes. Why not because all the unemployed people are doing these jobs. People understand and know all about this misdeed now. I understand very well that everyone here is biased. If it weren't for donations from companies like Google, no one would know Wikipedia today. Don't be afraid that one day you will have to write an article about this #TimeToleaveWikipedia.--HelloWorld-editor (talk) 12:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't make ludicrous claims of racism. That's deeply inappropriate. I have no idea what race you are and until you stated it, no idea where you lived. --Yamla (talk) 12:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

All you guys can only do is delete the article and block us. I don't know what is easier than this. Writing a new article is beyond your reach.#TimeToleaveWikipedia.--HelloWorld-editor (talk) 12:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:HelloWorld-editor. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —— Serial # 13:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)