User talk:Hemmeband17

Please do not add material without providing sources, as you did with your edit of Eve Torres adding wrestling manoveures she supposedly regularly uses. Thank you. ' !! Just a Punk !! ' 06:47, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Youtube
Please do not add links which include YouTube videos which are copyright violations. Use to source information using a TV program. Thanks. Black Kite (t) (c) 16:10, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Section headers
Please stop making section headers so ridiculously long. There's no need to squeeze every single little detail in these headers (feud with X, alliance with Y, etc.) It's a waste of space and looks horrible. That's what the content within the section is for. Thanks. --Jtalledo (talk) 12:54, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Look who ever you are! I have been editing all these diva pages for months now and i havent had ANY complaints. I have made the ratings of those pages go up, and ALL of them are high ratings! Also, if you are the one editing the Divas of Doom page and The Chickbusters, I suggest you stop because i created those pages and if you keep touching and editing them, and going to file for vandalism. I have done nothing wrong EXCEPT make all the pages ive edited better. You, as one in a billion of people is the ONLY one who has a problem with what Im doing! So, there is no problem with just summarizing what is in the sections! Until you start editing for as long as I have, AND made the pages as GREAT as I did, try doing something people want and stop coming at me with crap for at least making the pages better!
 * It's not making pages better by dumping every last detail in these section headers. It's not necessary at all and looks messy. Per WP:SECTION, titles of section headings should also conform to standards on article titles. So the point about article titles being "sufficiently precise, concise" applies. I'm sorry if you take personal offense to this, but if you read the blurb on the edit screen, it reads "If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here." In other words, you should expect that someone wants to edit what you do, even if they don't agree with what you're doing. --Jtalledo (talk) 15:40, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd also advise you to review WikiProject Professional wrestling/Style guide, which states that section headers should be five words or less, not including dates. --Jtalledo (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

I dont mind when someone wants to edit it ALSO, but what I do mind is the deleting of resources and facts that I wrote down for example, on Kaitlyn's page, some of the matches that I wrote on there were deleted along with the resources. Im just saying that I put hours into trying to make these pages good, but I dont appreciate it being deleted because it is like I wrote it, and searched for those resources for nothing.
 * Hi. I'm sorry I deleted those, but per WP:PW/MOS, wrestlers biographies shouldn't have a synopsis of week by week events, since Wikipedia is not an up-to-date news site, but rather a general use encyclopedia. The Pro Wrestling wiki on Wikia is a far better place for such things. It's nothing personal and I appreciate the effort, but these are just the guidelines. If you've any further issues or questions, feel free to contact me. And again, I apologize if you take any personal offense. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Okay, that's fine. And I'm sorry for biting your head off, lol.

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. When you recently edited Kaitlyn (wrestler), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NXT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Maxine (wrestler) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Hunter


 * Michael Hutter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Intervention

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Audrey marie
Thanks for you edits on Audrey marries article --Nakurio (talk) 14:44, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Your welcome, no problem! -Hemmeband17

Kaitlyn (wrestler) et al
She was the winner of NXT season three, as her WWE bio states, not "WWE Breakout diva." And please don't delete the week-by-week note. And seriously, please consider taking the five seconds and providing an edit summary with all your edits. People aren't psychic and can't be expected to assume they know your rationale for an edit. And regarding the Chickbusters, there's no need for subsections since that section is already small and nothing wrong with trimming the section either. --Jtalledo (talk) 11:10, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay. Finally some rationale. The article can have both NXT titles at the same time then and the Chickbusters article can remain as you edited it. Thanks for that. --Jtalledo (talk) 11:19, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Photos
There should be a link called "Upload file" under "Toolbox" on the left hand side of the page. Use the upload form and following the instructions to upload a file, making sure to observe copyright, etc. After that's done, on the page itself, you can click the little picture icon next to the italics "I" and type the name of the file you have just uploaded. The "left" and "right" parameters allow for alignment and a caption can also be added. See the syntax of pictures currently on pages for more info. Also see WP:IUP for the image use policy and WP:CMF for detailed how to information. --Jtalledo (talk) 11:44, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * OK. I'll try to find one. Jtalledo (talk) 22:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Karlee Perez.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Karlee Perez.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nici Vampire  Heart  12:54, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Derrick Bateman and Kaitlyn.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Derrick Bateman and Kaitlyn.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:06, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Multiple WP violations on Kaitlyn (wrestler)
The changes you were making to Kaitlyn (wrestler) have been reverted due to violating several Wikipedia polices. Please review the following before making any more changes: WP:3RR, WP:OR, WP:NOT, WP:BLP, WP:MOS --208.38.59.161 (talk) 18:47, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Just tell me, what did I violate? I have been doing the same thing for months, and I wasn't told that I was doing violations. So what did I violate??
 * AGAIN you reverted, you're supposed to cease warring, not continue it- that was your 4th edit in 24 hrs, which usually results in a 24 hr ban. Just some of your violations: Your personal info is poorly sourced, a violation of BLP. There is no WWE title of "Breakout Diva", her WWE bio doesn't even include the word "breakout". The term "breakout diva" was a nickname for the winner of NXT season 3, she could sparingly be referred to as a "breakout diva" but never a "Breakout Diva" and not at all in her WWE listed championships/accomplishments. Using it as a title is original research, which is against the rules. WP is NOT a news site, you not only re-added the weekly events but again removed the hidden text that was telling you NOT to do that. --208.38.59.161 (talk) 19:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I apologize. You can take it off, but everytime you do, you take off a resourced move and resourced nicknames. So when you edit it, can you just go to it and delete it. Thank you. I would do it but like you said, I cant edit it

Hold on, why did you delete my sourced moves?

May 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ridernyc (talk) 00:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Repost of American Perfection (professional wrestling)
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Papacha (talk) 02:28, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Athleek  123  04:09, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221(talk&#124;contrib) 17:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chickbusters and Natalya.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chickbusters and Natalya.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:04, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:The Chickbusters.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Chickbusters.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:08, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kaitlyn Lotus lock.png
Thanks for uploading File:Kaitlyn Lotus lock.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status, as you did with File:Kaitlyn Lotus lock.png. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. ''There is no statement of permission on the source you have been citing in your uploads. Please stop making false claims.'' Eeekster (talk) 21:10, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kaitlyn FCW 2011.png
Thanks for uploading File:Kaitlyn FCW 2011.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:10, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:KaitMan in 2012.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KaitMan in 2012.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:11, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kaitlyn Lotus lock 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kaitlyn Lotus lock 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:11, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kaitlyn Sidewalk slam.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kaitlyn Sidewalk slam.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 08:11, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Pin-Up-Strong.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pin-Up-Strong.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 07:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:The Divas of Doom.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Divas of Doom.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 08:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.38.59.161 (talk) 15:53, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Kaitlyn (wrestler). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. - 2/0 (cont.) 18:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Kaitlyn (wrestler)
A Wikipedia admin has agreed your edits are "decidedly not policy compliant". Continued reverts will just result in you getting banned again so just stop it. If you have serious issue about your edits DO NOT REVERT and discuss them on the article's talk page. --TheTruthiness (talk) 05:43, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Tyson Kidd
While I appreciate your post on my talk page claiming to understand my point about unreliable sources like wrestlingattitude... I still do not understand why you blatantly reverted my edit regarding Tyson Kidd (without bothering to provide an edit summary when I bothered to) and instantly added back a wrestlingattitude source. Starship.paint (talk) 09:51, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * And I see you're still adding material from WrestlingAttitude onto pages such as Kaitlyn and Natayla. Starship.paint (talk) 09:55, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 Days for For edit waring on Kaitlyn (wrestler), by repeating edits that previously got you blocked for 24 hours. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Jeepday (talk) 10:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alicia Fox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kaitlyn (wrestler), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Booker T and No Holds Barred (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alicia Fox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:34, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

The Encore
Please stop reverting to the prior revision, especially without an edit summary explaining why. It contains several errors. Info about an individual member of a stable belongs in that individual's article. We've stopped defining wrestlers as on either brand, since everyone's everywhere. There's no source for "The Band" name. A group of three or more wrestlers is a stable, not a tag team. The sources in the article agree. The prose is poorly written by English standards. I notice you've recently been blocked for edit warring. I'm sure you'd rather avoid that happening again. Thanks. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:42, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of International Airstrike


The article International Airstrike has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * There is no original source (i.e., WWE.com) that calls them International Airstrike.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BarryTheUnicorn (talk) 13:35, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Perfection, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aksana, John Hennigan and United States Championship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Talk:American Perfection
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:American Perfection, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

Disambiguation link notification for October 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Tyson Kidd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Bruce Hart, Darren Young, Unified Tag Team Championship and Neil Griffiths

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of American Perfection


A tag has been placed on American Perfection, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:20, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of 3MB for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 3MB is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/3MB until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Dch eagle  | Join the Fight! 01:22, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Hybridkaitlyn.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Hybridkaitlyn.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 03:46, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent bad image uploads. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:17, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of International Airstrike for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Airstrike is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/International Airstrike until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Feed back  ☎ 02:04, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kaitlyn (wrestler), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Booker T and No Holds Barred (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Perfection (professional wrestling) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Perfection (professional wrestling), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:08, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eve Torres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Instructor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Chickbusters (professional wrestling)


