User talk:HeroicSSD

December 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to MeidasTouch, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Kline &#124; yes? 15:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

MeidasTouch
Do not ever remove the news article about the brothers using a slur again please thank you very much Persesus (talk) 21:57, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MeidasTouch. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kline &#124; yes? 02:46, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at MeidasTouch, you may be blocked from editing. Kline &#124; yes? 02:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at MeidasTouch. Kline &#124; yes? 03:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Chip3004 (talk) 06:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at MeidasTouch shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chip3004 (talk) 06:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 08:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)