User talk:HenryTemplo

December 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Hey Duggee—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:55, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

I don’t want to start an edit war, but I was trying to make the section more concise, as it contains unnecessary information, while leaving out some crucial info, and many of the descriptions are poorly written, with poor grammar and spellings, so I attempted a rewrite, making it clearer. However I was quite bold with my edit. If you disagree with my edit, feel free to bring it up on the hey Duggee talk page. I am a mere amateur at editing, and would welcome some constructive feedback and help. HenryTemplo (talk) 17:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

A goat for you!
All yours well done for 100 edits 🥳 henrytemplo

The mumble bug (talk) 16:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC) 

Duchy Tenants Association
Hello, HenryTemplo,

In your edit summary of this now-deleted article, you questioned whether you had done a proposed deletion appropriately. Well, yes and no. The tagging was fine and you stated in your edit summary that you were doing a PROD (very important), but you neglected to post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. When you are tagging pages for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/TFD/etc.), things are made easier if you make use of Twinkle which is an editing tool on Wikipedia. Once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", well, then Twinkle will post these notices for you which makes thing easy and convenient. I recommend you try it out as notification is an important step in the deletion process. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:31, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Thankyou for you feedback, Liz! And also thanks for introducing me to twinkle, Will definitely use it in future. Again, thankyou,

HenryTemplo (talk) 16:10, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coincidance (song)
 The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:HenryTemplo help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 11:31, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks me! HenryTemplo (talk) 11:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Good work. But maybe leave the book be, as It is a coincidence that you prodded the similarly named book. I've moved book to (book). thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback! However, in regards to the book, while yes, the book is similarly named as the article, it hasn’t got any references, and I’m not confident about its notability (I should of probably said that in the summary). If you disagree, that’s fine, we can discuss it on the talk page for that article. Thanks for moving the page though! And again, thankyou for the feedback. HenryTemplo (talk) 12:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Coincidance (song)


A tag has been placed on Coincidance (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 14:07, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Coincidance (song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coincidance (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Coincidance (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kingoflettuce (talk) 21:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Coincidance (song)


A tag has been placed on Coincidance (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Hitler teapot for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hitler teapot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hitler teapot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kingoflettuce (talk) 13:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Nothing personal dude, just realised you did the Coincidance one too!!! I must say again, you're a great editor, and this has nothing to do with your writing skills---it's not really your fault that the topic is inherently notable. Similar to the Coincidance article, the Hitler teapot one was well-crafted but I'm just not seeing evidence of notability. I'm really sorry Kingoflettuce (talk) 13:33, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * My advice is to stick to topics that aren't so recent and have a range of sources covering them. You'll develop an instinct as to how 'trivial' something is over time. Harry Whanslaw, which I see you've added a fair bit to, is a great example of what you should be focusing your talent on! :) Kingoflettuce (talk) 13:36, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I guess you could say it was a … Coincidance :) . No hard feelings, I see the funny side! Thanks for the advice as well, it’s appreciated. I’ll check out the deletion page, do a little defending, and find some more things to do while I do. All the best, HenryTemplo (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Tho I might have erred in the Hitler case, somebody dug up sources I hadn't managed to find. :P Still I find we are becoming increasingly inclusionist... Kingoflettuce (talk) 15:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries, we all make errors, especially me! Rightio, thanks for your wise and kind words, I’ll be off editing, enjoy your day! HenryTemplo (talk) 15:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * On second thought, a closer inspection of the sources show that they're pretty frivolous (expectedly when the teapot itself is frivolous so there's nothing much that can be spun off it). I think the fundamental problem is there really isn't a need to create an article for something that goes viral or gets a lot of clicks on the Web. It detracts from the spirit of an encyclopedia, even a non-paper one like Wikipedia. In this case, the most 'substantive' reporting all come from March 2013, suggesting that this doesn't have any lasting influence. Kingoflettuce (talk) 15:36, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Mmmmm, should we take this to the deletion page? I’d be up for discussion there. HenryTemplo (talk) 15:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * With all due respect to the folks there, some of them seem to be making knee-jerk comments just based off how the article/overall sourcing "look". I've pretty much reiterated my thoughts there anyhow. Sometimes an article that really ought to be deleted gets kept, and vice versa. That's the game here. Kingoflettuce (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I suppose so, but I suppose it is just Wikipedia… (if I didn’t keep telling myself that I would of quit editing a while back!). Well, have a good day and all :) . HenryTemplo (talk) 15:48, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You too Mr Templo. Just know that some pesky editor (if not me :)) will tag your stuff for deletion if you keep working on topics like this, and I think it can be quite disheartening especially if you've invested a lot into it. Much harder to get rid of a page about a 20th-century puppeteer than it is something about a random Hitler-like teapot that was talked about for just a few days! Kingoflettuce (talk) 15:55, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I’m surprised it’s not the other way round to be fair! To be honest, I generally preferred working on the pop-culture articles (mainly because they are so much easier to source!) but I will still bare your far more experienced wisdom in mind when choosing articles to create. Well, ‘tis the nature of Wikipedia, as you said :) . HenryTemplo (talk) 16:04, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for John Henry Bell
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Wally the Walrus
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 26 April 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * How nice! Thanks for letting me know! Enjoy your day! HenryTemplo (talk) 05:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Hitler teapot
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for entertaining us! - Congrats also for the stats for the walrus! - The teapot is also featured as the "quirky" entry of Portal:Germany. I changed it there, because I am not sure in which sense we can say "looked like" - as if it was in the past - and will say so at WP:ERRORS. - --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the kind words! Also, thanks for adjusting the wording on the hook, I’m not amazing at speling and grammer’s. Have a amazing day! HenryTemplo (talk) 08:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 04:28, 1 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Wow! This is great, Thankyou! @Theleekycauldron (or anyone else), you wouldn’t happen to know why the article got 270,000 pageviews the following day? It’s kind of weird… and exciting … and confusing. Anyway, have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 11:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * holy crap, I have no idea! Promoted nearly 2,000 hooks, I've never seen anything like that. I don't see any ridiculous chatter on social media or news articles, so... theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 18:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok, I’ll see if there’s a noticeboard that I could ask at… any ideas which noticeboard could potentially explain this unusual occurrence? HenryTemplo (talk) 18:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Piper’s Hole
Hello! Your submission of Piper’s Hole at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 23:35, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

