User talk:Hellocheeky

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
You have received these suggestions because we are currently running a study to see if SuggestBot is helpful for newly registered Wikipedia editors. Normally SuggestBot only makes suggestions for users who ask for them explicitly on the SuggestBot request page. We will not post suggestions on your talk page again unless you ask for them. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find a complete consent form with contact information on the SuggestBot Study page.

SuggestBot picks the articles you might be interested in based on the articles you've edited and using a number of different techniques: following links from them to other articles, matching articles based on their content, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedia users. It tries to recommend only articles that others have marked as needing work, such as stub articles that need to be made longer, clean-up articles that need writing help, and so on. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you choose to participate we encourage you to leave feedback on these suggestions, which you can most easily do here by editing your user talk page. We'll stop by later to read them.

Regards,, project researcher and SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

David of King&
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of David of King&, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.gedmartin.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=134.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:58, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: David of King's
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as David of King's, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from https://www.createspace.com/3481622, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:David of King's and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, David of King's, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:David of King's with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:David of King's. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:David of King's saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 13:47, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Your addition to David Blaize has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Biography of Alcibiades
Dear User, I added E. F. Benson's Biography of Alcibiades to the article for further reading. It is a highly engaging account of his life and times and it is one of the best biographical sources in print in addition to Steven Forde's The Ambition to Rule: Alcibiades and the Politics of Imperialism in Thucydides, 1989, and Walter Ellis's Alcibiades, 1989. The inclusion of an important secondary source that I added was was reverted without any indication as to justification. It is difficult to envisage why my inclusion was removed. Could you shed any light on this? As Frank Northen Magill, Christina J. Moose, and Alison Aves clearly state in the Dictionary of World Biography, 1998, Benson's Life of Alcibiades is "The standard biography or Alcibiades ... written in large part from primary materials, especially Thucydides and Plutarch. ... Should appeal to scholars and students alike." Or Richard Louth in Andrew Traver, ed. states in From Polis to Empire—The Ancient World, c. 800 B.C.-A.D. 500: A Biographical Dictionary, 2002, Benson's Life of Alcibiades is a key biography on Alcibiades. Hellocheeky (talk) 22:28, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, you hit it on the head in your query to me. Your prose is flowery to the point of being promotional, you smack of being conflict of interest. Your edit summary said "Classic biography of Alcibiades by Benson." yet it was dated 2010 and was very careful to mention "Craig Paterson, Introduction", whoever that is. Terms like "highly engaging", "difficult to envisage" and so on set off long-term users' bells and whistles, your addition did and does. I will wikify it for you.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * In fact, checking your other edits, you have in three articles added this Craig Paterson. If that is you, you need to read WP:COI and Wikipedia's rules on self-promotion.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:42, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your edits. I am obliged. Having made a study of Benson and his writings and having read several newer releases of them, I thought I would share them. I I do not have the skills to embark on extensive efforts. I am glad my elementary mistakes were sorted by an experienced user. I'm not sure if this is the place to put this or not. Regards Hellocheeky (talk) 06:38, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not meant to chase you off, you are obviously knowledgeable on the subject, simply Wikipedia cannot be used for selfpromotion of any sort, and when it is, it is reverted by the first editor that catches it. I hope you continue to edit and that you enjoy your stay from here on out.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:31, 21 December 2010 (UTC)