A tag has been placed on The Chickbusters (professional wrestling), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  STATic  message me!  15:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tyson Kidd and Justin Gabriel concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tyson Kidd and Justin Gabriel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

re
We discussed Kaitlyn's intro extensively on WP:PW and we ultimately decided to remove any mention of The Chickbusters from AJ, Kaitlyn, and Natalya's intro because everyone pretty much agreed it was not notable. I removed everything you put back there because we've been through this issue before. There was a previous edit war over this exact same issue. Her feud with Vickie, being the only female to win NXT (well duh, she was in the only female season), and being called "The Hybrid Diva" really aren't intro worthy. They're certainly encyclopedic and should be mentioned in the body of the article, just not in the intro, which needs to summarize. If you do add a quick mention about The Chickbusters in Kaitlyn's intro I don't revert you, although I cannot guarantee that others won't. However I will challenge your edits if you revert my edits and bring it back to that cluttered mess that mentions her being the only female NXT winner. How's about that?LM2000 (talk) 10:04, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm going to revert you if you don't do a self revert on that edit you just made. Again, I won't bother you if you just mention The Chickbusters, but you're cluttering the intro with other non-notable drivel.  Are you by any chance the IP who edit warred with us last time around?LM2000 (talk) 10:08, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * It's not about the edits. I've already said that you are free to add the bit about The Chickbusters back and I won't revert you.  I'm also down for a discussion to get a consensus going (separate from the one on WP:PW which spawned my edits, and the edits of others the IP reverted, in the first place).  The sockpuppet issue is something entirely separate as far as I'm concerned.  If you are not involved with Hauntingwhisper or IP then I apologize, but there's enough evidence besides reverting me to at least raise some questions.  If I was opening this investigation for some sort of revenge, and you turned out to be total innocent, then that would be silly on my part as the WP:BOOMERANG would come right back at me.LM2000 (talk) 11:25, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=577111560 your edit] to Kaitlyn (wrestler) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:05, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ]. Bonin is best friends with fellow WWE Diva April Jeanette Mendez (AJ Lee). In May 2012, Bonin was asked a series of questions by the webmaster of

Sockpuppet Investigation Notice
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Hemmeband17. Thank you. LM2000 (talk) 10:50, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I've blocked you for one week for inappropriately using multiple accounts per the findings of the SPI. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

End your disruptive edits
You probably think that I'm happy to see you banned, but I'm not. This is not about WINNING. I was fully intent on having that discussion with you, but you have lied to me at every turn. You have accused me of not taking acceptance of people's edits... For the three months or so that I have been frequenting Kaitlyn (wrestler) you have reverted every edit that I made, all of the edits that Kharmafan made, several edits that Prefall made, and some that Starship.Paint made. Who knows how long you have been doing this, I've only caught the last three months. You do not WP:OWN these articles on wikipedia. I was gracious enough to let you keep that bit about The Chickbusters in the intro because I believed the majority was against me, you refused to discuss and refused to compromise and reverted everything I put in there anyway until I put you under investigation. Because I agreed to The Chickbuster edits under false pretenses I have reverted the intro back to the addition that me and Starship agreed on, because we have the majority consensus since the three of you turned out to be one person. I will revert you if you choose to fight over this and add mentions of The Chickbusters again. If you continue making disruptive edits to the intro (or elsewhere) after you return then I will bring you to WP:ANI, where you were earlier this week for not accepting HHH Pedigree's edits on Eva Marie. When you come back this time next week I hope that you have a complete change in character and show a willingness to accept people's edits and that you make an effort to work well with others.

By the way, a quick google search for results from 2010-2012 shows multiple instances of Kaitlyn doing the spear. Her in-kayfabe interview will not be enough for your claims that she started doing it this year.LM2000 (talk) 22:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I provided a source of when she used it in 2010, but I removed the 2010-present since it isn't really necessarily to list the date anyway.LM2000 (talk) 22:56, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission American Perfection (professional wrestling)


Hello Hemmeband17. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled American Perfection (professional wrestling).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 23:04, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tyson Kidd and Justin Gabriel


Hello Hemmeband17. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Tyson Kidd and Justin Gabriel".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 레비 Revi Discuss SUL Info 04:32, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

"Nipple H" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nipple H. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. LM2000 (talk) 04:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)