User talk:Helloman124

Welcome!
Hello, Helloman124, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister  talk  01:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your edits to Australian Survivor articles
Hi, I've reverted a number of your edits across multiple articles related to Australian Survivor, in which you have retitled the second season of the program as Australian Celebrity Survivor: Vanuatu. This is not a commonly used title for the program, and in references to the program I could find, the common names are Australian Celebrity Survivor and Celebrity Survivor. If you can provide reliable citations that support your title claim, please add them to the articles and re-add your contributions.

Additionally, the article you created, List of Australian Survivor episodes, does not contain a single reliable reference and is as risk of being deleted. Please add reliable in-line citations to the article to support your claims. Thanks -- Whats new?(talk) 05:48, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Please avoid changing "Trump" to "Drumpf"
Hi Helloman124. In one of your recent edits, you changed the word "Trump" to "Drumpf". I assume that this was unintentional and caused by having the Drumpfinator extension enabled. To avoid this kind of mistake in the future, please disable the extension before editing articles that mention Trump. Thank you. —Granger (talk · contribs) 06:09, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Survivor (Australian TV Series) contestants with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   07:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! -- Whats new?(talk) 06:29, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Moving content
Please say in the edit summary were it was moved from. best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 11:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Celebrity Survivor
Regarding your constant edits of this manner across multiple articles about this subject, Celebrity Survivor is the shortform of Australian Celebrity Survivor, NOT Survivor: Vanuatu. Unless you can find a reliable official citation of the latter's common usage DON'T RE-ADD IT. I've raised this issue with you previously. If you wish to discuss it further or taking dispute resolution measures, please reply here or add a message to my talk page. Thanks -- Whats new?(talk) 06:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Date formatting
Hi, just to let you know I've reverted your edit to Australian Survivor (season 1), because you added commas to dates where not acceptable once again. Please see MOS:DATEFORMAT for examples of how to correctly format dates in articles. -- Whats new?(talk) 23:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Per your revert, please read MOS:BADDATE. It shows 3 July 2001 is acceptable whereas 3 July, 2001 is NOT acceptable, stating clearly "No comma between month and year". -- Whats new?(talk) 07:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

"American Survivor" vs. "American version of Survivor"
Hey! Couldn't fit my response to your edit summary in an edit summary, so here's the full thing: You've referred to the phrase "American Survivor" as "accepted short hand" for "the American edition of Survivor." According to WP:SLANG, "formal tone means that the article should not be written using argot, slang, colloquialisms, doublespeak, legalese, or jargon that is unintelligible to an average reader; it means that the English language should be used in a businesslike manner." If "American Survivor" is "short hand" (or slang) as you say (and I agree), then it would fall under what the quote from WP:SLANG says to avoid including. - Katanin (talk) 20:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Australian Survivor 3 Cast.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:Australian Survivor 3 Cast.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 23:22, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Australian Survivor 1 Cast.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Australian Survivor 1 Cast.jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Whats new?(talk) 07:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Australian Survivor (season 3), did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chase (talk) 22:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Ratings table
Hi, in regards to your twice reverting of my removal of the demos from the ratings table at Zumbo's Just Desserts, the reasons I have given you for removing them are the fact they are incomplete, and including the 18-49 demo is not standard in reporting on Austraian ratings (it is in America, but total people is the widely reported metric in Australia). Additionally, not all Australian television networks target the same demographics, which again is unlike American networks who do focus on the 18-49. For example, Network Ten has stated they have moved their focus from 16-39 to the 25-54 demo. Neither of those are the 18-49 range. If you wish to discuss further, please do reply and if necessary we can take formal measures to obtain a concensus. Saying the table exists on other pages is not wholly relevant, and frankly if I were to come across this on other pages I would likely remove them there is circumstances were similar. -- Whats new?(talk) 22:35, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I've reverted your edit for the same reasoning at Australian Survivor (season 3). Please engage in discussion on the article's talk page or here if you continue to disagree or have relevant points to raise. -- Whats new?(talk) 01:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Bare URLs
I think this, Bare URLs, would be a great read for you. Thank you. Chase (talk) 21:24, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. ''It would be greatly helpful to understand your intent on articles if you used the edit summary more often. It is unclear sometimes why you are adding something back or adding something in the first place. Thank you.'' Chase (talk) 21:28, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Explain your edits please
Multiple users have repeatedly asked you to explain reasons for your edits via edit summaries. Please use edit summaries EVERY time you make an edit. This incudes when you add content, delete content or change content. Give a brief reason in the edit summary box every time, to help other identify what changes were made, and to help you justify why the edits are better. Thank you. -- Whats new?(talk) 03:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm Whats new?. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Australian Survivor (season 3), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The information you added is likely correct, but it needs to be sourced. The existing references do not state or support what you claimed. Please do add the information back with a reference. -- Whats new?(talk) 08:59, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dianne Wiest. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Majora (talk) 00:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Aus Survivor 3 Cast.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Aus Survivor 3 Cast.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Aus Survivor 1 Cast.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Aus Survivor 1 Cast.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Whats new?(talk) 22:35, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Australian Celebrity Survivor Cast.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Australian Celebrity Survivor Cast.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Whats new?(talk) 07:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Final warning
In the following edit:, you reinstated material that was clearly denoted to have been removed as advertising and promotion. If you reinstate material, you take responsibility for it. You may neither write nor restore promotional content, as that is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Beyond that, I see several issues with copyright put forth here, and people asking you to explain why it is you're doing what you're doing. When other editors express concerns with your editing, it is required that you engage with them and discuss the matter, or, at very minimum, stop doing it. You may not ignore them and continue to plow ahead. If this behavior continues, or you continue going on ahead while still refusing to discuss, you will be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Friendly Reminder
Hello, I'm Hawkeye75. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

