User talk:Heloasis

Deletion discussion about Princess Cassandra Windsor
Hello, Heloasis,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Princess Cassandra Windsor should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Princess Cassandra Windsor.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, JamesG5 (talk) 09:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Princess Cassandra Windsor
Hi, I'm JamesG5. Heloasis, thanks for creating Princess Cassandra Windsor!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. See notes on talk page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. JamesG5 (talk) 09:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Princess Cassandra Windsor


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Princess Cassandra Windsor, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JohnCD (talk) 14:16, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Unsourced content
Hi. I saw that you added some biographical details to Orlando Bloom and Lucas Till. The problem is that it wasn't sourced. Wikipedia requires content to be verifiable, and has especially strict policies on biographies of living people. To prevent false information from spreading and affecting people's lives, we require editors to cite their sources when adding biographical details. Keep in mind that the IMDb is not a reliable source, nor are more self-published fan sites and blogs. Good sources to use would be magazines and newspapers. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Hugh Jackman. Thank you.  4TheWynne (talk) (contribs)  22:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George V. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ttwaring (talk) 20:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating hoaxes. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 21:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)