User talk:Heralune

Categories
Hi Heralune

Congrats on starting a new draft at User:Heralune/sandbox/Amit Offir.

You may have noticed that I just edited it for the second time. This is because you had placed it in a category.

Per WP:USERNOCAT, content categories are only for articles, not drafts. So I have converted the categorisation to a link, which stops the article being placed in that category. If and when the article is moved or copied off your user space, then it can be categorised.

Hope this helps. -- Brown Haired Girl (talk) • (contribs) 10:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Sandbox pages in your own userspace are not allowed to be filed in articlespace categories at all. It's not about what is or isn't true about the subject, it's about the fact that the page isn't a finished mainspace article — so filing the page in article categories, regardless of whether they're true or not, is absolutely forbidden. Bearcat (talk) 21:20, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Help:BrownHairedGirl I have published today, with bad luck, the rewritten article about Amit Offir, I was sure correcting the big errors made in the past but it seems that nobody cares about my work. For perfect finiting, just for the Art maybe, can I put back now the categories ? Thanks for your feedback.

Speedy deletion nomination of Amit Offir


A tag has been placed on Amit Offir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Theroadislong (talk) 13:19, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * dearTheroadislongI am afraid you did not take the time to READ really my page. It has NOTHING to see with the deleted page in the page, really, have a look. My article is re written completely from scratch compared to what was written by the author previouly and I agreed it was not acceptable. I collected all informations and sources to built a serious page about this author. Instead of speedy deletion banner, maybe you could have explained me what's wrong in my work. It's not about Amit Offir, we are also contributors working hard, and it's hours and hours of my time behind this. I really spent a lot of time because I trust it's a good author and it's a + for wikipedia, people can find this author in the search and what he has done is interesting., like many other authors we can find.

Speedy deletion nomination of Amit Offir


A tag has been placed on Amit Offir, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk |c|em ) 13:42, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * talk Hi ! please read in detail what I have written on his biography, maybe the meaning is the same, but I have changed almost eveything, deleted the show off part, the Brazil and 500000 peebles funny things. I wrote in a neutral style. I dont think it's promotional page, it's a normal iography, with references about the books and articles with secondary sources. Check in the Hisotry of Amit Offir page I have done and see how much I have worked on it, it's absolutly NOT a copy paste of the previous one. Thanks for consideration, awaiting your feedback. Heralune [User talk:Heralune|Heralune]]

Amit Ofifr
RE this - if you have sufficient sources, yes you may recreate if the article has other content. However, do bear in mind that editors generally are more stringent notability-wise on recreated articles - you would have to have a very well sourced article - several reliable, independent, and in-depth pieces on the article. In this regard, if all you've found is an "article published about his book in a serbian Magazine" (so not about him, possible independence issues, and a source most editors would not be familiar with) - that's probably not sufficient. Icewhiz (talk) 10:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * No it's an article about him. My work had many sources compared to previous deleted page. I cannot create it again, I don"t have the copy of my job, it's already deleted, I asked someone to send me a copy, I hope to receive it. OMG !!! thanks Icewhiz for your nice reply, that helps.Heralune (talk) 11:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Heralune/sandbox has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Heralune/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linda Cable (November 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Linda Cable and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Linda Cable, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Linda_Cable Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Linda_Cable reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:23, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Draft:Wael Al Masri into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. ''In addition, you must put new articles through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process instead of creating them directly in mainspace. Thank you. '' GSS  (talk |c|em ) 13:39, 28 January 2019 (UTC)


 * TO GSS I ingored it was in the DRAFT section. I asked customer if the page has already been published, they said no, I just had to copy html from "everybodywiki" to create a page, it for a very low price. I immediatly mentionned to them the sources are absolutly NOT acceptable and will no go through AfC. I agree about situation. I will be more cautious in future. Heralune (talk) 10:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Linda Cable


Hello, Heralune. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Linda Cable".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 02:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pierre Lellouche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fillon government. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC)