User talk:Henrysdreams

July 2007
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Edward James Olmos. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Ckatz chat spy  19:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Edward James Olmos. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ckatz chat spy  19:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I would suggest that you try to achieve consensus on the talk page, as you are now in danger of violating the three- revert rule. I'm not interested in an edit war, especially not over an external link. However, there are specific guidelines regarding what is and what is not acceptable. The site in question is unofficial, has a very non-neutral tone, and does not add anything to the article. I understand that you may wish to see a site you care about linked from Wikipedia. However, Wikipedia is not a fan-site directory, and the fact that other pages have links to sites that may or may not be suitable does not justify the inclusion of one that is not. Again, please discuss this rather than just reverting. If you continue to add the site, you may end up getting blocked - and that would not benefit anyone. Thanks. --Ckatz chat spy  20:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)