User talk:Hestera nmac3108/Draft:Edith Jacqueline Ingram Grant/JRDavisjr Peer Review

The draft is coming along nicely. I am surprised there isn't already a page for Ingram. The lead is easy to understand and gives an overview of the rest of the article. The lead includes the most important information. I am impressed with the content in the career section. The article would benefit from more content on how Ingram increased voter registration and ending poverty and drug use. I realize this may not be able to be expanded because there are not sources covering these areas. The article reads well, and it follows a clear structure and is in a sensible order. The coverage is balanced and the content is neutral and definitely does not seem sided. Everything included in the article is relevant and nothing reads off-topic. The Works Cited has good, reliable sources that cover the article well. It is a well written article that will benefit from more content and images if there are any available. JRDavisjr (talk) 04:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)