User talk:Heteait

Heteait, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Tom Abbott (speaker), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Iffy★Chat -- 11:46, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tom Abbott


A tag has been placed on Draft:Tom Abbott, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. bonadea contributions talk 07:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Note that advertising is not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia. The article was deleted as being purely promotional yesterday, so recreating the exact same text (including a whole bunch of spam links that were removed before the article was even deleted) is not constructive. Maybe four of the references in the article are not blatant spam - the other 40 are only there to extol Abbott, which is not part of Wikipedia's purpose. --bonadea contributions talk 07:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)