User talk:HemaChandra88

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 15:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Murty Classical Library of India, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Murty Classical Library of India without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * My apologies for this revert. I only intended to revert the last edit, but there were three edits in a row, which I didn't notice. In any case, the problem now is much wider than that revert. I think you need to start discussing on the talk pages what issues you are addressing instead of making more edits. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 19:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * More unexplained modifications of sources and sourced content, e.g., . You need to stop this. Or, you will get into trouble. - Kautilya3 (talk) 19:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 19:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Battle for Sanskrit. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

Please follow WP:BRD and discuss the issues on the talk page when edits are reverted. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2016 petition to remove Sheldon Pollock from Murty Classical Library. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:25, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * @ done.
 * Yeah, I noticed. But your source wasn't an WP:RS. It is also odd that you should mention the UC, Irvine Chair, while ignoring the Columbia Chair. Presumably it is easier to establish connections with the latter (again using reliable sources). - Kautilya3 (talk) 12:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Why is it not WP:RS? Swarajya is a well known reputed journal. BTW, what about Columbia Chair? Are you talking about Sringeri peetham Chair?HemaChandra88 (talk) 13:14, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Email me for an academic paper
Email me for an academic paperVictoriaGraysonTalk 18:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * @ Hi, Sorry. I didn't get you. Which paper? Email where? HemaChandra88 (talk) 08:26, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * See HERE.VictoriaGraysonTalk 16:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

naveenpf (talk) 07:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Koenraad Elst.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Koenraad Elst.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:François Gautier.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:François Gautier.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:34, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Michel Danino.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Michel Danino.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited François Gautier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from File:Michel Danino.jpg. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Non-free images of living people
Hi,

You've recently uploaded non-free images of living people which have been tagged for deletion. You should be aware that the fact that you are unable to find a free image of the subject does not mean a non-free image is allowable. Per Non-free content, "Non-free content should not be used when a freely licensed file that serves the same purpose can reasonably be expected to be uploaded, as is the case for almost all portraits of living people." In particular such images are in violation of non-free content criteria point 1. As a living person, it is reasonable to expect that somebody would be able to create a free image of the subject. For example, for authors, somebody might take a picture at a book signing. Generally speaking, non-free images of living people are almost always in violation of point 1 and will be deleted. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 17:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Sheldon Pollock
Hi HemaChandra88. We disagree (partly) on Sheldon Pollock, but your edits are good. I like that. Best,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   08:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

thanks. Much appreciated. HemaChandra88 (talk) 09:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Sheldon Pollock. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Buddhism
This edit was badly informed, and misplaced. How come you po-up at this topic? Are you following my edits? Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   04:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hemachandra88, tell Joshua Jonathan to stay off your talk page. If you tell someone to stay off your talk page, then it's a rule they cannot break.VictoriaGraysonTalk 07:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * That's a really disappointing "advice," Vic. Not the kind of collaborative effort you'd expect from an experienced editor.  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   08:39, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello HemaChandra88, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Mother's Agenda has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 18:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Ambalavasi
I have removed your "one source" tag. There are two well-respected academic sources at that article, so I have no idea why you would tag it. The tag itself suggests that you're supposed to explain at the talk page but you seem not to have done. A quick search of Google Books suggests that there are tens of potential sources, if not more, so surely it would be better to try incorporating some of those rather than drive-by tagging? - Sitush (talk) 09:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Important Notice
—  Newslinger  talk   21:11, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

India that is Bharat moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, India that is Bharat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sonofstar (talk) 09:30, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited General Mediterranean Holding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: India that is Bharat has been accepted
 India that is Bharat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=India_that_is_Bharat help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! S0091 (talk) 16:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of India that is Bharat (book) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article India that is Bharat (book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/India that is Bharat (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tayi Arajakate Talk 16:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring on Angana Chatterji
Hello. Would you be able to intervene in an ongoing dispute concerning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angana_P._Chatterji ? I messaged a user who had made a mechanical edit on the page, but the user said that she was unfamiliar with the process and could not intervene. The dispute is summarised on the talk page of the user I wrote to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ira_Leviton#Angana_Chatterji Thanks   Tatsuro22 (talk) 18:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of India that is Bharat (book) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article India that is Bharat (book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/India that is Bharat (book)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. TrangaBellam (talk) 06:57, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)