User talk:Here4now2

Edit-warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. The Four Deuces (talk) 15:37, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia!  In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed is on article probation.


 * If Bill Ayers ghostwrote President Obama's book, that is huge news! I'm surprised I missed reading about it- the big news sources must have been all over it.  Maybe it broke while I was on my camping vacation.  If you can link to two or three of the newspapers that wrote about this (when this was confirmed to be true, there must have been hundreds of articles), I'll take this request for unblocking a lot more seriously. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:21, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sure the media will get to it after they acknowledge the Acorn scandal, the 2000 Miami Herald /NYT recount, etc.  As I am not the only one that tried to be accurate in the account of the book...the concerted effort to smother this is meant to protect Obama from anything negative.   This censorship is pathetic.
 * On a personal level, I encourage you to consider the possibility that the reason this hasn't been widely reported is that it not true. In fact, it is obviously not true.  It doesn't even make sense.  Bill Ayers has no reason to volunteer to write the autobiography of a law student with no money.  It's not just a false theory, it's a dumb theory.  At Wikipedia, however, 'truth' is not relevant; only what is verified can be published here. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:32, 8 October 2009 (UTC)