User talk:HeteroUltima

utcursch | talk 07:27, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Australia – New Zealand relations, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Australia – New Zealand relations was changed by HeteroUltima (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894084 on 2011-10-09T08:37:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:37, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Best of Century accolades
Category:Best of Century accolades, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 17:58, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Repeated moving of Death of Muammar Gaddafi to Murder of Muammar Gaddafi
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. gidonb (talk) 12:12, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * The first move was permitted and I gave a reason. It was rolled back for justification 'no reason'. So then I gave a source, which was a link to reliable published content; then I reinstated. You have no cause to smear that as "edit warring". HeteroUltima (talk) 00:04, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It's better to suggest the name change on the talk page, especially after the first attempt didn't fly, instead of repetitively moving the article to your preferred name within a short period of time without discussion. At Wikipedia we attempt to build an encyclopedia in consensus. gidonb (talk) 12:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Seconding Gidonb here. It's not acceptable to simply edit-war because you think you're right. You're not right, and you need to discuss on Talk. -Kudzu1 (talk) 00:56, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive Editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  F ASTILY  (TALK) 01:07, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Since you have demonstrated that you are not interested in helping the project by move warring over Death of Muammar Gaddafi, you are blocked until you decide you are ready to do so. Admins, please do not unblock without notifying me first. - F ASTILY  (TALK) 01:07, 24 October 2011 (UTC)