User talk:Henry2lokkh

The Tunnel broadcast in Hong Kong
From Manual of Style/Television > WP:TVINTL:

Information (if noteworthy) about broadcasts in other countries that are not the countries of production is included in the  ===Broadcast===  sub-section of  ==Release==  section. Pyxis Solitary 13:34, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your article on Asia Television Digital Media Limited
I came upon the article of Asia Television Digital Media Limited and I am a bit confused. The article of Asia Television has clearly shown their new online television plans and updates. Even the lead paragraph "Asia Television is an online media company based in Hong Kong. Established as the first television service in Hong Kong..." It has shown that ATV has transformed into an online TV company. The article seems redundant as it just shows the background which was already included in the main article, other info such as management team and charge price of the set TV box is something we don't really include in Wikipedia. Would you consider merging it to Asia Television? Cheers. –Wefk423 (talk) 15:34, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Here to give you an update. Per discussion in Talk:Asia Television, I have merged your article into Asia Television. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's rules and guidelines, and if you are a paid editor with a conflict of interest, please do follow the steps below. Cheers. –Wefk423 (talk) 11:59, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Are you a paid editor with a conflict of interest?
Hello Henry2lokkh. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Henry2lokkh. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwmhiraeth (talk • contribs) 10:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm Nardog. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Vowel have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Nardog (talk) 11:26, 8 February 2019 (UTC)