User talk:Heremeneutica1

Jan 2013
Please do not disrupt Wikipedia as you did on Lamb of God with the addition of unsourced and mis-formatted items after a revert. Else your access can be blocked. History2007 (talk) 19:03, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

If there is a given format to follow please direct me to that page. Otherwise the definition indeed is theological and original to my own pursuit. No sourcing was necessary. The term is Biblical in nature, hence its definition is theological, not cultural. Culture is not the source of that terminology. The disruption is your attempt to delete the development of the terminology, not mine to add to it. Your development was indeed lacking.

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Lamb of God, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 19:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

WP:3RR
This new user needs to read WP:OR and WP:RS regarding "the definition indeed is theological and original to my own pursuit". That is a no-no. Read WP:3RR a well. History2007 (talk) 20:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC)