User talk:Helwr

Welcome
Note: Please be careful with adding links to articles, read WP:EL, WP:SPAM. Sole Soul (talk) 23:08, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Data mining has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/ (matching the regex rule \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Data mining spam
It seems that you are a data mining zealot. It would be best to restrict you link additions to pages with a real connection. Dicklyon (talk) 06:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Please note that, per WP:ALSO, the "See also" section of articles should be restricted to "A reasonable number of relevant links", and per WP:NOT, Wikipedia articles are not intended to be complete directories to all related possible articles on a particular subject. If that's what you want to create, you may want to review WP:PORTAL for tips on creating a page for PORTAL:Data mining. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:29, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to International reactions to the Gaza flotilla raid appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.Lihaas (talk) 06:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Let me give you a link that might help.
I saw your struggles today with edits on Project Orion (nuclear propulsion)‎ and I feel your pain having been there and done that. Let me give you a link to a page that might help you beat those pesky references into shape. It is Citation templates and I have cut and pasted a number of these to my sandbox when I have needed them for references like the one you've been working on. Trilobitealive (talk) 16:18, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Sparse Coding
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sparse Coding, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://deeplearning.stanford.edu/wiki/index.php/Sparse_Coding.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sparse Coding


A tag has been placed on Sparse Coding requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://deeplearning.stanford.edu/wiki/index.php/Sparse_Coding. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  05:11, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Sparse Coding, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  05:35, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

DS Alert

 * --Jorm (talk) 04:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

invitation
Thank you for your recent contributions to. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining ? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 17:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm BriefEdits. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Alison Collins seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BriefEdits (talk) 18:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert - BLP
Firefangledfeathers (talk) 04:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Your edit to Semantic similarity has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information.   ev iolite   (talk)  01:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

June 2022
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Josh Shapiro. Thank you. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 08:44, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Josh Shapiro, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   16:56, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Don't disrupt Wikipedia to make a point, and stop demanding false symmetry. Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia, and political stances seen by Americans through a local partisan lens afe not in keeping with a broader perspective.  Acroterion   (talk)   16:58, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Doug Mastriano shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 14:55, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Helwr. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:47, 25 June 2022 (UTC)