March 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Big Brother 15 (U.S.). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Davey2010, Helloman124 had a point. I saw you reverting all of the correct reverts. You don't need a source for a list. Hawkeye75   (talk)  02:46, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * - Editors/IPs are constantly changing names to fictitious ones on all BB articles, Do you actually know they're correct ?. Thanks. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep, search up "Big Brother 15" on Google and you can find the CBS page with the official cast. Hawkeye75   (talk)  03:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Well I have no idea who vandalised it then, Seeing as older american BB sites don't seem to have lists I assumed this was another,
 * Anyway Helloman124 infuture please use the edit summary or talkpage to explain reverts - It'd save us all time and patience. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Oshwah, you should unblock this user. Reverting vandalism is not "edit warring". This is an unacceptable block. - Hawkeye75  (talk)  03:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * With the greatest of respect he still edit warred, Yes I admit I didn't visit the talkpage however he was left with helpful edit summaries as well as the edit warring warning, He chose not to communicate and therefore blocking was the correct course of action. – Davey 2010 Talk 04:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * He technically didn't edit war under WP:EW though. - Hawkeye75  (talk)  04:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I disagree - He was edit warring and as I said failed to communicate with me or anyone, I'm sure once the 24hours is up he'll realise in future when ever an edit war occurs he must discuss it or atleast communicate in some way. – Davey 2010 Talk 04:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Big Brother (U.S. TV series), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:49, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother (U.S. TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:22, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Big Brother (U.S. TV series). If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''I agree that the information you keep adding to the article about the Battle Back needs to be added, however because it was not referred to as the Battle Back Competition it either needs to be added in a NEW OR SEPARATE section. Please do not add it in the same section again!!!'' TheDoctorWho (talk) 12:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother (U.S. TV series). ''I presented the information in a different section of the article. In the future you should do that as anything before BB18 was not a competition and did NOT belong in the COMPETITION section!!!!'' TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Love Island Australia
Thank you for your contributions to Love Island Australia. However, I have reverted your edits as they do not conform with the discussions held on the wiki's talk page Talk: Love Island Australia. Please refrain from reverting back to your edits. Looking through your talk page, it is very clear that you have made numerous unconstructive edits across multiple pages. I suggest you read wikipedia's List of policies specifically the Editing policies. Broadwaygenius (talk) 13:34, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Australian Survivor season 3 alternative logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Australian Survivor season 3 alternative logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Further edit summary reminder
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! -- Whats new?(talk) 06:24, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Australian Survivor: Champions vs. Contenders. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Use the talk page instead of constantly reverting. VietPride10 (talk) 15:13, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Australian Survivor: Champions vs. Contenders, you may be blocked from editing. ''Use the talk page, instead of making invalid justifications "looking messy" is not a valid justification. '' VietPride10 (talk) 14:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Australian Survivor: Champions vs. Contenders. ''Use the talk page, instead of constantly reverting. There are no valid justifications for reverting the agreed-upon content (as you are the only one disagreeing. )'' VietPride10 (talk) 01:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. VietPride10 (talk) 12:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Edits on Australian Survivor: Champions vs. Contenders
Could you please explain yourself why the contestant and season summary tables should not have the same finishes on them? To me they should be consistent with one another, as the tables are giving contradicting information under your reversions. For example your revision says that Zach is the 8th voted out on the castaway table, but on the season summary it says that he's 9th voted out. Thank you. --Sinjoh2015 (talk) 12:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Big Brother edits
I'm going to make a bold assumption that this and this is you because of this, this, this, and this. Just so you know restoring an edit that you believe is correct doesn't make it not edit warring just because you're logged out. Please refrain from restoring those edits again without first gaining consensus. The Doctor Who (talk) 06:14, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk: Big Brother 4 (U.S. season), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button Signature icon april 2018.png located above the edit window.

