User talk:Hexicon AB

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Hexicon AB


A tag has been placed on User:Hexicon AB, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 11:48, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (We are merely highlighting that there is a need for 1.Renewable energies (with UN sources) and that 2. Wind is among the easiest and ways of building a renewable energy capacity (with sources) and 3. that offshore wind has best societal impacts (sources given) and that 4. Hexicon has a unique solution to speed this process up and we compare this with other excisitng solutions and concepts, sources given. We also refer explicitly to other solutions that we only see help in getting the above described process in place.

If we are making errors in how we use Wikipedia, please let me now what we should change. In comparison to other similar companies like the one on Renewable Energy Systems and others like Microsoft, I have tried to create a similar page.

Thank you for your help in case we need to change something.

Best regards,

The Hexicon Team) --Hexicon AB (talk) 12:00, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from User:Hexicon AB, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Cult of Green (talk) 12:06, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (Hi again: It is correct I -unintendedly- removed the tag. I was looking to remove a picture of our CEO, which I have now managed. Again; this is not blatant promotion. If you view our page and still think so, please me know what changes I should make to be accepted. If compare our site to that of Microsoft for example or Renewable Energy Systems, I am unable to understand why our page is promotional while it is very similar in approach to the others. Thank you for letting us know.) --Hexicon AB (talk) 12:13, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 13:25, 15 August 2014 (UTC)