User talk:Hengre

AfD nomination of Cartilagebaroque
I have nominated Cartilagebaroque, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Cartilagebaroque. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. JD554 (talk) 13:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Stavangerrenaissance
An article that you have been involved in editing, Stavangerrenaissance, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 13:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. JD554 (talk) 13:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Compound words in English
In English it is not so usual as in Norwegian to make a compound word by putting two words together: so an English-speaker looking at "Stavangerrenaissance" does not easily see how the word splits into two, and it looks to him like a meaningless jumble. I think that is why your two articles got tagged as possible hoaxes. I have taken off the "hoax" tags, and within the articles I have separated the words to "Stavanger renaissance" and "Cartilage baroque". If the articles are kept, we should do that to the titles, too, but I don't think that is possible while they are listed at AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, thank you! :D Hengre 13:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

The article Kong Alreks Orkester has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Inge Valen


The article Inge Valen has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. - Happysailor  (Talk) 22:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)