User talk:HenryPlayz84

November 2020
Hello, I'm TornadoLGS. I noticed that you recently removed content from Enhanced Fujita scale without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''The information you removed is backed up by a reliable source, namely a publication of the National Weather Service, so it should stay unless there is a compelling reason to remove it. If you think such a reason exists, you may present it on the article's talk page. However, as a caution, if you do want to continue discussing this matter, you should do so in a civil manner; continued use of profanity may lead you your account being blocked from editing. Thank you.'' TornadoLGS (talk) 21:53, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Enhanced Fujita scale. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 01:10, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Enhanced Fujita scale shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.'' I strongly suggest you discuss this on Talk:Enhanced Fujita scale. You haven't violated the three-revert rule yet but it's very likely to escalate to administrator attention should you decide to continue.'' — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 )  04:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 11:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)