Thank you.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    14:11, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Survivor SA
Template:Survivor SA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:36, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Big Brother Canada (season 7) Voting history notes
Hello. I am going to revert your edits on Big Brother Canada (season 7). If you go back to BBCAN1, there were two double evictions and they had individual notes for each. Either change it on season 1 or revert your edit. As for the HoH casting a tie breaker vote, see BB19 (Notes 16 and 17) or BBCAN3 (Note 10). Thank you. Jayab314 01:32, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Big Brother
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Big Brother. Jayab314 23:46, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Your recent editing history at Big Brother 21 (American season) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Doctor Who (talk) 05:13, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. The Doctor Who (talk) 04:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Big Brother: Over the Top into Big Brother 21 (American season). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:52, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Brother 15 (American season), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blown Away ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Big_Brother_15_%28American_season%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Big_Brother_15_%28American_season%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Network 10, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DreamWorks ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Network_10 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Network_10?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Network Ten a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. - JuneGloom07 Talk  00:54, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khao Laem National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Survivor ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Khao_Laem_National_Park check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Khao_Laem_National_Park?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * You have been warned repeatedly about various types of disruptive editing. Your edit to Jimmy Wales was completely unacceptable. Please abandon this behavior when your block expires. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  07:01, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Big Brother Australia
Stop adding details that are not mentioned in your source (and you're just guessing based on the USA format) and removing valid information for seemingly no reason. These edits will be continually reverted and continuing to do so will lead to you being reported for unconstructive edits - which looking at your talk page you know full well could result in a ban from editing. - Riggleby (talk) 09:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Big Brother Australia 12
You need to Revert your edit. If you check the source you’ll see that User:TheImaCow added the CORRECT votes. Revert it.Taliarycroft (talk) 08:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Drunk History Australia


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Drunk History Australia, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Modussiccandi (talk) 13:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Drunk History Australia moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Drunk History Australia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nosebagbear (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Some1 (talk) 02:15, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Big Brother (American TV series) future season placements neutrality
I came to you this instant after I noticed some user had recently vandalized the article for Big Brother 12 (American season) and Big Brother 19 (American season). There is a comment stated that the putting the future BB placements (notably Big Brother 22 (American season)) are deemed vandalism. I have revert the edits. This move was because that sister CBS's shows like TAR and Survivor, which they do not state placements for future seasons (but other shows are allowed however) due to neutrality. I need to do your part to help me monitor those possible edits, and do your part undo the edits if come arise.

I have provided the synopsis for those competitions in return, though, I managed to get it from a blogger website called Bobbymgsk, in case you are wondering.

Thanks. TVSGuy (talk) 14:50, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

The Amazing Race "&amp;nbsp;" Info
Hi Helloman124. Just to let you know,  stands for a non-breaking space and helps prevent line wraps from occurring. This allows the times in this edit to appear correctly, as opposed to separate lines. For more information, see preventing word gaps.

Thanks, Happily888 (talk) 06:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Inappropriate flag use
Please don't add flags for no good reason as you did here. Those flags were removed for a reason: see MOS:WORDPRECEDENCE and MOS:FLAGCRUFT. In most reality TV shows, the people are not actually representing their nation in an official capacity. The places they visit are usually not welcoming them as a state visit. So there is no good reason for the flags. Binksternet (talk) 01:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Survivor South Africa. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 13:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

The Bridge (Australian TV series) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Bridge (Australian TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
 * This article cannot go to mainspace until production has commenced.
 * References supplied announce the new program. There is no reference to commencement of production of this television series.
 * You can move this article back to mainspace when references about production are available. Whiteguru (talk) 10:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Bridge (Australian TV series)
Hello, Helloman124. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bridge (Australian TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Bridge (Australian TV series)


Hello, Helloman124. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Bridge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)