User talk:Henchren

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kyle Bobby Dunn has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kyle-Bobby-Dunn/44266029492?ref=search&sid=780059967.801998899..1 (matching the regex rule \bfacebook\.com). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:49, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Kyle Bobby Dunn
I have nominated Kyle Bobby Dunn, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Kyle Bobby Dunn. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. &mdash; RHaworth 16:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Regarding Kyle Bobby Dunn, do you have any secondary sources? As in, newspaper or magazine articles specifically about him, or a reputable website specifically about him? Anyone can make a Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, etc., so just having one of those isn't enough for notability. The Pitchfork reference is a good start; have you seen any other secondary reviews of his work in newspapers, magazines, etc.? I found only one trivial mention in Google News. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:10, 23 October 2009 (UTC) *I found more listed on the Brainwashed review page. There are also websites and reliable press releases on the record label websites.

Kyle Bobby Dunn
Please don't vote more than once in AFD discussions. We go by consensus, not vote-counting, so saying "keep keep keep keep keep keep keep" won't help. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:19, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kyle Bobby Dunn
A tag has been placed on Kyle Bobby Dunn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. GrooveDog &bull; i'm groovy. 02:33, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Kyle Bobby Dunn
Hi there.

I closed the Kyle Bobby Dunn deletion discussion as "delete" because the discussion participants agreed that Dunn was not notable. In accordance with speedy deletion criterion G4, the Dunn article that you just recreated ought to have been deleted, because it was a recreation of an article deleted per discussion consensus. I have userfied the article for your sake, and it's now located here: User:Henchren/Kyle Bobby Dunn. I simply closed the AfD as "delete" because of an agreement among the "AfD" participants. If you disagree with my closure of the discussion, you can file the case at Deletion Review. Please note that other editors will likely not support an overturn of the decision unless you provide more sources proving notability.

I suggest that you not recreate the article in the main article space again, or else it will be subject to speedy deletion. Good luck, Jamie  S93  21:18, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I have added reliable sources and linked it to categories on Wikipedia. What else can I add to publish this article?

Possibly unfree File:YPGKBD.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:YPGKBD.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:38, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lasted-Pioulard.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lasted-Pioulard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Krank123.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Krank123.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Kyle Bobby Dunn shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. — WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:00, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)