User talk:HeroHero1

Sources not opinions
Hi, Wikipedia is based on what the reliable sources say not personal opinion. I know some people want to call Mosques temples (others want to change all articles to Masjid), however on Wikipedia we uses what the sources say. For both Fazl Mosque, London and Baitul Futuh Mosque there own websites use Mosque, and both "Fazl Temple" and   "Baitul Futuh Temple" have virtually no google hits to even show its a common alternative name. So please only make sourced changes. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 18:35, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note your changes are also not discriminating and you are breaking images and reference urls - continuing to make unsourced change from Mosque to Temple will be likely to be considered vandalism or disruptive editing. KylieTastic (talk) 18:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fazl Mosque, London. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 18:39, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fazl Mosque, London, you may be blocked from editing. KylieTastic (talk) 19:09, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Fazl Mosque
Calling these places mosques is inflammatory, inaccurate and propagandist without allowing for alternative reasonings to be listed on the same articles. Just because their own websites cite mosque doesn’t mean it is linguistically accurate. This would apply Ahmadis are muslims, a statement highly inaccurate and inflammatory to mainstream Muslims. Wikipedia prides itself as a source of knowledge and a bastion of accuracy, in that case counter arguments should be allowed for a defamatory cult trying to legitimate and propagate their own agendas using Wikipedia? You should allow scope for article accuracy otherwise Wikipedia is just a made up jumble of people own opinions no matter whose it is! HeroHero1 (talk) 19:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * "Wikipedia is just a made up jumble of people own opinions" - No it's not - see Identifying reliable sources if they and others (WP:COMMONNAME) call themselves a "Fazl Mosque" then that is the name. If you have an issue with them using the term Mosque then take it up with them. It does not need to be "linguistically accurate", it's a name of a place, it can be linguistically junk if they wanted.  Calling it "Fazl Temple" is just your opinion, with no source for your assertion, and Wikipedia is NOT people "just a made up jumble of people own opinions". KylieTastic (talk) 19:58, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Peoples opinions
Of course it is! well Kylie if you want to call yourself Kylie Micky Mouse, you are free to do so but but does that mean you can just hijack Disney and create your own derogatory wiki page and launch it on this platform, errrm I don’t think Disney will take this quite likely. The same rule applies here, the article should allow linguistic accuracy or it is just made up? I believe the term is *fake news* and is illegal under UK law to spread misinformation deliberately, which is what you are allowing here as this group is cult claiming and deceiving people with their bile. I should have the right to enter and cite alternative arguments for the contents accuracy. HeroHero1 (talk) 20:24, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * You have the right to add a section about this issue if and only if it is verifiable (WP:VERIFY) backed by citing (WP:CITE) reliable sources (WP:RS). What you can't do is decide to change the name with no source - see No original research and WP:NOTOPINION. Disney own the trademark so they could not (probably) call themselves "Fazl Micky Mouse Mosque", but as far as I'm aware there is no legal reason they can not use the current name. Finally even if they did call themselves "Fazl Micky Mouse Mosque" Wikipedia would be able to have that as a listing until legally challenged, but such an article would have a well sourced section on the legal issues of the name. KylieTastic (talk) 20:32, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh and also I should have mentioned such fundamental changes are normally discussed on the talk page of an article (i.e. Talk:Fazl Mosque, London) to get a Consensus - however it would still need reliable sources. Another option as I assume this is very much Islam related discus with the relevant WikiProject talk page Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 20:40, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your insights Micky ;oD HeroHero1 (talk) 21:57, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Anwar Uddin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 16:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

I can provide you a news paper article from 1992. That’s the only reference I have. HeroHero1 (talk) 13:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)