User talk:Hendricksen

The DWI content in the Ralph Barbieri biogrphy is verifiable content. Please stop deleting it. It's meant as a statement of fact, not slander. If you think it's slander, then consider suing the San Francisco Chronicle, where the information was printed in the first place. The online version of the content is here: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/1995/06/16/SP34438.DTL&hw=barbieri&sn=001&sc=1000. If you continue to delete this content, I'll consider it vandalism and do what I can do suspend your ability to post.

The truth of this matter is this: Sometimes people in the public eye make mistakes. Ralph Barbieri made a mistake (three of them, as a matter of fact), and those mistakes are documented. I'm sure that Mr. Barbieri would be the first to admit the error of his ways, but they're still part of his history, and as such, need to be documented.

Do you edit OJ Simpson's biography to exclude the fact that he was arrested, tried and found innocent of murdering two people? These are facts. You can't overlook them, no matter how much you may like OJ Simpson. You cannot pretend that he wasn't arrested and stood trial. You're revising and obscuring history if you do.

Your additions are fair enough, and well-taken. Ralph is a portrait of redemption. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.107.110.218 (talk) 03:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ralph Barbieri
An editor has nominated Ralph Barbieri, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)