User talk:Heraclitus0303

April 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 99.175.158.134 (talk) 21:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC) Not vandalizing, just updating the page with accurate information

Please do not add unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 99.175.158.134 (talk) 22:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection, or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or undone. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 99.175.158.134 (talk) 22:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 23:05, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Carrying on as blocked IP 12.9.138.10 . Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 23:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Please note that you were also blocked for abusing multiple accounts to continue your edit-warring, leading to the need to semi-protect the targeted article. If you want to be unblocked, you will have a lot of convincing to do - so I'd suggest you give a lot of thought to any further unblock request -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:17, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Non-notable? To who, the Wikipedia Squad? All who went to Thornton (during those years) not only rejoice when Renob is mentioned, but also yearn for those precious memories. I find it more ‘disruptive’ and ‘abusive’ when accurate information is deleted/removed. Please reconsider – All the Best.
 * 'Wikipedia squad' relies on guidelines at WP:NOTABILITY and WP:RELIABLE. A Google search confirms what we knew.... And then there's 'Renob' backwards, which kind of seals your intent. 99.175.158.134 (talk) 23:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * So, naked pictures of Renob in a magazine would suffice for notability (ala Melissa Holliday in Playboy)? Renob Johnson was more of an idea of fun, but was actually also an actual student - the intent was only to add a true, and notable, alumni with that same notion in mind.