User talk:Hellooskitty

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Xmanager, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Xmanager was changed by Hellooskitty (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-01-31T02:13:58+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:14, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Xlpd
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Xlpd, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.netsarang.com/products/xlp_detail.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Xlpd
A tag has been placed on Xlpd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Peasantwarrior (talk) 18:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Peasantwarrior (talk) 18:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of XManager
An article that you have been involved in editing, XManager, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/XManager. Thank you. A new name 2008 (talk) 19:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you
The article you created: XManager  may be deleted from Wikipedia. There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here: Articles for deletion/XManager . The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted Findsources3:
 * Find sources for XManager : google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:
 * 1. If your page is encyclopedic, list the page on Article Rescue Squadron by adding:
 * below:
 * on the XManager page.
 * You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
 * 2. At any time, you can ask any administrator to move your article to a special page. (Called userfication)


 * 3. You can request a mentor to help you: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
 * 4. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. These acronyms don't need to intimidate you. Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: Deletion debate acronyms, which will help you argue that the article should be kept.

If your page is deleted, you also have many options available. Good luck! Ikip (talk) 21:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

XManager
Hello. You keep removing the Notability and Unreferenced maintenance templates from. These templates are there to identify the problems with the article so other editors can help fix the article. In the future when removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. A new name 2008 (talk) 13:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Xmanager
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Xmanager, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.softsea.com/review/Xmanager.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)