User talk:Hemalpatel1483

Welcome
Hello, Hemalpatel1483 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text:  on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished!  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Hemalpatel1483, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Your edit to Inorganic chemistry has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Plagiarism and inorganic chemistry edits
Hi @Hemalpatel1483, I noticed you've moved your work to the mainspace, and it's been deleted multiple times for copyright violation by volunteers. Before I provide my feedback, please stop moving the same draft work or sandbox work on to the mainspace, after it's been removed. It's considered edit warring and could result in your account being blocked. It doesn't look like you are up to date on the training modules and exercises on the Dashboard, so actually completing the exercises would help you a lot.

Plagiarism: Your work was first removed bc it was copied from [Https://themasterchemistry.com/inorganic-chemistry-history-scope-and-applications/ https://themasterchemistry.com/inorganic-chemistry-history-scope-and-applications/]. This was detected by automatic plagiarism detection software. For copyright reasons, this contribution had to be deleted. Remember that additions to Wikipedia need to be written entirely in your own words. Please review the Plagiarism and Copyright training module before making additional edits. Continuing to plagiarize could result in your account being blocked.

When it comes to the actual content, remember, the goal is to provide a neutral, fact based summary, in your own words, of the reliable sources you found, not to persuade the readers. Wikipedia isn’t a place to share original ideas or opinions. Don’t offer your own conclusions, interpretations, or analyses. I recommend reading over pgs. 7-9 of Editing Wikipedia before you rewrite to check out some examples of what is appropriate writing style for Wikipedia.

Your article has very few inline citations, which makes it difficult for readers to verify factual statements in your article. Every statement should be followed by a supporting citation; if a group of sentences are all supported by the same source, you can place a single reference after all of them, but you need to have at least one reference per paragraph, and you shouldn't have any statements after the final reference in a paragraph. If you need a refresher on how to add citations, please consult this training module.

My recommendation is to go through the trainings you haven't completed, read over the Editing Wikipedia pdf, and work on your contribution in your sandbox. Do not move your work to mainspace until someone - myself or your instructor @Ultush has reviewed your work. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes Now I got this but I have also read some more information about the history of inorganic and wrote it again what's happened with that article I took information from 5 varies books and at the last paragraph I also added references of that all books.  Hemalpatel1483 (talk) 23:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, I also wanted to know that how many words I have to add for Editing a Wikipedia article. I am little bit confuse about that. Please Explain me about this. I am quite new with this assignment because I have never done this before so Please help me this. Hemalpatel1483 (talk) 23:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not Brianda or associated with WikiEd, however the answer is none. The constructiveness of edits is not based on how many words there are but the actual content of the edit. COpying exactly what a source says is a WP:COPYVIO which I warned you for above. If you had continued multiple times then you probably would've been blocked as we take copyvios very seriously. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:37, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * The project is not about word count, but about the quality of the edits you are contributing and completing the training modules and exercises(actually completing the exercises). I see you don't have a sandbox or a bibliography page, so I know that you didn't complete those exercises. Please read the above feedback and go through my recommendations, and once you have something in a sandbox to be reviewed, you can reach out. Also when a volunteer reverts an edit, or leaves a message on your talk page, feel free to engage with them to see where you can improve. @Blaze Wolf is on the dot about plagiarism and the constructiveness of edits. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)