User talk:Heron89

Welcome!

 * }

What is your relation to Jim Kwik?
Hello,

It appears your account was created in multiple language editions of Wikipedia in order to market Kwik

What is your relation to Kwik?

- Tournesol (talk) 09:56, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I work for him and I just want people to get the knowledge about him. Not from marketing point of view, just informative, that is why I tried to write it as general as possible. If you have any tips how I should rewrite that, please let me know. Best regards

Nomination of Jim kwik for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim kwik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jim kwik until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tournesol (talk) 10:00, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Jim Kwik for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Kwik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jim Kwik until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tournesol (talk) 10:01, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Jim kwik


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Jim kwik. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Jim Kwik. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jim Kwik – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:59, 15 April 2013 (UTC)