anonymous user from 216.x translations from sr:
Hi there. I noticed you published Draft:Smail Smajo Ferović, but the article was one in a long line of articles 'translated from Serbian Wikipedia' by an anonymous user who is known for bad work, cf. Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1088. I've identified a number of basic sourcing issues in the article, corrected or tagged them, and reverted the promotion to main space until they're addressed. If you notice further articles like this, please apply more rigor. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 05:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your feedback! I wasn't aware of this users work when I approved the draft, I took the Serbian sources with good faith, as I don't speak Serbian... so I wasn't aware of any major sourcing issues, apart from the layout. I will certainly consider your feedback in future, Thankyou, and have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 05:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Enquiry about reference
Hi Henry, thanks that you reviewed my article Draft: Everbright Securities International. You left a comment that this submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. Actually I had added the official documents from Hong Kong Exchanges as references to the relevant part of the article. I want to know why they can not be valid references. Zxcvbnm123411 (talk) 03:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Zxcvbnm123411


 * Hello, @Zxcvbnm123411. I would strongly recommend, if you haven't already, reading the rules on notability, especially regarding the notability policy for companies and organisations. In order for draft article in question to be suitable for Wikipedia, the subject has to be notable. Unfortunately, I do not think that the references currently prove notability, as they are either primary sources (stock transfer records) or reprinted press releases (as far as I could tell), which, sadly, do not prove notability. I'm sorry that your draft was declined, but sometimes, no matter how well written or referenced an article is, if the subject is not notable, then the article is not suitable for Wikipedia. Regardless, I wish you have a good day! :) - HenryTemplo (talk) 06:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, HenryTemplo

