User talk:Henrymark

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- evrik 15:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Christopher Columbus
Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you.  Sango  123    (e)  23:20, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Latino
Hi there, I was wondering what your reasoning is to put in that 'Latino' is an Italian word, if it is also a word in other languages. Words aren't necessarily restricted to one language, and Latino could also be argued to be short for the spanish 'Latinoamericano'. Latino isn't at all only restricted to Italy, therefore I'd like to know why we should have it as you wrote it. Also, I might recommend adding edit summaries to your edits to clarify your reasoning more, otherwise people often have misconceptions about what other people are editing. Thanks. Feel free to reply here or on my talk page.CowmanTalk 19:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Template:Chicano/Mexican-American
Hello,

I reverted your blanking of this template in part because you didn't give a reason in the edit summary. I'm not familiar with the history of this template or its applicability. -- Curps 08:57, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Notable Hispanic Americans and Columbus Day
I have reverted your various unjustified removal of content in these articles. Please make sure to justify such edits with an edit summary or on talk pages. Circeus 17:47, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Etymology on Latino
Hi there, I proposed some questions concerning the significance of declaring that Latino is an Italian word in Talk:Latino. Could you please explain your reasoning for adding the note that Latino is an Italian word? Thanks. Cowman109Talk 20:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Whats up man? Im still at work for the next 8 hours and dont have much to do, so we can revert constantly or establish some dialogue on the issue. Please explain your reasoning on the talk page of latino. --Burgas00 18:10, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Three-revert rule
Concerning your edits on Latino, you are possibly violating the Three-revert rule (though not within 24 hours). To help settle these escalating matters, please see the discussion concerning the etymology of Latino at Latino Talk. Thanks. Cowman109Talk 17:40, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

3RR
Please be careful not to violate Three-revert rule. If you have concerns about the content of an article, it is important to voice them on the article's talkpage rather than making changes without consensus. Violation of the rule will result in a temporary block from editing. If you don't feel comfortable expressing yourself in English, feel free to use the language you are most comfortable with. Someone will translate. Thanks, --Rockero 22:37, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.--Rockero 04:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on . Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. --Rockero 07:39, 20 April 2006 (UTC) I was hasty and didn't look at the edit. I apologize.--Rockero 07:45, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Regarding reversions made on April 28 2006 (UTC) to Latino
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours.

Please become a bit less obsessive. And please learn to talk more rather than simply reverting.

William M. Connolley 19:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. RexNL 21:46, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Mwanner | Talk 21:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you deliberately introduce incorrect information into a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- digital_m  e  ( Talk  ) (  Contribs  ) 22:02, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
Blocked You have been blocked for vandalism for 24 hours. To contest this block, add the text  on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. --Kungfu Adam (talk) 22:06, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Henry Mark: Why do you vandalise wikipedia with such insistence? Leave the Latino page alone ,please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Burgas00 (talk • contribs)

3rr
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. --Rockero 19:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop reverting Latino
I understand you are trying to improve the Latino article, but your intentions are unclear to others due to your lack of edit summaries and your refusal to see talk:Latino. Please join us in the discussion on how to improve the article before making major edits removing the believed etymology. Thanks. Cowman109Talk 19:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

HenryMark what is your problem? Do you have mental health issues? Why vandalise articles randomly? Does it turn you on or something?--Burgas00 16:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)