User talk:Henry9967

Proposed deletion of Borg Energy


The article Borg Energy has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable corporation. All citations given fail to verify the information cited, and appear to be stories based on a single press release issued by BORG (note similarity of wording in all cited news stories).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:47, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Borg Energy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Borg Energy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Borg Energy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:14, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I have posted my reply there.Henry9967 (talk) 17:38, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Guideline
Remember you can vote only once, when you write in bold letters.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 05:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I am sorry for the mistake. Thank you sir for the note. I have changed the keep vote to comment. Henry9967 (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Good, anyways there is no need to comment about that article anymore. Because I really don't see any fair points from those who wants the article to be deleted. If there is one, I could comment. I got it on watchlist.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 05:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for the suggestion. I have removed my comment from the page. I really appreciate your kind help. Regards, Henry9967 (talk) 05:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BORG-logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:BORG-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)