Thank you for creating Lunch shaming.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Why Thankyou! I hope you have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Requesting review Draft:Pallab_Bhattacharyya
Please review the draft after modification since AfD. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 08:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I would, but I feel it may be more appropriate for a more experienced AfC reviewer to review that draft, as I cannot accurately judge many of the sources, due to me not being familiar with Indian media and the various languages spoken there, so I wouldn’t be able to accurately judge the notability of the subject. Sorry! HenryTemplo (talk) 09:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @HenryTemplo please go through citations. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 10:12, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * As I said, I feel that I am too inexperienced presently to accurately judge the large volume of references, due to the reasons explained above. Sorry! HenryTemplo (talk) 10:38, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Requesting review Draft:Gazeta_e_pavarur
Hi, can you please review the article again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Junuzsalihi99 (talk • contribs) 01:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid I don't think I can make a well-informed descision about the notability of the subject, so I am going to let a more experienced reviewer have a look at it. Sorry! HenryTemplo (talk) 07:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Request for review & approval of Wikipedia Page/Article
Hi Henry Templo, please I need help with my article page with review and approval it has been 6 months now. I will appreciate any feedback. warm regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by George Nyiam (talk • contribs) 12:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, @George Nyiam, I'm afraid I can't help you if I don't know which draft you want to be reviewed! Sorry! HenryTemplo (talk) 12:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I dont really how to tag you to my SandBox but will drop a link here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:George_Nyiam/sandbox George Nyiam (talk) 13:00, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see, the reason why it hasn't been reviewed is it hasn't been submitted for review through the Articles for Creation process. If you want me to, I can do that now (or soon). :) HenryTemplo (talk) 13:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @George Nyiam, I've submitted the draft to AfC, and moved it to the draft space. HenryTemplo (talk) 13:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * okay many thanks. i have edited the draft and resubmitted again. George Nyiam (talk) 15:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Review of Draft:Interoperable Master Format
Hi Henry. Many thanks for your speedy review of Draft:Interoperable Master Format. Please could I ask for a little advice on which bits are written in the wrong style? I suppose Architecture para#3 talking about benefits tries to explain why the format exists could be / should be made more fact based with citations. The Example uses section was intended to show people that IMF is real (the links were provided to me by the BBC, Netflix & Disney). The history section felt useful to an IMF novice, but adds no helpful information to what the format is. Are there gaps that I have not addressed? I really value your input. I am much more used to writing International Standards than Wikipedia articles. I look forward to your feedback. Thanks, Mrmxf (talk) 12:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, @Mrmxf! When I declined the draft, I was worried about the way things were phrased, as they weren’t necessarily in line with Wikipedia’s policy on Neutral point of view (NPOV). Phrases like “At the heart” also don’t really fit the formal tone of an encyclopaedia like Wikipedia. I hope I’ve adressed your questions, and if you have any more questions, please feel free to ask them here or at the Teahouse. Happy editing! :) HenryTemplo (talk) 13:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. Thanks for the speedy reply. Mrmxf (talk) 13:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Your welcome! Enjoy your day! HenryTemplo (talk) 14:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Isles of Scilly
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Isles of Scilly you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period via this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Isles_of_Scilly/GA1 Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of UnidentifiedX -- UnidentifiedX (talk) 19:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you! HenryTemplo (talk) 19:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Isles of Scilly
The article Isles of Scilly you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Isles of Scilly for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of UnidentifiedX -- UnidentifiedX (talk) 16:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Clarification on review of Draft:Dibrospidium chloride
Thank you for your fast review of the draft, but since your review is vague, I can't know what you mean by "the existing article on the same subject". You and I know you can't post English (within the expected behavior of the Russian Wikipedia) on the Russian article on this medicine, which is the subject of this article. Are you just saying to look for a subject or am I missing something in my searches? There are several chemotherapy and drug discovery articles this could go under, are you suggesting I put this information on all of them? I'm not trying to be difficult nor am I trying to avoid your suggestion, I just can't do much with it. Also, there are shorter stubs out there than my article so I'm not exactly sure if I understand you on that either. I can't do better in the future if I don't understand you. Lalaithan (talk) 23:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, @Lalaithan! In regards to the draft, since I am not at all an expert when it comes to chemotherapy, I thought that, since the article was very shortl it would be better as a part of a larger article. Of course, I'm not sure which article, since I'm no expert on the subject, but if you are an expert, then you can use your best judgment to decide where best to put the information. Happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 06:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for getting back to me. I wouldn't call myself an expert in biochemistry, but I work in the field, haha. It's alright, it's being addressed at WikiProject Pharmacology. Sorry for the critical reply, I'm still recovering from COVID-19 and have dumb-dumb moments. Lalaithan (talk) 03:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * That's alright, I hope you get well soon! Happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 06:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Rejection of Draft for Riya Mukherjee Bio
Hi HenryTemplo,

I'm trying to make a biography of podcaster, RJ and movie maker Riya Mukherjee. Several of my drafts have ben rejected for not using reputed sources. This time I have used mostly sources of leading Indian media houses like Hindustan Times, Times of India, Economic Times or Indian Express. But before submitting another draft I'd like to get your feedback on what I should do to get my draft through. You commented on it recently.

Thanks

Gwenzil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwenzil (talk • contribs) 02:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, @Gwenzil! In regards to the draft Riya Mukherjee, when I declined it, It was quite lacking in inline citations to back up the information presented in the article, but having a quick glance now shows that this issue has been (largely) addressed, so that is no longer the problem (well done for sorting that out). However, your next hurdle is demonstrating notability, which is a little tricky, and also something (that I myself found out) no amount of editing can solve. However, I would say that the draft is probably improved enough now to resubmit. Happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 06:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Henry Templo,
 * I have re-submitted the draft keeping your feedback in mind specifically. Do let me know if it is good to go now? Thanks Gwenzil (talk) 10:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, @Gwenzil, thanks for getting in touch again! The draft looks better, although there's a few NPOV and prose issues here and there that you might want to review (and you might need to remove the "early life" section as it doesn't have a citation to back it up). At this point, I don't think I can help any further, as now any reviewer needs to asses the sources to ensure the subject is notable, and unfortunately I am not familiar with Indian media, so I do not think I am qualified to review the draft now. You might want to see if anyone from a relevant WikiProject might be able to help and review the draft (maybe WikiProject India?). Good luck with the draft and have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 13:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Decline of Draft:European Youth Parliament Belgium
Hi HenryTemplo! Thank you for taking the time to review my submission. As for your reasoning to decline the draft at this time, it said: "This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article". As it is quite vague, even when consulting the Writing better articles page, I would kindly ask to give me an example in the draft where this is not the case or give some more feedback in general. Then I can work on the quality of the draft in order to resubmit it. Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jefdruyts (talk • contribs) 14:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, @Jefdruyts! When writing an article, as you probably know, you must always make sure it is written in the Neutral Point of View (NPOV). In this case, you should probably avoid having a section titled "Mission and Values" and make sure you avoid promotional wording like "come together to celebrate European connections and form their own solutions to current European issues.", which sound very promotional rather than neutral, formal and encyclopaedic. I hope I've answered your question, and happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 15:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello HenryTemplo! I looked at your last comment and implemented some changes in the 'History' section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1810:4D7F:C700:BCA8:1B8C:ACDD:8571 (talk) 15:12, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello again! I hate to say it but there are still some NPOV issues, mainly in the prose of the History section, although you've done a great job at addressing some of the more glaring examples. This is the problem when editing with a conflict of interest, as it can sometimes be hard to "step back" metaphorically and write in a completely neutral and encyclopaedic way on subjects which you have a COI in, no matter how hard you may try. For me, what stood out was this sentence: "The EYP grew from a small school project in 1987 in Fontainebleau in France to the largest network for political debate, intercultural exchange and civic education for young people in Europe.". This sentence reads like the "about" or "history" page of the EYP's website, rather than a neutral encyclopaedia article, which would probably say something more to-the-point like: "The EYP started as a school project in 1987 in Fontainebleau, France." (for example). Asides from the aforementioned NPOV issues, you might want to add more citations to reliable, secondary, independent sources, to verify the information in the article and to demonstrate notability. Good luck, happy editing and have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Decline of Draft: American Long Distance Hikers Association-West
You recently declined an article I wrote. I am not sure if I put the "request to delete" code in the right place -- can you please confirm that I did, and that the article has been deleted. I believed that my edits and the addition of several reliable, independent sources (a major regional newspaper, a national magazine) solved the problem of notability; I see that you disagree, but I'm afraid I can't put any more time into this and will leave it for someone else to tackle at some other time. Thank you. Geophiliac (talk) 16:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, @Geophiliac! Just to confirm, yes, the draft has been deleted, so the delete tag was done correctly. I hope you find some new articles which you can work on, in fact, may I suggest you join a WikiProject? There's loads of different ones, you might be interested in WikiProject Geography. I will also say that proving notability is a tricky affair on Wikipedia, I myself had an article I started deleted because of the subject not being notable, but from my experience, it's best to never take it personally and move on in a positive way. Anyways, have a great day and happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 18:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Not taking it personally -- just have too much on my plate to fuss with it just now; I am enjoying getting to know Wikipedia and will check out your project suggestions. Thanks. Geophiliac (talk) 18:49, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Great to hear, I wish you the best of luck with your various undertakings, both on and off Wikipedia! I hope you continue enjoying Wikipedia, and once again, have a great day and happy editing! :) HenryTemplo (talk) 18:53, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Piper's Hole
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Brilliant, thanks for letting me know! HenryTemplo (talk) 08:14, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

== Hi Henry, thanks for your good critical eye on the Sans Souci article. I revised and resubmitted. Don't know whether you'll be my next reviewer, but wanted to thank you for the kind words and speedy review: not 4 months; more like 4 hours!DET (talk) 18:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC) ==

Request on 18:44:07, 4 June 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Davidevanthomas
Hi Henry, thanks for your good critical eye on the Sans Souci article. I revised and resubmitted. Don't know whether you'll be my next reviewer, but wanted to thank you for the kind words and speedy review: not 4 months; more like 4 hours!DET (talk) 18:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

DET (talk) 18:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Your welcome, @Davidevanthomas! Have a great day and good luck with the draft! HenryTemplo (talk) 20:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Intestine-on-a-chip
Hello! Your submission of Intestine-on-a-chip at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BuySomeApples (talk) 23:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Request on 02:18:45, 23 June 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Sumaiya alvi 29
Can you guide me what is the issue with this article?

Sumaiya alvi 29 (talk) 02:18, 23 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello @Sumaiya alvi 29! At the moment, the draft has quite a few problems. First, it is not written neutrally: "...Mazhar is very talented and a well known actor" is not very neutral. Secondly, there is a lack of inline citations, which are generally required when writing about living people. If you want to fix this issue, see referencing for beginners. Happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 06:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Request on 18:23:25, 26 June 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by R0ck$
Hi, can you please inform me of the changes I need to make to the draft to make it possible for it to me published? I have cited multiple credible sources that are all secondary and can cite precedent from other Wikipedia pages pertaining bands that I have referred to for making this article as tidy as possible. Please provide details of the changes that are to be made.

R0ck$ (talk) 18:23, 26 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, @R0ck$! I would love to help, but the draft at the moment has quite a few sources to review, and unfortunately I'm quite busy off-wiki at the moment preparing for a short trip away, so I don't think I could give you any in-depth feedback at present. Maybe try the Teahouse? Have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 20:29, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Intestine-on-a-chip
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

WP:ANYBIO
Hi there, you declined Frederick Robert Newton earlier with the message: A couple more sources like the first one should prove notability, have a great day! The source that you were referring to was an Australian Dictionary of Biography article - that's a clear pass of WP:ANYBIO #3 and should be an auto-accept (once you check it isn't copyvio). Thanks, by the way, for your consistently positive tone with editors/articles in the AfC process. -- asilvering (talk) 20:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Thankyou for pointing that out, @Asilvering! I'll take your feedback on board for future reviews. And as I always say, have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 20:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Buddy Pine-Syndrome.webp
Thanks for uploading File:Buddy Pine-Syndrome.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

No notification
HenryTemplo I have received no notification of my draft Nikashi's AfC acceptance. Probably you have forgotten "Inform to Author". - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 01:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)


 * My apologies, it does appear that I forgot! Sorry! Anyway, have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 07:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scilly Boys has been accepted
 Scilly Boys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Scilly_Boys help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much! Have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 16:14, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi HenryTemplo, thanks for the creation of the Scilly boys and the DYK nomination. I've read the article primarily to learn where the record is at and the record to beat and then while reading it, I also wanted to learn, at what point of the journey they capsized, ok day thirteen, but where? Near, New York, the Caribbean islands, Madeira or close to the goal? I didn't see anything about, but I guess this might that particular addition would increase readership satisfaction.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 04:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello @Paradise Chronicle, I think much of this information is in the Island Parish documentary, which unfortunately is unavailable to watch on the BBC's website. I do remember being shown the documentary however,   and I think they were about 600 miles away from land when they capsized (?), and I think they where trying to beat the record for the shortest 4-man transatlantic row (?). Of course, I can't put this in the article without verifying it with what it says in the documentary, so I need to find a way of watching it! Anyway, Thank you for the feedback, have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 08:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Schopenhauer would be proud

