User talk:Heronhaus/sandbox

Peer Review
Hello Heronhaus, The article is written on the most debated topic, so it can be said that article has chosen the most adequate and most researched topic. But there are certain flaws in the article that needs to be removed so that the effectiveness of the article can be increased. These flaws are categorized into two main categories. •	Content flaws •	Formatting flaws Content Flaws By reading and reviewing the article it can be stated that the introduction and the explanation of the topic is too limited and it does not provide any comprehensive information, so that any new reader would not be able to get information regarding the web hosting. Secondly, the article does not provide any practical examples regarding the various dimensions of web hosting so that the application of web hosting can be understood more clearly and effectively. Formatting Flaws Besides, some deficiency in the content, there are also formatting flaws such as the article displays pictures in a way that these pictures create confusion for the readers to relate the concept with the picture. Besides these flaws the formatting, the font style and the organization of the text is not attractive for readers. Also, the information is written in a very congested manner, hence making it difficult for the readers, especially those readers who are reading the concept of web hosting for the first time to grasp the concept easily. Haifa Alburek2602:306:377E:F340:6868:1EDD:E811:DB46 (talk) 02:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC)