User talk:Hersfold/Archive 51 (March 2011)

The Signpost: 7 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 14:36, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

HersfoldOTRSBot
Would you be so kind as to kick off HersfoldOTRSBot to: Thanks in advance! Stifle (talk) 08:51, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Replace any OTRS pending tags dated February 2011 or earlier with
 * Notify users accordingly
 * Bug any OTRS volunteers who added in February 2011 or earlier to check up on the ticket?


 * Yep, I'll do so soon. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 16:12, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello from MOTD
Hello. We could do with your assistance for suggestions of mottos and any decisions on current ones. Please see Motto of the day/Nominations. In case this situation occurs again, we would like a discussion on emergency mottos. Please see WT:MOTD/N. Stifle (talk) 08:51, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; Stifle (talk) 08:51, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Existence does not prove notability
Existence does not prove notability, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Existence does not prove notability and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Existence does not prove notability during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  I Help, When I Can. [12] 03:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: New Article
Hello Hersfold, I understand the reasons for previously deleting the article on APRICO Solutions and have been revising the content. Can you advise the best way to get this reviewed prior to posting? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tulipfields (talk • contribs) March 31 2011


 * Hello Tulipfields, sorry for the long delay in getting back to you, I've been inactive for several months. From what I can see, you've since tried to recreate the article and it's been deleted again; after that, the page was created as a redirect to a section in the Philips article. If you still need assistance with this, please let me know, but given the reasons for the article's deletion both times, this may be the ideal solution. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 16:22, 25 May 2011 (UTC)