 * I should like to add that this doesn't mean you're expected to be this friendly & enthusiastic all the time. We all have bad days, so feel free to have a temporary lapse in politeness every once in a while (it can feel liberating), as long as it's not too extreme ;) --LordPeterII (talk) 19:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thankyou so much! My first barnstar! I must remember to smash that thank button for this! Annnndddd, as I always (try) to say, have a great day, and happy editing! :) HenryTemplo (talk) 19:03, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Decline of Anjali bio page
This person could be the leader of over five million people in British Columbia and a lot of people need to know who she is. Please approve this page. 38.34.85.216 (talk) 19:07, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, IP user, welcome to my talk page! Regarding Draft:Anjali Appadurai, the reason why I declined the article was because it read like an advertisement or a promo piece, which is a problem, as all Wikipedia articles need to be written neutrally (see WP:Neutral Point of View). Fortunately, a user (I'm assuming you?) has done a great job at clearing up the most egregious NPOV violations. However, your next hurdle is demonstrating notability, which is defined slightly differently on Wikipedia. In order to be considered notable on Wikipedia and merit an article, the subject should be covered in multiple independent, secondary, reliable sources in non-trivial detail. Now, this requires a reviewer to assess the sources, which I am not really good at doing, especially when it comes to Canadian media and politics! You're best if waiting for a more experienced reviewer to come along and review the draft.
 * Also, a very important note: If you are in anyway connected with Anjali Appadurai, please thoroughly read WP:Conflict of Interest. Good luck with the draft, have a great day and happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Freya (walrus)

 * Thanks for letting me know! Have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 07:42, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

America: Land of the FreeKS article
Hello, I used an in depth film review from Variety Magazine as a reliable source, which I've seen in many Wikipedia articles and would also be accepted at the academic level. The film is by a notable director, as well, who also has an extensive Wikipedia page. I've seen comparable pages, so I really don't understand why it's not enough. Any help is appreciated.

Kind Regards

2pisces28 (talk) 12:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello @2pisces28! In regards to Draft:America: Land of the FreeKS, I'd say it's pretty borderline notable at the moment, so I'm going to leave it for a more experienced reviewer. Feel free to resubmit the draft now. Good luck and have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 14:47, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Stena (walrus) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stena (walrus) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stena (walrus) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mooonswimmer 22:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Freya (walrus)
Vanamonde 00:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 06:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Scilly Boys
Vanamonde 00:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Augustus Smith (politician)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Augustus Smith (politician) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 11:20, 3 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Thankyou, @Mike Christie! Just to let you know, I haven't currently got access to some the sources used in the article, as I've had to return them, however, I have ordered online both Richard Larn's book and Sam Llewellyn's book on Augustus Smith, and they should be with me soon, and I also have many other books which have information on him. Please let me know if this is a problem! HenryTemplo (talk) 11:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't think it'll be an issue -- neither of the issues I've raised in the review requires access to the sources. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:56, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Brilliant, Thankyou and have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 12:01, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Augustus Smith (politician)
The article Augustus Smith (politician) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Augustus Smith (politician) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 12:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Thankyou so much for the speedy review! Happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 12:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Draft:A Loud House Christmas
The draft article, Draft:A Loud House Christmas, how can it be improved so it can be turned into a live article? Cwater1 (talk) 00:53, 6 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for improving the article, @Cwater1! The article is a lot better, but roughly half of the article is still just plot summary, although you did add some additional info about the background. However, your next challenge is to prove notability. I'd recommend reading up WP:GNG and WP:NFILMS, and ensure the draft meets those requirements. Good luck and have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 06:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Cwater1 (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Augustus Smith (politician)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Tom Dorrien-Smith
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

GAR for Isles of Scilly
Isles of Scilly has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:34, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Draft on Sanket Goel
Hey @HenryTemplo, a couple of months back you gave a comment on Draft:Sanket Goel and since they've I've worked on it. Can you help me out with it?? Shashy 922 (talk) 13:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Shashy 922, sorry for the late reply! I've had another look, and you've done a good job on the external links, which is what I commented on. However, I don't think I'm in a position to help you further with the article, unfortunately! Your best bet is to wait, or maybe ask a relevant WikiProject for advice. Good luck with the draft! HenryTemplo (talk) 19:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * thanks a lot for the advice! Shashy 922 (talk) 02:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Your welcome, have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 10:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

DYK for 2023 United Kingdom pupil protests
Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert Smith-Dorrien for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Smith-Dorrien is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Robert Smith-Dorrien until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Trendupp Awards
Heyyy!!! I wanted to see if you can help take a look at this draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Trendupp_Awards I submitted for review. I'm still looking at ways to make it better. However, I really believe it is ready to be published. Kindly help take a look if you can as this will also improve my editing as well. Thank you very much. Olakunle Rufai (talk) 23:14, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

False chart performance in accepted AFC article
Hello. I thought I let you know that the article creator at Jungle Cruise (soundtrack) added false charting performance before you accepted this article at AFC. I removed one of them as it did not appear in the citation and tagged the other one as I'm not 100% sure. Thanks! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC)