User talk:Henryswagger08

Speedy deletion nomination of Henry J. Acevedo
Hello Henryswagger08,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Henry J. Acevedo for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Knyzna1 (talk) 15:47, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to FIFA World Cup awards— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --I am  k6ka  Talk to me!   See what I have done  00:15, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Henry Club


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Henry Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Phantom Tech (talk) 21:19, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to The Alvin Show, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Digifan23 (talk) 09:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Henry J. Acevedo


A tag has been placed on Henry J. Acevedo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KylieTastic (talk) 13:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Chucky 7) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Chucky 7, Henryswagger08!

Wikipedia editor Vinodtiwari2608 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please correct the page formatting"

To reply, leave a comment on Vinodtiwari2608's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Chucky 7 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chucky 7 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chucky 7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 13:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Your recent edit to 2001 appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  15:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2001. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  16:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

January 2018
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Cole Sprouse, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denniss (talk) 14:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 14:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)