User talk:Helpkb

October 2009
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. noq (talk) 12:57, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FAR HTML


The article FAR HTML has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Cannot find any indication that this software meets notability guidelines. Need reliable sources to verify notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 19:00, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

What we are not
We are not a wp:forum, nor are article talk pages for criticise Wikipedia (if you think things need to change wp:villagepump is one venue). I also think wp:npa might be worth a read, as article talk pages are also not for slagging off other editors or their motives.Slatersteven (talk) 13:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Replying in the main thread Helpkb (talk) 02:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * We do not discus user conduct on article talk pages. And much of your two comments can be seen as violating NPA, as well as wp:soap.Slatersteven (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Standard alert
-Slatersteven (talk) 10:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC)