User talk:HexagonalProgression

January 2022
Hello, I'm Jingiby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 09:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 13:10, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi HexagonalProgression! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Pete George several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at Talk:Pete George, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.  NonsensicalSystem (error?)(.log) 13:56, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

False unbacked, not substantiated in the slightest accusations and slander against me by Jingiby - a deeply infiltritated Bulgarian ultra-nationalist and a lord of burlesque misinformation spreading, who ruins any credibility this Wiki may have.

Shame on you and anyone who supports your crusade against logical analysis and empirical evidence! HexagonalProgression (talk) 14:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

I have been unjustly blocked just for stating the fact that Pete George and his parents were Macedonian by ethnicity and not Bulgarian. In his own pursuit to spread misinformation, Jingiby doesn't even have internal consistency and posts incongruent and conflicting set of statements that would make one scratch their head wondering "how is this guy Bulgarian again?"

I get the ultra-nationalistic drive of Balkaners such as Jingiby, but the drive of truth and justice is stronger and will always prevail at the end. And if he thinks it hasn't, it is not the end.

At the end everyone interested will know the truth of Pete George and his parents' ethnicity. And that his page was hijacked by a Bulgarian ultra-nationalist. If I were to take this more seriously you could be brought to court by Pete's very own descendants. HexagonalProgression (talk) 14:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Partial-block; further disruption will result in a full and indefinite block
 You have been blocked from editing Pete George for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Pete George was a Macedonian
And so were his parents

Not Bulgarian. HexagonalProgression (talk) 15:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mark Madsen (fighter), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Cassiopeia  talk  23:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)


 * He literally says it in his octagon interview right after the fight. The score is also announced right before that, it is on UFC's official youtube channel. HexagonalProgression (talk) 21:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)


 * First of all, utube is not a reliable source, secondly pls read the warning message above again to understand the reason of the revert. Cassiopeia  talk  01:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

First of all youtube is a reliable source when you literally have the official channel which uploads with all rights the original content from their fights and interviews in which he first hand states what I wrote, and in which there is recorded the official announcement of the judges' decision. What is more reliable than that? I would say that is the MOST RELIABLE SOURCE for it is the place where the information is officially solidified first, anything else afterwards is second-hand source which takes from that original source.

Secondly, I read your message and understood it perfectly, you are the one in need to reread my message for you clearly do not understan it and comprehend it in the slightest, for if you did you wouldn't have responded as illogically as you did.

Third and final, I understand that you have formed a warped sense of identity strictly out of well... living on Wikipedia, where your delusions of being a "knowledge-spreader" are even more amplified just due to the level of unjustified and unmerited power you have accumulated here by exchanging time and superfluous governing, but the reality is that you are the radical opposite of a knowledge-spreader and all that your Wikipedia driven sense of identity containst and maintains, and the fact that you revert obvious facts taken from the most reliable sources and then in a supercilious manner suggest that my comprehension must have been faulty speaks to that.

You are the enemy of knowledge, you are all about ego and power, and then masquerading it under the guise of red tape advocacy which should not be necessary when people are spreading readily available main and original source certified knowledge.

You are not original either, many are like you on the internet and it is because of megalomaniac ignoramuses like you that Wikipedia has been rendered to a joke in any academic institution and slowly but surely even amongst the common folk. The only thing you may be original in is just how awful you are. I read the quotes on your page that you claim speak about you and if I say that I have never seen such a severe case of delusion I would be lying, it is all over the internet, nevertheless scarcely it has been so tremendously and pitifully reinforced by the very medium on which it operates and subsidizes itself. It would be fascinating if it just wasn't so tragic.

You have only made the internet more corrupt place and Wikipedia more of a joke, with your actual anti-knowledge campaign.

I would say shame on you, but people like you lack in the department of morality as well, plus your psyche already has mental blocks in place to process your repulsive morally and intellectually wrong response against me and probably against many others on here (who probably just took it in silence because they didn't care about some nobody taking its joke of a virtual identity too, seriously, which in turn most likely only increased your megalomanic tendencies. Well I am sure I am not or at least won't be the only one speaking up, but in case I am, I am glad that at least one person spoke up to you , you despicable enemy of facts and reason; one person might just be enough for bullies like you and if it is not, then I just hope and will work for a better world where phoneys like you don't get to sanction and silence knowledge-spreaders and treat them like vandals. While ofc the irony that you yourself are the biggest vandal of them all, certainly must be escaping you.)

HexagonalProgression (talk) 21:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:HexagonalProgression, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.  Cassiopeia  talk  00:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)