User talk:Henryyan

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! &mdash; Instantnood 11:39, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

HKWNB, HKCOTW, Current events
Hello Henry. Thanks for your contributions to some Hong Kong-related articles. You might be interested to take a look at HK wikipedians' notice board, HK Collaboration of the Week and Current events in Hong Kong and Macao. Happy editing! &mdash; Instantnood 11:39, September 7, 2005 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello Henryyan and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Anomaly detection, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

We surely do appreciate contributions to the articles, but we do not accept what is called Citation spam. All your contributions seem to be focused around mentioning your research, rather than actually contributing to the article. As you apparently are knowledgeable on the subject, please try to contribute to the article instead! Please read the section citing yourself in the wikipedia page on Conflict of interest. Thank you! --91.52.28.51 (talk) 07:41, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry for undoing your edits again. But I still have some concerns. First of all, your field of anomaly detection in patterned textures seems to be a tiny sub-domain only. My concern is that you are pushing the article too much into your view of the problem. Secondly, you added a lot of lists, alternatives, synonyms, names, words that make the article quite unreadable, contribute little content, are not encyclopedic style, repeat themselves, etc. (sorry for the pun, but I hope you see what I did't like - too many alternatives separated with comma) E.g. Manual of Style/Lead section discusses some of the points to consider in particular for the lead section. Readers have a short attention span, so we need to keep the introduction crisp. This is not SEO -- no need to give all the alternate search terms to boost Google rankings; the article clearly isn't optimal right now, but we should try to improve it, not make this even worse. Finally, I also reverted your edits to the "popular" list. One-class-SVM is a very popular technique and deserves to be named on its own (it is mentioned in books, and there are a number of related works with 300-500 citations) - it's not just one learning technique, but it is the direct translation of the "rare object" anomaly concept to SVMs. Note that I also dropped the "conditional anomaly" that was there before your edits: 50 citations on Google isn't "popular". We should focus on the Kumar survey, with 750 citations, for example, and related textbook sections. --91.52.6.30 (talk) 07:30, 26 November 2012 (UTC)