User talk:Herbythyme/Arc1

Baring-Gould
It's just that it's an article about Sabine Baring-Gould, not an article about Pygmalion. You make a good point that Baring-Gould is obviously can't be the only inspiration for the play, and I did change the wording of the section to reflect it. But if people are curious about further sources for Pygmalion, they should follow the link to that article.

I came to the article because I was working on another article about a short story called "The Rats in the Walls", which is thought to have been inspired in part by Baring-Gould's Curious Myths. It's not the only work that's been cited as an inspiration, but I don't see any point in mentioning those other works in Baring-Gould's article. Do you?

It's true that the claim about Pygmalion is not well-sourced. I assume it's from the Warwick School history that is cited in the references. Nareek 23:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Little much
You are most welcome. Happy editing! Kukini 18:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

River Ashburn
I think you will find there are no notability criteria established for geographical features. So your suggestion that this article to be deleted due to the size of the river is unlikely to be accepted. Best Wishes Saga City 14:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * As a point of interest did you check just how many "rivers" have pretty much the same text and are stubs in the area? The editor didn't managed to get the categories right either.  -- Herby  talk to me 15:20, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * But this is exactly what stubs are for. They are like seeds; some grow, some die and others wither away. The comment about categories is not part of this argument unless you are implying that this is evidence that the contributor is failing in some way. Saga City 20:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

The river in question
How wide and how long are we talking? I tend to be a bit of an inclusionist on rivers and other bodies of water.  young american (ahoy-hoy) 14:54, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * PS---try not to call other people's takes on Wikipedia "silly." I did not take offense and I know that you meant none, but some people do tend to get a bit hot under the collar and would be offended. Its just a good rule of thumb to ensure that you can work on articles undustracted by those that tend to get huffy (you can scroll through my talk page archives for examples). Cheers.  young american  (ahoy-hoy) 14:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm, based on your description, I might be inclined to agree with you. It might not be a bad idea to go ahead and AfD it to let the lot of us Wikipedians sort it out. Cheers.  young american  (ahoy-hoy) 15:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I know you weren't. I was just giving you a heads up. There are some hot heads lurking about here. :)  young american  (ahoy-hoy) 15:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Be Bold! dammit :)  young american  (ahoy-hoy) 15:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

By the way...
Check out your userpage, you've received an award.  young american (ahoy-hoy) 15:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks..
...for noticing the northallerton request and edit. It's nice to get some feedback :). btw where did that great big Welcome pack above come from? I want one of them!--Rob2000 15:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

The Yorkshire thing (and I don't mean the pudding)
My guess is that it would survive an AfD (AfD is generally not considered to be the best solution for crap articles written on ok topics), do it seeming to be somewhat worthy of inclusion on some level. However, the pov in the article is, well, um, pov. My suggestion would be to work on removing the pov language yourself, It'll be good practice for you, as every experienced Wikipedian has had to salvage an article like this in the past in the name of the greater good, altruism, no one else is going to bother, etc.

If the author gives you any "I appreciate your work, but I work for them and I know how it should be" crap, try to explain to them the 'pedia's policy on POV and adverts. Be constructive and friendly, but firm. Anyways, good luck and don't be afraid to ask any more questions in the future. We are all in this together. Cheers.  young american (yo) 11:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Lustleigh Edits
Thanks for your feedback on the Lustleigh edits. Sorry if it sounded harsh. i have read the style guide, and i agree that historically, the article may have contained a fair amount of POV writing. That said, i think your axe was a little heavy handed and you left the article in a state which meant it didn't make a lot of sense. Looking up a village and finding a considerable treatise on Church bells isn't necesarily logical. I also thought it was a little strange to cut out references to village amenities - in context with the UK trend for not having this amenities, the presence of them is therefore unusual, and worthy of inclusion.

I agree with tidying up the article from a POV style. As far as histroy goes, as soon as get round to adding history of the village, i'll put that before "The Village Now", but the church bells should definately be further down the Wiki - and could even deserve their own Wiki page - what do you think?

That all said, some good imput and tidying there, but maybe a smaller pair of pruning shears, rather than a large axe? Regards, owain.davies —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Owain.davies (talk • contribs) 13:38, 17 Oct 2006  (UTC)

Ten Tors
In responce to your comment:

"OK - so why did you remove that piece. I stress I don't disagree with you and almost took it out myself (!) but it would interest me and genuinely - welcome. -"

I removed this as I thought it could be better worded. Ill leave it upto the 'regulars' on this site to make it better.

Im sorry but Im very new, and know very little about using this site. Ten Tors 07! Here We Come! 12:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BudeauxBoy (talk • contribs) 12:16, 27 Oct 2006 (UTC)

pic
Hi, this shot was made by 4wd, not me :-) --Ü 22:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Lustleigh
Thanks for your nice comment on my Talk Page concerning my heavy editing on the article. I puzzle over why contributors write in such an unencyclopedic way. My guess is that they don't read other relevant articles to see the Wikipedia style. Thanks again - Adrian Pingstone 18:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks
 Thank you for participating in my RfA discussion! I appreciate you contributing your voice to the debate and its outcome. I hope how I wield the mop makes you proud. Thanks! &mdash; Saxifrage

wikEd


Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.

wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus: • syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • more fixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages • convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjust the font size • and much, much more.

Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Often it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.

Cacycle 22:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your input!
Thank you for taking part in my RfA. The RfA was not successful, mostly because I did a pretty bad job of presenting myself. I'll run again sometime in the next few months, in the hopes that some will reconsider.

In the meantime, one of the projects I'm working on is A Wikimedia Administrator's Handbook. This is a wikibook how-to guide intended to help new administrators learn the ropes, as well as to simply "demystify" what adminship entails. If you are an administrator, please help out with writing it, particularly on the technical aspects of the tools. Both administrators and non-administrators are welcome to help link in and sort all of the various policies regarding the use of these tools on wikipedia in particular (as well as other projects: for example, I have almost no experience with how things work on wiktionary or wikinews). Users who are neither familiar with policy or the sysop tools could be of great help by asking questions about anything that's unclear. The goal is to get everything together in one place, with a narrative form designed to anticipate the reader's next question.

A second project, related but not entailed, is a book on wikimedia in general, with a history of how various policies evolved over time, interesting trivia (e.g., what the heck was "wikimoney" about?), and a history of how the wikimedia foundation itself came about and the larger issues that occurred during its history (such as the infamous "Spanish Fork").

Again, thanks for your input on the RfA, and thanks in advance for any help you might be able to provide for the handbook. -- SB_Johnny |talk|books 13:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

AWB
Hi Herby,

You're better asking whiteknight, I don't know what AWB is, and can't use it because I use a macintosh. If you have access to IRC, darklama is almost always on freenode #wikibooks (the man never sleeps!), and he'll definitely understand the issue better than I. -- SB_Johnny |talk|books 17:16, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

north york moors
you have changed the link to Let's Stay North York Moors to the official moors website.

this is the incorrect link,

lets stay north york moors is an independant website not linked to the offical moors website.

it is the only dedicated north york moors website.

ive changed it back

thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.43.21.229 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 27 Nov 2006  (UTC)

Vandalism
Quit the vandalism. You are breaking all the rules with your arbitrary, unreasoned edits. You are under warning. 62.64.222.199 09:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.64.222.199 (talk • contribs) 09:20, 21 Dec 2006  (UTC)

Ry Guy
Hello Herby! Remember me from Wikibooks? Well, this is where I'm most active. Check out my Userpage by clicking the "Ry" in my name and the talk page by clicking the "Guy". Bye! Ry Guy 13:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Devon Project
Wikiproject Devon is now up and running, if you want to pop over and have a look. Totnesmartin 18:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your consideration
Thank you for the consideration you gave to my RfA. To be chosen as an administrator requires a high level of confidence by a broad section of the community. Although I received a great deal of support, at this time I do not hold the level of confidence required, and the RfA did not pass. Yours was one of the neutral votes, and raised concerns. I am more than willing to discuss those concerns with you if you are interested. Please let me know. Sincerely, --BostonMA talk 13:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

bad vandal ip
The user that is using the ip 71.234.9.178 has benn actively vandalising and spamming on many more wikis than wikibooks wikicommens and wikipedia such as wikinews , meta wiki ,,wikiquote and has ben active thought ALL OF the wikimedia foundation AND MORE   and often creates dummy accounts to vandalise and spam with and often accuses users and wikimedia (especially street scholar)of misogyny and fascism  and is active on the spanish wikipedia but i simply dont have the time to add the links to the users other "contributions"--Crocadog 01:23, 1 February 2007(UTC) ps i share an ip with this user so ive created an account to avoid being confused with this user on wikipedia.--Crocadog 02:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello from the Foundation
Hi, this is Sandy from the Wikimedia Foundation. I just got hired as Press Officer. I am working on a very important presentation for the office, and I was hoping that someone from Wikibooks could help. I would just like to discus wikibook, its benefits, etc. I also will be using this in a press kit, etc. Could you please email at sordonez@wikimedia.org? I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks in advance. Sandy @ sordonez@wikimedia.org

James Duguid Picture
Torque magazine is a magazine run/sponsored by Evans Cycles UK LTD, it is a company magazine but as it is a publication is availible in the British Library. It is called Torque as it is a play on words for Talk, as it allows company employees to get information about their company and the race team (i.e the same team James Duguid rides for). Claire Beaumont is employed by Evans Cycles. Pictures taken on behalf of the company for press shoots, magazine or for the website are freely availible to other company employees on a database with no restrictions. If you would like to address the company on this matter please email either estates@evanscycles.com or claire.beaumont@evanscycles.com you can visit the website www.evanscycles.com and then find the contact section and send a letter or email about Torque magazine. Hope this is helpful Thanks Richard Twinn, sorry I don't have a user area, I was just reading about freeridering and saw some stuff, and I have previously worked for Evans

Commons
Please feel free, that wasn't me (though it is my account). Thanks for the heads up! Seraphimblade Talk to me 12:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi
You said: "I look at you talk page and remember why I stay away from WP . Anyway I am the same person on Wikibooks and an admin there too - we have just acquired a user called Darin Fidika!  I see you reviewed a final unblock request from him, anything you'd care to share (here or offline)?  Realising that there were issues with Nihonjoe (according to Darin) I felt it worth approaching you, hope you don't mind - cheers"


 * Yeah, even with a bot auto-archiving this talk page, it's almost too much to deal with. :)  I wasn't involved in the decision to block this user and there's not much I can add other than what's available in the contrib logs and on the talk page.  I know this person had a history of copyright and fair-use issues and created abusive sockpuppets to get around the block and continued to show no understanding of what he was doing incorrectly.  You'll probably have more luck with  who was more directly involved.  --Yamla 15:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I got involved when I noticed a speedy deletion tag on a stub Fidika had created. It was not an exact copy, more like a paraphrasing, so I sent it to AfD.  It turned out Fidika had been taking entries on Samurai from www.samuraiarchive.com and putting them on Wikipedia.  He made an effort to reword them somewhat, but they were bascally copied.  The AfD listed someting like 30-50 articles, but there were absolutely TONS more.  Take a look at User:Nihonjoe/Samurai for the project Nihonjoe and I embarked on by which we could delete these copyright violations.  We've deleted over 800 of these articles in which Fidika was basically the only contributor.  The mere scale of that should have been enough to justify Fidika's block, but there was more: despite all our attempts to explain copyright issues to Fidika, he was still copying things.  Basically, he took all the rules as saying "you can copy if you do X" and so he would make a half-hearted attempt at X in order to do the copying he wanted to do.  And he was still making large, fast, highly original contributions, which worried the heck out of me (although they're still around) - because he paraphrased, I have no idea if those contributions were copied or paraphrased from somewhere, but unlike ordinary users, I could no longer assume they weren't.  If you see Fidika on Wikibooks, and he makes any kind of copyright violation, you should give him a very short leash.  Mango juice talk 13:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikibooks
That isn't me. I sometimes create accounts on alternate projects and never use them but I definitely didn't create one on the 27th April. Thanks. --Deskana (fry that thing!)  11:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
- you're the best! :) - A l is o n  ☺ 07:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks :) Don't me, I'm just raiding userboxes. Mathiastck 15:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Hi Herby. I'd like to thank you for your support of my RfA. It was closed at surprising 75/0/0, so I'm an admin now. Max S em 22:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Peacent Rfa
Hello, Herbythyme. Thank you very much for your kind support on my recent Rfa, it succeeded! I feel thrilled and hope to live up to your expectations. If you spot me messing things up, feel free to shout at me :) Best wishes, PeaceNT 11:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Dear, thank you for you efforts to build consensus on my RfA. As you know, it was unsuccessful. I am not the type of editor to be disheartened by such a result, and have gained much experience.

I will run again, however I am concerned that I may see your name in the same place, for the same reasons. I would greatly appreciate knowing what I could do to earn your support next time.

If you have anything to contribute by way of improvements or comments, please don’t hesitate to tell me. Kind regards, Dfrg.msc 00:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Blocade
Why you blocade my IP? You said: "Please do not attempt such behaviour again as it will result in you being blocked". I accepted on you, and I declared it will not be happen again, so I don't know why needed on this - I only want improve the Commons. The other's bloced is ok. --Beyond silence 18:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Can you tell me why was good for me reply to you and cooperate?--Beyond silence 21:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Coverdale Tower
The picture was taken today (8 Aug 2007) and is fresh in the article Paignton. I'll look into uploading it to Commons, although sometimes copyright free images are transferred automatically. --Ianmacm 17:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Granite Track
Haytor Granite Tramway Thanks for adding the photograph of the trackwork. Rosser 16:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikibooks account
Is there a way that I can assume that account? Lara ♥Love 16:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Greetings Herbythyme, thank you very much for reverting vandalism on my user page. Pocopocopocopoco 04:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Your monobook is in Category:Wikipedia tools
Your monobook is in Category:Wikipedia tools. This is most likely because when you were copying scripts into yout monobook you accidentaly copied their category. Since your monobook is not a tool itself, please remove this category from it (like this). If you intend for your monobook to be a tool, please consider creating a subpage with a more descriptive name, and moving the category there. Thank you, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 23:57, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Good luck
Thanks! Nice to hear from you again! The RfA seems (touch wood!) to be going better than I'd expected, and a most pleasant side effect is encountering editors again from past collaborations. Espresso Addict 15:57, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I perhaps wouldn't have bothered if it weren't for getting hooked on DYK, but it's frustrating watching the hours pass while the admins who work there are all offline. And thanks for reminding me about tagging Commons images -- I've loaded a number there in past months, and keep meaning to get around to categorising them properly. Cheers, Espresso Addict 17:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Response
I've responded to you here and there. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

WBIG/Meta Request
Yup, it worked just fine. :) Many thanks for your help, I do greatly appericate it. :)  Take Care and Enjoy Your Weekend....<font color="#0000C8">NeutralHomer  T:C 21:42, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

beatbox.Be
Hello, sorry for my previous statements against you and A.B. I was way out of line and acted out of frustration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BeatboxBe (talk • contribs) 22:37, 23 Oct 2007

re:Hum
I've been avoiding it. Sounds like hard work and aggravation to me! Hence you all, always, have my appreciation for your efforts on behalf of the encyclopedia. -- SiobhanHansa 16:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * PS Are you not an admin here? -- SiobhanHansa 16:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No, but he should be. He doesn't have enough to do elsewhere. ++Lar: t/c 11:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I encourage Herby to think about becoming admin on en.wp. Anti-spam people have technical needs regarding blacklists and so forth where I imagine admin tools could be useful. EdJohnston 05:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

User Page
i was told my userpage would be protected, yet it was vandalized again. WillC 22:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

BryanBot
Ooh that looks like it could save me from missing all sorts of things! One small question/suggestion - I don't suppose it can look at crosswiki pages (so I could watch the two pages on meta that I'm interested in from my en account)? Thanks Herby. -- SiobhanHansa 12:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Log thing
Sorry, cannot do this. The principle has to be for occasional admins that everything is self explanatory. I cannot find the place you refer to the request numbers and that just means it won't happen, --BozMo talk 12:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Log
Done.--Isotope23 talk 16:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I was just thinking that... Don't know how to do it though...--Isotope23 talk 17:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

;-)
Just back from a Great Vacation. Feeling a wonderful afterglow of days of pure fun. Then joy, joy...more wonderful news...it will be a great benefit to Wikipedia for you to have the extra tools. Take care, FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 20:07, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Copyvio help on commons
Hello I noticed your RfA while looking at my RfA and saw that you are a commons admin so I was wondering if you could help me with something. About a week ago I posted on the commons noticeboard about User:PanchoHardy who it appears to me has uploaded a ton of wrestling images under false licensing while at the same time uploading real free use images via transwiki.

All of the fake images use the same summary which is they are listed as "self-made" however it is blatantly not the case as some of the images have been taken from inside cages, from magazines and various other sources. Although some could pass for truly self-made images such as I think the best course of action would be a mass delete.

My post on AN has had some replies but nothing seems to have happened in that time and I do not like the idea of this many copyvios on commons, could you help me out? –– Lid(Talk) 05:05, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Note to self: Check commons thread BEFORE appealing to a person you just saw was a commons admin. I see you replied twice to my commons post on November 6th. –– Lid(Talk) 05:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry for this but it's been another week now and still nothing seems to have happened. I really don't like that these have managed to stay up so long now, how many admins does commons have? –– Lid(Talk) 02:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Gracias. –– Lid(Talk) 13:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Whoops
I can but apologise - I had a quick look, but curse those pipelinks! :) Neil   ☎  13:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Your RFA was successful
Congratulations, I have closed your RfA as successful and you are now a sysop! If you have any questions about adminship, feel free to ask me. Please consider messaging me on IRC for access to the #wikipedia-en-admins channel. Good luck! --Deskana (talk) 14:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Congratulations :) I don't suppose I need to tell you to "let me know if you need any help"! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Congrats
Hi Herby! First (though for the second time) congratulations with your RfA. Good to have another fighter around. Regarding that, has anyone ever invited you to our IRC channels? There is a channel for admins, and some channels for spam fighting (and much much more). See for example: the spam watch channel and it's accompanying the talk channel (you need e.g. mIRC or the chatzilla plugin for firefox for that). In any way, see you around! --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Super news! Welcome to the team, Herby, delighted to see your RfA sailed through :) - A<font color= "#FF7C0A">l<font color= "#FFB550">is o n  ❤ 16:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I think most of the credit goes to the nominator, actually, and very little to the candidate... that nomination statement was nothing short of superb. -- J. Random Editor / (random comments?) 16:33, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * No way. Actually it's a miracle you made it despite that absolutely atrocious nom. -- TheTruthIsOutThere- tellme! 16:33, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Sad!... oh, wait. ;-)  --Iamunknown 16:46, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * And there was much rejoicing --Iamunknown 16:46, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * glad to see you here. By the way, you asked on another page about semi-protecting in general, (as compared to meta). I think we less often do this here unless there is actually a reason.18:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Hooray! Max S em(Han shot first!) 20:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Phew. That was a close one and deservedly so! Congratulations - I'll start bugging you to use that mop momentarily :) -- SiobhanHansa 14:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Well deserved, congratulations. - Modernist 12:42, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! Now get to work! :P GlassCobra 13:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Well done! Kudos for the "non-spam" thanks. <font size="+1">R udget zŋ 17:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations, and thanks for your hard work on various projects! Korg (talk) 23:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

RfA
I copied and pasted the format for an optional question, and accidentally pasted too much...then removed it. I'm pretty sure you've "restored" content accidentally pasted from another RfA. Note question numbers. Keepscases 15:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Howdy Herbythyme, thanks for participating in my request for adminship. I am happy to say it was successful, 55/0/0, and I am looking forward to getting to work. Thanks for your vote of confidence. By all means, feel free to check in on my work to come. Suggestions and advice are always appreciated.

--TeaDrinker 05:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

spamlink -> COIBot
I am not sure if you are familiar with COIBot's interaction with the spamlink template (I think so, seen your activity on meta). COIBot is monitoring a number of pages for the addition of spamlink, and picks up the links in the spamlink template to monitor. If you need additional proof on a link, then it is handy to put in the spamlink template on those pages. At the moment the pages monitored for the spamlink template are Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam, User:AntiSpamBot/Blacklist requests, Conflict of interest/Noticeboard, and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist (technically cross-wiki). It also picks up the regexes added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist (again, cross-wiki, so if it is blacklisted on the Portuguese wiki, and then spammed to en, COIBot will record and report). Hope this will improve the efforts to fight the spammers. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Adminship
Duh. You're a brilliant admin at Q. Will (talk) 13:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Blacklisted site
Did you blacklist beginner-sql-tutorial.com at meta? An IP posted to en.whitelist that the exploit has been corrected and I confirmed this. I'm going to go ahead and take it off en.blacklist, but I don't have access to meta. Thanks!--Isotope23 talk 13:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Meh
Advice please from someone I reckon is much more experienced than me! This makes me think that if 70.143.27.101 (you just warned them) is a school one then the IP is compromised - interesting collection of non en places it's been? Hope you don't mind - cheers -- Herby talk thyme 15:31, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Whether it is "compromised" (whatever that means) or not is of little interest to me. If unconstructive edits are repeatedly made from an IP address, it can be blocked. If constructive edits are being made, or there are no edits at all, then I fail to see that anything needs to be done. In either case, the nature of the IP address means nothing; the only thing that matters is whether or not it is shared by many users, as this usually entails shorter block times or anonymous-only blocks. In this case, the IP address has been blocked for a short time once before, and will presumably recieve a longer block if it continues to make unconstructive edits. I neither have the time nor see the need to expend effort running all kinds of checks every IP address whose edits I revert. I issue warnings because people complain if I don't; all I care about is keeping the articles free of unconstructive edits. Thanks – Gurch 15:38, 16 November 2007 (UTC)