User talk:Henri de Solages

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Lectonar Parlez-moi
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hi
Interested in machine translation for lesser-used languages? We should talk. - Francis Tyers · 15:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

In answer to your question:

It would be useful to say if there is a free MT project somewhere, and what could be the cost of building such a system for one pair of languages (for instance in term of the capital of a company doing the job). My underlying question is: "Is it reasonable to expect/promote a MT for rare languages, and if yes under which economic model (community, proprietary)? " (I live in Mongolia.)--Henri de Solages 12:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm working with a group that focusses on machine translation for lesser-used languages (see Apertium). Depending on the closeness of the language pair, the cost in terms of man-years is from 1 and up. For example, Spanish-Catalan, Spanish-Portuguese may be written from scratch by one person in a year. Anything more could take more time. Of course, more than one person can work on it at any one time, and it is not necessary to work full-time (for example in a volunteer context).


 * In terms of economic model, the only one I support is free software / open source (which would correspond to your "community" I think). We actively try to promote lesser-used languages (for example Occitan and Aranese), and would welcome collaborators. If you have any more questions, we can discuss things by email. You can email me using the email user feature. - Francis Tyers · 15:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Deuterocanonical Books
hello!

I noted your correction on the 1 Maccabees page.

It appears that you confuse two matters, when you write: "These Protestants call such religious books "deuterocanonical" or "Apocrypha"."

While it is true that many Protestants use the term "Apocrypha" – which is rather confusing, but that's not the point – the term "deuterocanical" is a Catholic name for the OT books that are not contained in the Hebrew Bible, and whose canonicity is rejected by most Protestants but accepted by the Catholic Church and most Orthodox churches.

You'll find a correct presentation in the page you referred to.

Cordially, Dampinograaf (talk) 21:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)