User talk:Herdjeaf

October 2018
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ℯ xplicit 04:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

rename
I think "Splendors" is to close to your promo user name. You might want to choose again.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 20:39, 10 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Please don't remove declined unblock requests while you're still blocked. I have restored them for you. —  Wasell ( T ) 07:05, 11 October 2018 (UTC)


 * That choice of username is taken, you will need to choose another. You may simply edit the above request to remove your first choice and add your new one. Regarding your editing, you won't be permitted to edit about your organization.  Please understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a place to merely tell about an organization.  Wikipedia is only interested in what independent reliable sources with significant coverage state about an organization that show how it meets the notability guidelines at WP:ORG.  Wikipedia has no interest in what an organization wants to say about itself. If you are only here to tell the world about your organization, you will not be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 11:36, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Whilst any other admin should feel free to amend the conditions I offered or unblock at their discretion, I strongly feel that the user should agree to not edit about Splendors of dawn and should tell us what other subjects she can edit among our 5 million articles. I do not recommend unblocking otherwise. I will refrain from renaming for now.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 23:33, 11 October 2018 (UTC)


 * You have still not addressed the various points which have been made above, including the one concerning editing about your organisation, which by the time you posted your latest unblock request had been specified in four separate messages from three separate administrators. Also, your apparent belief that the only thing about the page you created that was promotional was your use of external links strongly confirms what I said above relating your lack of awareness of the nature of your own writing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:29, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

1) globally renamed Splendors of dawn to Herdjeaf 2)promospam

 * globally renamed Splendors of dawn to Herdjeaf.
 * Please read User:Dlohcierekim/g11 for more information about how and why the deleted page is promocruft. I must reiterate that you must affirm that you will eschew writing about Splendors of dawn and tell us what other edits you might make. Community portal is rife with links to some of the 5 million other articles that need attention. It is becoming clear that your only purpose is to write about Splendors of dawn. You must seek some other outlet if this is true.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 15:47, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Following a long series of appeals that completely miss the point I have revoked your talk page access. WP:UTRS is now your only way forward. Just Chilling (talk) 17:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Sigh, you all just went to hard on the guy that as you can see speaks English as a second language. Maybe, being more patient and giving WP:ROPE will be good here?--Biografer (talk) 17:33, 23 December 2018 (UTC)