User talk:Hephzibah Yohannan

Three copies of same article?
I've noticed that you created Reflexive Self-Consciousness, Reflexive self-consiousness and Reflexive self-consciousness as three separate articles. I've added some templates and stub categories to each in order to help attract more editors that can help you with these articles. I'm not sure exactly what you are doing, but you may want to look at Merging and moving pages and Redirect to help sort things out. Thanks. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 20:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help
I knew there were two, didn't realise there were three. I was having problems because my links didn't work if some were in lower case (as name of a concept) and some were in title case (as name of a book) - so I put in one with each case. I'm also not sure if I am using the right method to reply to your messages. Hephzi 20:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


 * You can reply on my talk page or yours, but I'm more likely to notice it as soon as I log in if it's on mine. You can also seek help from many others, such as the help desk. I may not be around when you need help. Normally, Wikipedia internal links depend on case, but articles (except for special cases such as a person's name or the title of a book or movie) only have the first word capitalized. I hope that helps. Well, I'm logging off soon so don't be shy about asking other helpful people. There are a lot of us around. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 21:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Reflexive self-consciousness


A tag has been placed on Reflexive self-consciousness requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Käthe Schuftan.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Käthe Schuftan.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Käthe Schuftan has been accepted
 Käthe Schuftan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Hephzibah_Yohannan help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nice work, but note that Original Research is not allowed
Hello, overall your article on Schuftan is a great contribution, but please note that you must removed any WP:Original research from the article. Encyclopedias contain only already-documented facts. We cannot include unpublished opinions, conjecture, etc. It's fine to say "Professor so-and-so theorizes [citation to said prof's essay]" but it is not admissible to say "I conclude that..." So please weed through the article to remove any personal opinions, things you personally now, results or your personal phone calls, reading of old letters, etc.

Also, note that an article is not an advocacy page, so personal appeals like They would welcome any information about her life and work are not allowed.

I'm glad you're finding this a useful platform to share knowledge, but please do work within the boundaries of the rules so we can maintain consistent method across Wikipedia. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much, that's very encouraging Hephzi (talk) 20:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I have removed the original research Hephzi (talk) 20:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Käthe Schuftan. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. &mdash; kikichugirl  speak up! 20:20, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

1 February 2015
Question: I've tried, by looking at code, to add a Category page, "People from Manchester by Occupation: Artists" to add to my pages "Käthe Schuftan" and "Eugene Halliday" (that's Manchester UK) - but sorry, I can't figure out how to do it. If someone could help I would be most grateful. Hephzi (talk) 10:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Käthe Schuftan) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Käthe Schuftan, Hephzibah Yohannan!

Wikipedia editor WordSeventeen just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for creating this well thought out and researched article."

To reply, leave a comment on WordSeventeen's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

19 February 2015
I left a message on WordSeventeen's page - "Many thanks for your message on Käthe Schuftan's page"

And - Thank you for adding the new Category "People from Manchester by Occupation: Artists" to add to my pages "Käthe Schuftan" and "Eugene Halliday" (that's Manchester UK)

However, it's still not how I meant it to be - I think I must not have worded my question properly - I wanted it to be part of this page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:People_from_Manchester_by_occupation - so it would be: "Artists from Manchester". Then other artists can be added to the category.

Please could someone help? I think WordSeventeen may be busy, which I appreciate. Many thanks Hephzi (talk) 23:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margo Ingham (December 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Margo Ingham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Margo Ingham has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Margo Ingham. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margo Ingham (December 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheMagnificentist was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Margo Ingham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- TheMagnificentist (talk) 17:46, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margo Ingham (December 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Margo Ingham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  07:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Reflexive self-consciousness for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reflexive self-consciousness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Reflexive self-consciousness until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. TheManInTheBlackHat  (Talk)  20:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC)