User talk:Heyeppy

Radiant Logic, Inc.
I are currently making changes. I was under the impression I was just going through the making and history of the company. I am not trying to sell it, just trying to state its existence. Could you please refer to specific parts that are advertising so they can be changed. I am currently getting a second opinion to this so edits are on their way.

Your article
Talk with the admin that deleted the article and ask him if he will undelete the article so that you can work on it. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 23:15, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The admin is User:Nihiltres. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 23:16, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * And to make sure that your article doesn't look like an advertisement, read WP:Manual Of Style. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 23:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Radiant Logic, Inc.
Hi! From what I can tell, Radiant Logic might make a good fit for Wikipedia. :) But to do so you'll need to show that it is notable in a "Wikipedia" sense, which is to say that it has been the subject of coverage in reliable sources. The best bet is to find at least a couple of articles in newspapers or magazines discussing the company - I gather that InfoWorld had one, and I think IT World may have had another. One method which might help is to make your own version of the article, at something like Radiant Logic, get it working there (and I'm happy to help if I can), and then move it to Wikipedia proper once it is ready. - Bilby (talk) 00:20, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the tips. I have included a lot more references to the entry. Could you let me know what you think so far. It is under Heyeppy/Radiant Logic, Inc. You can just click here. 

--Heyeppy (talk) 17:13, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. It looks like you have enough there, but I'll stop by tomorrow and try and "wikify" it according to the Manual of Style, and I'll see if I can add any more refs. Once that's done it should be ok, given what you've already produced. :) - Bilby (talk) 13:24, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks alot for the help. If it wasn't obvious I am pretty new to this whole thing. I hope I can get the hang of it pretty quickly and help other people out too. --Heyeppy (talk) 21:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Your page
I pulled the nomination template off, but you might want to make sure that you make sure, again that notability of this can be established. if need be i would create your own subpage or sandbox so that you can edit away and wikify this so that no further issue is presented. All the best and CHEERS!--EmperorofPeopleEverywhere (talk) 23:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Radiant
It still sounds a little promotional, but I think leaving the advert template off is okay now. Thanks for checking.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  20:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Radiant Logic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Radiant Logic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Radiant Logic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. --  Primium  (talk) 22:52, 5 October 2023 (UTC)