User talk:Heygurl462

November 2012
Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Donovan Patton, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Lugia2453 (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

And I undid your edit to Munro Chambers. All Wikipedia content should be verifiable, and personal information on living persons must be reliably sourced. Thanks for understanding. Rivertorch (talk) 21:43, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Munro Chambers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Munro Chambers was changed by Heygurl462 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.986124 on 2012-11-17T00:03:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:03, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Munro Chambers with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 00:09, 17 November 2012 (UTC)